public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Guenter Roeck <linux@roeck-us.net>
To: Alexandre Courbot <gnurou@gmail.com>
Cc: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>,
	"linux-gpio@vger.kernel.org" <linux-gpio@vger.kernel.org>,
	Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] gpio: Do not accept gpio chip additions before gpiolib initialization
Date: Wed, 30 Mar 2016 02:16:02 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <56FB9952.1030503@roeck-us.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAAVeFuJZuOWAeG7q=WaZj0f6ch9zmOHvBZReYDnqbFQLsP7G5Q@mail.gmail.com>

On 03/30/2016 01:37 AM, Alexandre Courbot wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 30, 2016 at 3:20 AM, Guenter Roeck <linux@roeck-us.net> wrote:
>> Since commit ff2b13592299 ("gpio: make the gpiochip a real device"),
>> attempts to add a gpio chip prior to gpiolib initialization cause the
>> system to crash. Dump a warning to the console and return an error
>> if the situation is encountered.
>
> Mmm I see the problem but this could seriously delay the availability
> of some GPIOs that are useful for early system boot.
>
> I have not followed the GPIO device patches as closely as I should
> have, but shouldn't you be able to register a GPIO chip without
> immediately presenting it to user-space, for internal kernel needs? If
> gpiolib is not initialized, then device-related operations would be
> skipped, and gpiolib_dev_init() could then parse the list of
> registered chips and fix them up when it gets called.
>
> Again, I'm speaking without real knowledge here, but that pattern
> seems more resilent to me.
>
You are absolutely right, but my knowledge of gpiolib is not good enough
to make that change. See this as a band-gap; it is better than just crashing.

Guenter

  reply	other threads:[~2016-03-30  9:16 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2016-03-29 18:20 [PATCH] gpio: Do not accept gpio chip additions before gpiolib initialization Guenter Roeck
2016-03-30  8:37 ` Alexandre Courbot
2016-03-30  9:16   ` Guenter Roeck [this message]
2016-03-31  5:57     ` Alexandre Courbot
2016-03-31 12:48       ` Guenter Roeck
2016-03-31 15:59 ` Guenter Roeck

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=56FB9952.1030503@roeck-us.net \
    --to=linux@roeck-us.net \
    --cc=gnurou@gmail.com \
    --cc=linus.walleij@linaro.org \
    --cc=linux-gpio@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox