From: Mark yao <mark.yao@rock-chips.com>
To: Tomeu Vizoso <tomeu.vizoso@collabora.com>, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Cc: David Airlie <airlied@linux.ie>, Heiko Stuebner <heiko@sntech.de>,
dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org,
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
linux-rockchip@lists.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] drm/rockchip: Return -EBUSY if there's already a pending flip event
Date: Thu, 31 Mar 2016 09:25:43 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <56FC7C97.8000506@rock-chips.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1459345705-4473-1-git-send-email-tomeu.vizoso@collabora.com>
On 2016年03月30日 21:48, Tomeu Vizoso wrote:
> As per the docs, atomic_commit should return -EBUSY "if an asycnhronous
> updated is requested and there is an earlier updated pending".
>
> Also wait for the pending event to complete when a sync update is
> requested.
>
> Signed-off-by: Tomeu Vizoso <tomeu.vizoso@collabora.com>
> ---
> drivers/gpu/drm/rockchip/rockchip_drm_drv.h | 1 +
> drivers/gpu/drm/rockchip/rockchip_drm_fb.c | 14 +++++++++++++-
> drivers/gpu/drm/rockchip/rockchip_drm_vop.c | 6 ++++++
> 3 files changed, 20 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/rockchip/rockchip_drm_drv.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/rockchip/rockchip_drm_drv.h
> index 3529f692edb8..37952eefd33d 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/rockchip/rockchip_drm_drv.h
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/rockchip/rockchip_drm_drv.h
> @@ -69,6 +69,7 @@ int rockchip_register_crtc_funcs(struct drm_crtc *crtc,
> void rockchip_unregister_crtc_funcs(struct drm_crtc *crtc);
> int rockchip_drm_crtc_mode_config(struct drm_crtc *crtc, int connector_type,
> int out_mode);
> +bool rockchip_drm_crtc_has_pending_event(struct drm_crtc *crtc);
> int rockchip_drm_dma_attach_device(struct drm_device *drm_dev,
> struct device *dev);
> void rockchip_drm_dma_detach_device(struct drm_device *drm_dev,
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/rockchip/rockchip_drm_fb.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/rockchip/rockchip_drm_fb.c
> index 3b8f652698f8..028fd2f8f47b 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/rockchip/rockchip_drm_fb.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/rockchip/rockchip_drm_fb.c
> @@ -280,7 +280,19 @@ int rockchip_drm_atomic_commit(struct drm_device *dev,
> {
> struct rockchip_drm_private *private = dev->dev_private;
> struct rockchip_atomic_commit *commit = &private->commit;
> - int ret;
> + struct drm_crtc_state *crtc_state;
> + struct drm_crtc *crtc;
> + int i, ret;
> +
> + for_each_crtc_in_state(state, crtc, crtc_state, i) {
> + if (crtc->state->event ||
> + rockchip_drm_crtc_has_pending_event(crtc)) {
> + if (async)
> + return -EBUSY;
> + else
> + rockchip_crtc_wait_for_update(crtc);
> + }
> + }
>
> ret = drm_atomic_helper_prepare_planes(dev, state);
> if (ret)
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/rockchip/rockchip_drm_vop.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/rockchip/rockchip_drm_vop.c
> index e2118e62345b..5240bc8fe088 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/rockchip/rockchip_drm_vop.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/rockchip/rockchip_drm_vop.c
> @@ -848,6 +848,12 @@ int rockchip_drm_crtc_mode_config(struct drm_crtc *crtc,
> }
> EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(rockchip_drm_crtc_mode_config);
>
> +bool rockchip_drm_crtc_has_pending_event(struct drm_crtc *crtc)
> +{
> + return to_vop(crtc)->event;
> +}
> +EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(rockchip_drm_crtc_has_pending_event);
> +
No need to do EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL, rockchip_drm_vop.c and rockchip_drm_fb.c will build into same object.
> static int vop_crtc_enable_vblank(struct drm_crtc *crtc)
> {
> struct vop *vop = to_vop(crtc);
Hi Tomeu
Since rockchip atomic async use "serialize outstanding asynchronous
commits", async commit will wait on "flush_work(&commit->work);" to
ensure last pending event is done, so vop->event should be NULL after
flush. if not, it should be a BUG.
Anyway, serialize async commits is not a good way, but I don't think
your patch is better way.
I think maybe we can check the "commit->work" status(finish or running)
to judge return BUSY or not, instead of flush it.
Thanks.
--
Mark Yao
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2016-03-31 1:25 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2016-03-30 13:48 [PATCH] drm/rockchip: Return -EBUSY if there's already a pending flip event Tomeu Vizoso
2016-03-31 1:25 ` Mark yao [this message]
2016-03-31 8:00 ` Tomeu Vizoso
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=56FC7C97.8000506@rock-chips.com \
--to=mark.yao@rock-chips.com \
--cc=airlied@linux.ie \
--cc=dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=heiko@sntech.de \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-rockchip@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=tomeu.vizoso@collabora.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox