From: Can Guo <cang@codeaurora.org>
To: Bart Van Assche <bvanassche@acm.org>
Cc: jaegeuk@kernel.org, asutoshd@codeaurora.org,
nguyenb@codeaurora.org, hongwus@codeaurora.org,
linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org, kernel-team@android.com,
Alim Akhtar <alim.akhtar@samsung.com>,
Avri Altman <avri.altman@wdc.com>,
"James E.J. Bottomley" <jejb@linux.ibm.com>,
"Martin K. Petersen" <martin.petersen@oracle.com>,
Stanley Chu <stanley.chu@mediatek.com>,
Bean Huo <beanhuo@micron.com>,
open list <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 2/3] scsi: ufs: Fix a race condition btw task management request send and compl
Date: Fri, 29 Jan 2021 14:29:57 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <56b26318de92eb88d663bbdc7096edcf@codeaurora.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <5f77542d66732003f0154a4e8a6ae13b@codeaurora.org>
On 2021-01-29 14:06, Can Guo wrote:
> On 2021-01-29 11:20, Bart Van Assche wrote:
>> On 1/27/21 8:16 PM, Can Guo wrote:
>>> ufshcd_compl_tm() looks for all 0 bits in the
>>> REG_UTP_TASK_REQ_DOOR_BELL
>>> and call complete() for each req who has the req->end_io_data set.
>>> There
>>> can be a race condition btw tmc send/compl, because the
>>> req->end_io_data is
>>> set, in __ufshcd_issue_tm_cmd(), without host lock protection, so it
>>> is
>>> possible that when ufshcd_compl_tm() checks the req->end_io_data, it
>>> is set
>>> but the corresponding tag has not been set in
>>> REG_UTP_TASK_REQ_DOOR_BELL.
>>> Thus, ufshcd_tmc_handler() may wrongly complete TMRs which have not
>>> been
>>> sent out. Fix it by protecting req->end_io_data with host lock, and
>>> let
>>> ufshcd_compl_tm() only handle those tm cmds which have been completed
>>> instead of looking for 0 bits in the REG_UTP_TASK_REQ_DOOR_BELL.
>>
>> I don't know any other block driver that needs locking to protect
>> races
>> between submission and completion context. Can the block layer timeout
>> mechanism be used instead of the mechanism introduced by this patch,
>> e.g. by using blk_execute_rq_nowait() to submit requests? That would
>> allow to reuse the existing mechanism in the block layer core to
>> handle
>> races between request completion and timeout handling.
>
> This patch is not introducing any new mechanism, it is fixing the
> usage of completion (req->end_io_data = c) introduced by commit
> 69a6c269c097 ("scsi: ufs: Use blk_{get,put}_request() to allocate
> and free TMFs"). If you have better idea to get it fixed once for
> all, we are glad to take your change to get it fixed asap.
>
> Regards,
>
> Can Guo.
>
On second thought, actually the 1st fix alone is enough to eliminate the
race condition. Because blk_mq_tagset_busy_iter() only iterates over all
requests which are not in IDLE state, if blk_mq_start_request() is
called
within the protection of host spin lock, ufshcd_compl_tm() shall not run
into the scenario where req->end_io_data is set but
REG_UTP_TASK_REQ_DOOR_BELL
has not been set. What do you think?
Thanks,
Can Guo.
>>
>> Thanks,
>>
>> Bart.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-01-29 6:33 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <1611807365-35513-1-git-send-email-cang@codeaurora.org>
2021-01-28 4:16 ` [PATCH v3 1/3] scsi: ufs: Fix task management request completion timeout Can Guo
2021-01-29 3:22 ` Bart Van Assche
2021-01-29 5:46 ` Can Guo
2021-01-28 4:16 ` [PATCH v3 2/3] scsi: ufs: Fix a race condition btw task management request send and compl Can Guo
2021-01-29 3:20 ` Bart Van Assche
2021-01-29 6:06 ` Can Guo
2021-01-29 6:29 ` Can Guo [this message]
2021-02-01 2:27 ` Bart Van Assche
2021-01-28 4:16 ` [PATCH v3 3/3] scsi: ufs: Fix wrong Task Tag used in task management request UPIUs Can Guo
2021-01-29 3:15 ` Bart Van Assche
2021-01-29 5:57 ` Can Guo
2021-02-01 2:39 ` Bart Van Assche
2021-02-05 6:09 ` Can Guo
2021-02-07 2:50 ` Bart Van Assche
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=56b26318de92eb88d663bbdc7096edcf@codeaurora.org \
--to=cang@codeaurora.org \
--cc=alim.akhtar@samsung.com \
--cc=asutoshd@codeaurora.org \
--cc=avri.altman@wdc.com \
--cc=beanhuo@micron.com \
--cc=bvanassche@acm.org \
--cc=hongwus@codeaurora.org \
--cc=jaegeuk@kernel.org \
--cc=jejb@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=kernel-team@android.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=martin.petersen@oracle.com \
--cc=nguyenb@codeaurora.org \
--cc=stanley.chu@mediatek.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox