Re: [PATCH net 4/4] lib/test_bpf: Add additional BPF_ADD tests

Alexei Starovoitov
2016-04-05T16:29:13Z

On 4/5/16 3:02 AM, Naveen N. Rao wrote:
> Some of these tests proved useful with the powerpc eBPF JIT port due to
> sign-extended 16-bit immediate loads. Though some of these aspects get
> covered in other tests, it is better to have explicit tests so as to
> quickly tag the precise problem.
>
> Cc: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@fb.com>
> Cc: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
> Cc: "David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>
> Cc: Ananth N Mavinakayanahalli <ananth@in.ibm.com>
> Cc: Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au>
> Cc: Paul Mackerras <paulus@samba.org>
> Signed-off-by: Naveen N. Rao <naveen.n.rao@linux.vnet.ibm.com>

Makes sense. Looks like ppc jit will be using quite a bit of
available ppc instructions. Nice.

I'm assuming all these new tests passed with x64 jit?

Acked-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>