linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Florian Weimer <fweimer@redhat.com>
To: Mathieu Desnoyers <mathieu.desnoyers@efficios.com>,
	"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
	Russell King <linux@arm.linux.org.uk>,
	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-api <linux-api@vger.kernel.org>,
	Paul Turner <pjt@google.com>, Andrew Hunter <ahh@google.com>,
	Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
	Andy Lutomirski <luto@amacapital.net>,
	Andi Kleen <andi@firstfloor.org>,
	Dave Watson <davejwatson@fb.com>, Chris Lameter <cl@linux.com>,
	Ben Maurer <bmaurer@fb.com>, rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>,
	"Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>,
	Josh Triplett <josh@joshtriplett.org>,
	Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>,
	Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>,
	Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com>,
	Michael Kerrisk <mtk.manpages@gmail.com>,
	Boqun Feng <boqun.feng@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH v6 1/5] Thread-local ABI system call: cache CPU number of running thread
Date: Tue, 5 Apr 2016 18:02:25 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <5703E191.2040707@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <856357054.45028.1459802903401.JavaMail.zimbra@efficios.com>

On 04/04/2016 10:48 PM, Mathieu Desnoyers wrote:

> Moreover, the feature set that the application knows about, glibc
> knows about, and the kernel knows about are three different things.
> My intent here is to have glibc stay out of the way as much as possible,
> since this is really an interface between various applications/libraries
> and the kernel.

Surely glibc can allocate the space based on what is advertised as
needed by the kernel?  Why would it limit itself to what is supported by
the kernel headers it is compiled against if the actual size can be
queried from the kernel?

Florian

  reply	other threads:[~2016-04-05 16:02 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 29+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2016-04-04 17:01 [RFC PATCH v6 0/5] Thread-local ABI system call (CPU number cache) Mathieu Desnoyers
2016-04-04 17:01 ` [RFC PATCH v6 1/5] Thread-local ABI system call: cache CPU number of running thread Mathieu Desnoyers
2016-04-04 17:11   ` H. Peter Anvin
2016-04-04 19:46     ` Mathieu Desnoyers
2016-04-04 20:48       ` Mathieu Desnoyers
2016-04-05 16:02         ` Florian Weimer [this message]
2016-04-05 16:47           ` Peter Zijlstra
2016-04-07  9:01             ` Florian Weimer
2016-04-07 10:31               ` Peter Zijlstra
2016-04-07 10:39                 ` Florian Weimer
2016-04-07 11:19                   ` Peter Zijlstra
2016-04-07 12:03                     ` Florian Weimer
2016-04-07 12:25                       ` Peter Zijlstra
2016-04-07 12:37                         ` Florian Weimer
2016-04-07 15:59                         ` Mathieu Desnoyers
2016-04-07 12:34                       ` Mathieu Desnoyers
2016-04-07 16:39                     ` Linus Torvalds
2016-04-07 16:46                       ` Andy Lutomirski
2016-04-07 16:50                       ` Florian Weimer
2016-04-07 16:59                         ` Linus Torvalds
2016-04-07 16:52                       ` Linus Torvalds
2016-04-07 18:43                         ` Mathieu Desnoyers
2016-04-07 20:22                           ` Andi Kleen
2016-04-07 20:55                             ` Mathieu Desnoyers
2016-04-07 10:40   ` Florian Weimer
2016-04-04 17:01 ` [RFC PATCH v6 2/5] Thread-local ABI cpu_id: ARM resume notifier Mathieu Desnoyers
2016-04-04 17:01 ` [RFC PATCH v6 3/5] Thread-local ABI: wire up ARM system call Mathieu Desnoyers
2016-04-04 17:01 ` [RFC PATCH v6 4/5] Thread-local ABI cpu_id: x86 32/64 resume notifier Mathieu Desnoyers
2016-04-04 17:01 ` [RFC PATCH v6 5/5] Thread-local ABI: wire up x86 32/64 system call Mathieu Desnoyers

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=5703E191.2040707@redhat.com \
    --to=fweimer@redhat.com \
    --cc=ahh@google.com \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=andi@firstfloor.org \
    --cc=bmaurer@fb.com \
    --cc=boqun.feng@gmail.com \
    --cc=catalin.marinas@arm.com \
    --cc=cl@linux.com \
    --cc=davejwatson@fb.com \
    --cc=hpa@zytor.com \
    --cc=josh@joshtriplett.org \
    --cc=linux-api@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux@arm.linux.org.uk \
    --cc=luto@amacapital.net \
    --cc=mathieu.desnoyers@efficios.com \
    --cc=mingo@redhat.com \
    --cc=mtk.manpages@gmail.com \
    --cc=paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
    --cc=peterz@infradead.org \
    --cc=pjt@google.com \
    --cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
    --cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
    --cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=will.deacon@arm.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).