From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1755832AbcDGNXV (ORCPT ); Thu, 7 Apr 2016 09:23:21 -0400 Received: from arroyo.ext.ti.com ([192.94.94.40]:57296 "EHLO arroyo.ext.ti.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1750783AbcDGNXU (ORCPT ); Thu, 7 Apr 2016 09:23:20 -0400 Subject: Re: [RESEND v2] phy: hi6220: Add missing MFD_SYSCON dependency on HAS_IOMEM To: Krzysztof Kozlowski , Lee Jones References: <1459298943-20458-1-git-send-email-k.kozlowski@samsung.com> <20160330080837.GA3323@x1> <20160330081057.GD3323@x1> <56FB8D46.3030506@samsung.com> CC: From: Kishon Vijay Abraham I Message-ID: <57065F41.6070306@ti.com> Date: Thu, 7 Apr 2016 18:53:13 +0530 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:38.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/38.3.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <56FB8D46.3030506@samsung.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Wednesday 30 March 2016 01:54 PM, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote: > On 30.03.2016 17:10, Lee Jones wrote: >> On Wed, 30 Mar 2016, Lee Jones wrote: >> >>> On Wed, 30 Mar 2016, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote: >>> >>>> The MFD_SYSCON depends on HAS_IOMEM so when selecting it avoid unmet >>>> direct dependencies. >>>> >>>> This fixes warning on allyesconfig on ARCH=um: >>>> >>>> warning: (ST_IRQCHIP && HIP04_ETH && STMMAC_PLATFORM && DWMAC_IPQ806X && >>>> DWMAC_LPC18XX && DWMAC_ROCKCHIP && DWMAC_SOCFPGA && DWMAC_STI && TI_CPSW >>>> && PINCTRL_ROCKCHIP && PINCTRL_DOVE && POWER_RESET_KEYSTONE && >>>> S3C2410_WATCHDOG && VIDEO_OMAP3 && VIDEO_S5P_FIMC && USB_XHCI_MTK && >>>> RTC_DRV_AT91SAM9 && LPC18XX_DMAMUX && VIDEO_OMAP4 && HWSPINLOCK_QCOM && >>>> ATMEL_ST && QCOM_GSBI && PHY_HI6220_USB) >>>> selects MFD_SYSCON which has unmet direct dependencies (HAS_IOMEM) >>>> >>>> Signed-off-by: Krzysztof Kozlowski >>>> Acked-by: Lee Jones >>> >>> Holding off on this until the discussion reaches some kind of >>> consensus. >> >> FYI: https://lkml.org/lkml/2016/3/29/716 > > Yes, Rob's solution looks better to me. +1 - > > BR, > Krzysztof >