public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Hauke Mehrtens <hauke@hauke-m.de>
To: "Jon Mason" <jon.mason@broadcom.com>, "Rafał Miłecki" <zajec5@gmail.com>
Cc: Kishon Vijay Abraham I <kishon@ti.com>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Felix Fietkau <nbd@openwrt.org>,
	Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@gmail.com>,
	linux-usb@vger.kernel.org,
	">" <bcm-kernel-feedback-list@broadcom.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] phy: bcm-ns-usb2: new driver for USB 2.0 PHY on Northstar
Date: Thu, 7 Apr 2016 18:33:39 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <57068BE3.8090102@hauke-m.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAC3K-4pA+O3hcLMGN7jYLCLS03+5Q5GAH9o-Z1woYdZDt2hhcQ@mail.gmail.com>

On 04/05/2016 09:34 PM, Jon Mason wrote:
> 
> 
> On Wed, Mar 30, 2016 at 5:32 PM, Jon Mason <jon.mason@broadcom.com
> <mailto:jon.mason@broadcom.com>> wrote:
> 
>     On Tue, Mar 29, 2016 at 10:01 AM, Rafał Miłecki <zajec5@gmail.com
>     <mailto:zajec5@gmail.com>> wrote:
> 
>         Northstar is a family of SoCs used in home routers. They have
>         USB 2.0
>         and 3.0 controllers with PHYs that need to be properly initialized.
>         This driver provides PHY init support in a generic way and can
>         be bound
>         with an EHCI controller driver.
> 
> 
>     Like the USB3 patch you just submitted for NS, this is a common IP
>     block with NSP.  I believe with some minor changes it can support
>     both.  Please allow me 1-2 days to look at these in more detail and
>     see if I can get these patches working on NSP.
> 
>     Thanks,
>     Jon
> 
> 
> After some internal discussion, I don't think this is going to work. 
> This IP block is common for NS, NSP, and a few others.  So binding it to
> BMCA is going to prevent us from being able to use it on any other
> platforms.  However, a non-BMCA driver would still be usable by NS.  So,
> I think that is a superior solution.
> 
> We are currently in the process of getting a Phy driver out which would
> cover all the iProc SoCs.  I think it is 1-2 weeks away from being
> submitted.  So, I think to go forward we should use that one for NS. 
> However, that does not bridge the gap until it is accepted.
> 
> So, I think we have 2 options.
> 1.  Wait for BCM to submit the iProc phy driver
> 2.  Push this now, and remove it after the iProc phy driver is accepted.
> 
> Thoughts?
> 
> Thanks,
> Jon
> 
Hi Jon,

As far as I see this does not have any build time dependency to bcma, it
only uses some header from bcma. Does this not build and run on your
devices without bcma?

Hauke

       reply	other threads:[~2016-04-07 16:33 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
     [not found] <1459260114-10853-1-git-send-email-zajec5@gmail.com>
     [not found] ` <CAC3K-4rVr2Bs1_=0-8y9pHJnc6-qD=V0DjKRxqdhLTuDUWXgrg@mail.gmail.com>
     [not found]   ` <CAC3K-4pA+O3hcLMGN7jYLCLS03+5Q5GAH9o-Z1woYdZDt2hhcQ@mail.gmail.com>
2016-04-07 16:33     ` Hauke Mehrtens [this message]
2016-04-10 17:44     ` [PATCH] phy: bcm-ns-usb2: new driver for USB 2.0 PHY on Northstar Rafał Miłecki
     [not found] <1459512003-565-1-git-send-email-zajec5@gmail.com>
2016-04-01 12:04 ` Rafał Miłecki

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=57068BE3.8090102@hauke-m.de \
    --to=hauke@hauke-m.de \
    --cc=bcm-kernel-feedback-list@broadcom.com \
    --cc=f.fainelli@gmail.com \
    --cc=jon.mason@broadcom.com \
    --cc=kishon@ti.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-usb@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=nbd@openwrt.org \
    --cc=zajec5@gmail.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox