From: Roger Quadros <rogerq@ti.com>
To: Felipe Balbi <balbi@kernel.org>, John Youn <John.Youn@synopsys.com>
Cc: "nsekhar@ti.com" <nsekhar@ti.com>,
"linux-usb@vger.kernel.org" <linux-usb@vger.kernel.org>,
"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
"Shankar, Abhishek" <a.shankar@ti.com>,
"B, Ravi" <ravibabu@ti.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] usb: dwc3: core: Introduce dwc3_device_reinit()
Date: Mon, 11 Apr 2016 15:58:07 +0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <570B9F5F.3050207@ti.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <8737qsnw9x.fsf@intel.com>
On 11/04/16 15:51, Felipe Balbi wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> Roger Quadros <rogerq@ti.com> writes:
>
> <snip>
>
>>> I don't have this text anywhere so I don't know. Is this something TI
>>> came up with or Synopsys ? Unless I can see a document (preferrably from
>>> Synopsys) stating this, I can't really accept $subject.
>>
>> OK. I'll try to find out if there is an official document about this.
>>
>>>
>>> Another question is: if all it takes is an extra SoftReset, why don't we
>>> just reset it during probe() if max_speed < SUPER and we're running on
>>> rev < 2.20a ? BTW, which revision of the IP is on AM57x/DRA7x ?
>>
>> The issue might happen on any Run/Stop transition so not sure if doing it
>> SoftReset just at probe fixes anything.
>>
>> On DRA7x it is rev 2.02a.
>
> oh, same block as OMAP5 ES2.0 :-(
>
>>>>> question is, then: How are you sure that resetting the device actually
>>>>> solves the issue ? Did you really hit the metastability problem and
>>>>> noted that it works after a soft-reset ? How did you verify that
>>>>
>>>> I don't know if it solves the issue or not. It was suggested by
>>>> Synopsis to TI's silicon team.
>>>
>>> now that's a bummer ;-)
>>>
>>>> I never hit the metastability problem detection condition in my
>>>> overnight tests (i.e. LTDB_LINK_STATE != 4).
>>>
>>> overnight is not enough. You need to keep this running for weeks.
>>
>> how many weeks is acceptable for you? I can run for that long, no problem.
>> And what if the issue doesn't happen in that time frame, would you still
>> consider this case?
>
> Well, there's always the possibility we have never triggered the issue
> to start with :-) What happens if you remove the the current workaround,
> set maximum-speed to high-speed and constantly toggle run/stop bit
> (there's a soft-connect file under the UDC's directory in sysfs). Can
> you ever cause the problems ?
I had tried a with max-speed set to high-speed and a script that just reloads g_zero.
That should toggle Run/Stop right?
Running this overnight didn't cause any problems.
cheers,
-roger
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2016-04-11 12:58 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 24+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2016-03-16 13:05 [PATCH 0/2] usb: dwc3: gadget: Fix erratic interrupts and delayed enumeration Roger Quadros
2016-03-16 13:05 ` [PATCH 1/2] usb: dwc3: core: Introduce dwc3_device_reinit() Roger Quadros
2016-03-16 13:12 ` Felipe Balbi
2016-03-16 13:55 ` Felipe Balbi
2016-03-18 19:17 ` John Youn
2016-03-21 7:14 ` Felipe Balbi
2016-03-21 18:39 ` John Youn
2016-03-22 6:39 ` Felipe Balbi
2016-03-24 0:40 ` John Youn
2016-03-24 6:51 ` Felipe Balbi
2016-03-30 18:44 ` John Youn
2016-03-31 14:02 ` Roger Quadros
2016-03-31 14:26 ` Felipe Balbi
2016-04-04 7:50 ` Roger Quadros
2016-04-04 8:10 ` Felipe Balbi
2016-04-04 20:35 ` Shankar, Abhishek
2016-04-11 12:37 ` Roger Quadros
2016-04-11 12:51 ` Felipe Balbi
2016-04-11 12:58 ` Roger Quadros [this message]
2016-04-11 13:28 ` Felipe Balbi
2016-03-16 13:05 ` [PATCH 2/2] usb: dwc3: gadget: usb: dwc3: run/stop metastability workaround Roger Quadros
2016-03-16 13:14 ` Felipe Balbi
2016-03-16 13:27 ` Roger Quadros
2016-03-16 13:08 ` [PATCH 0/2] usb: dwc3: gadget: Fix erratic interrupts and delayed enumeration Felipe Balbi
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=570B9F5F.3050207@ti.com \
--to=rogerq@ti.com \
--cc=John.Youn@synopsys.com \
--cc=a.shankar@ti.com \
--cc=balbi@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-usb@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=nsekhar@ti.com \
--cc=ravibabu@ti.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).