linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Denys Vlasenko <dvlasenk@redhat.com>
To: Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@redhat.com>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>, Thomas Graf <tgraf@suug.ch>,
	Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
	David Rientjes <rientjes@google.com>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
Subject: Re: This patch triggers a bad gcc bug (was Re: [PATCH] force inlining of some byteswap operations)
Date: Wed, 13 Apr 2016 14:12:25 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <570E37A9.2050503@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20160413033649.7r3msnmo3trtq47z@treble>

On 04/13/2016 05:36 AM, Josh Poimboeuf wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 04, 2016 at 08:45:35PM +0100, Denys Vlasenko wrote:
>> Sometimes gcc mysteriously doesn't inline
>> very small functions we expect to be inlined. See
>>     https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66122
>>
>> With this .config:
>> http://busybox.net/~vda/kernel_config_OPTIMIZE_INLINING_and_Os,
>> the following functions get deinlined many times.
>> Examples of disassembly:
>>
>> <get_unaligned_be16> (12 copies, 51 calls):
>>        66 8b 07                mov    (%rdi),%ax
>>        55                      push   %rbp
>>        48 89 e5                mov    %rsp,%rbp
>>        86 e0                   xchg   %ah,%al
>>        5d                      pop    %rbp
>>        c3                      retq
...
>> This patch fixes this via s/inline/__always_inline/.
>> Code size decrease after the patch is ~4.5k:
>>
>>     text     data      bss       dec     hex filename
>> 92202377 20826112 36417536 149446025 8e85d89 vmlinux
>> 92197848 20826112 36417536 149441496 8e84bd8 vmlinux5_swap_after
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Denys Vlasenko <dvlasenk@redhat.com>
>> Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
>> Cc: Thomas Graf <tgraf@suug.ch>
>> Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
>> Cc: David Rientjes <rientjes@google.com>
>> Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
>> Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
>> ---
>>  include/uapi/linux/byteorder/big_endian.h    | 24 ++++++++++++------------
>>  include/uapi/linux/byteorder/little_endian.h | 24 ++++++++++++------------
>>  include/uapi/linux/swab.h                    | 10 +++++-----
>>  3 files changed, 29 insertions(+), 29 deletions(-)
> 
> Hi,
> 
> This patch seems to trigger a gcc bug which can produce corrupt code.  I
> discovered it when investigating an objtool warning reported by kbuild
> bot:
> 
>   http://www.spinics.net/lists/linux-scsi/msg95481.html
> 
> From the disassembly of drivers/scsi/qla2xxx/qla_attr.o:
> 
> 0000000000002f53 <qla2x00_get_host_fabric_name>:
>     2f53:       55                      push   %rbp
>     2f54:       48 89 e5                mov    %rsp,%rbp
> 
> 0000000000002f57 <qla2x00_get_fc_host_stats>:
>     2f57:       55                      push   %rbp
>     2f58:       b9 e8 00 00 00          mov    $0xe8,%ecx
>     2f5d:       48 89 e5                mov    %rsp,%rbp
> ...
> 
> Note that qla2x00_get_host_fabric_name() is inexplicably truncated after
> setting up the frame pointer.  It falls through to the next function, which is
> very wrong.

Wow, that's ... interesting.


> I can recreate it with either gcc 5.3.1 or gcc 6.0 on linus/master with
> the .config from the above link.
> 
> The call chain which appears to trigger the problem is:
> 
> qla2x00_get_host_fabric_name()
>   wwn_to_u64()
>     get_unaligned_be64()
>       be64_to_cpup()
>         __be64_to_cpup() <- changed to __always_inline by this patch
> 
> It occurs with the combination of the following two recent commits:
> 
> - bc27fb68aaad ("include/uapi/linux/byteorder, swab: force inlining of some byteswap operations")
> - ef3fb2422ffe ("scsi: fc: use get/put_unaligned64 for wwn access")
> 
> I can confirm that reverting either patch makes the problem go away.
> I'm planning on opening a gcc bug tomorrow.


Note that if CONFIG_OPTIMIZE_INLINING is not set, _all_ "inline"
keywords are in fact __always_inline, so the bug must be triggering
even without the patch.

  reply	other threads:[~2016-04-13 12:12 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 45+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2016-02-04 19:45 [PATCH] asm-generic: force inlining of some atomic_long operations Denys Vlasenko
2016-02-04 19:45 ` [PATCH] force inlining of some byteswap operations Denys Vlasenko
2016-02-05  7:28   ` Ingo Molnar
2016-04-13  3:36   ` This patch triggers a bad gcc bug (was Re: [PATCH] force inlining of some byteswap operations) Josh Poimboeuf
2016-04-13 12:12     ` Denys Vlasenko [this message]
2016-04-13 12:36       ` Josh Poimboeuf
2016-04-13 15:15         ` Josh Poimboeuf
2016-04-13 16:55           ` James Bottomley
2016-04-13 17:10             ` Josh Poimboeuf
2016-04-14 15:29               ` Denys Vlasenko
2016-04-14 15:57                 ` Josh Poimboeuf
2016-04-14 17:09                   ` Denys Vlasenko
2016-04-15  5:45                     ` Ingo Molnar
2016-04-15 13:47                       ` Josh Poimboeuf
2016-04-15 22:20                         ` Josh Poimboeuf
2016-04-16  9:03                           ` Ingo Molnar
2016-04-18 13:39                             ` Josh Poimboeuf
2016-04-18 14:07                               ` Arnd Bergmann
2016-04-18 14:12                                 ` Josh Poimboeuf
2016-04-18 14:21                                   ` Arnd Bergmann
2016-04-19  8:52                               ` Ingo Molnar
2016-04-19 13:56                                 ` [PATCH] scsi: fc: force inlining of wwn conversion functions Josh Poimboeuf
2016-04-22 23:17                                   ` Quinn Tran
2016-04-25 16:07                                   ` Josh Poimboeuf
2016-04-26  2:40                                     ` Martin K. Petersen
2016-04-26  3:37                                       ` James Bottomley
2016-04-26  7:22                                         ` Arnd Bergmann
2016-04-26  8:35                                           ` Christoph Hellwig
2016-04-26 10:05                                             ` Arnd Bergmann
2016-04-26 13:06                                           ` Martin K. Petersen
2016-04-26 15:58                                             ` Arnd Bergmann
2016-04-26 22:36                                               ` James Bottomley
2016-04-27  0:44                                                 ` Martin K. Petersen
2016-04-27 11:05                                               ` Martin Jambor
2016-04-27 21:34                                                 ` Arnd Bergmann
2016-04-28 14:58                                                   ` Chris Metcalf
2016-04-28 15:23                                                     ` Arnd Bergmann
2016-04-28 15:48                                                       ` Chris Metcalf
2016-04-27 22:00                                                 ` [PATCH, RFT] byteswap: try to avoid __builtin_constant_p gcc bug Arnd Bergmann
2016-04-27 22:11                                                   ` Josh Poimboeuf
2016-04-28 16:27                                                     ` Quinn Tran
2016-04-16  7:42                       ` This patch triggers a bad gcc bug (was Re: [PATCH] force inlining of some byteswap operations) Arnd Bergmann
2016-04-18 13:22                         ` Josh Poimboeuf
2016-02-04 19:45 ` [PATCH] force inlining of unaligned byteswap operations Denys Vlasenko
2016-02-05  7:28   ` Ingo Molnar

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=570E37A9.2050503@redhat.com \
    --to=dvlasenk@redhat.com \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=arnd@arndb.de \
    --cc=jpoimboe@redhat.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mingo@kernel.org \
    --cc=peterz@infradead.org \
    --cc=rientjes@google.com \
    --cc=tgraf@suug.ch \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).