From: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@linutronix.de>
To: Clark Williams <williams@redhat.com>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
RT <linux-rt-users@vger.kernel.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [RT PATCH] cputime: remove raw locks introduced by RT patchset
Date: Fri, 15 Apr 2016 09:13:34 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <5710949E.1020407@linutronix.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20160414220943.3d4d7dd2@sluggy.hsv.redhat.com>
On 04/15/2016 05:09 AM, Clark Williams wrote:
> Sebastian,
Hi Clark,
> This patch removes the raw spinlock operations when updating cputtime
> in the vtime_* functions in kernel/sched/cputime.c.
>
> Based on Frederic's commit b7ce2277f087fd052, there is no need for
> the raw spinlocks in vtime_* functions to guard against writer
> concurrency and the RT versions of write_seqcount_begin() and
> write_seqcount_end() make calls to preempt_disable_rt() and
> preempt_enable_rt(), so we'll be in atomic context while updating
> cputime.
>
> I've run this patch on x86_64 4.4.6-rt14 and the RHEL-RT kernel,
> with 12h rteval runs on systems with both no tuning and systems
> with isolcpus/rcu_nocbs/nohz_full cpus. No ill effects seen.
Frederic's patch made it into 4.5-rc1. What I did yesterday was:
* sched/cputime: Convert vtime_seqlock to seqcount
* sched/cputime: Clarify vtime symbols and document them
* Revert "vtime: Split lock and seqcount"
which is what you want, correct?
>
> Signed-off-by: Rik van Riel <riel@redhat.com>
> Signed-off-by: Clark Williams <williams@redhat.com>
Sebastian
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2016-04-15 7:13 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2016-04-15 3:09 [RT PATCH] cputime: remove raw locks introduced by RT patchset Clark Williams
2016-04-15 7:13 ` Sebastian Andrzej Siewior [this message]
2016-04-15 13:43 ` Clark Williams
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=5710949E.1020407@linutronix.de \
--to=bigeasy@linutronix.de \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-rt-users@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=williams@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox