From: Jaehoon Chung <jh80.chung@samsung.com>
To: Olliver Schinagl <oliver@schinagl.nl>,
Ulf Hansson <ulf.hansson@linaro.org>
Cc: Maxime Ripard <maxime.ripard@free-electrons.com>,
Chen-Yu Tsai <wens@csie.org>,
Venu Byravarasu <vbyravarasu@nvidia.com>,
Adrian Hunter <adrian.hunter@intel.com>,
Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.com>,
Lars-Peter Clausen <lars@metafoo.de>,
Sudeep Holla <Sudeep.Holla@arm.com>,
Sergei Shtylyov <sergei.shtylyov@cogentembedded.com>,
Wolfram Sang <wsa+renesas@sang-engineering.com>,
Wenkai Du <wenkai.du@intel.com>,
Chaotian Jing <chaotian.jing@mediatek.com>,
Kuninori Morimoto <kuninori.morimoto.gx@renesas.com>,
Hans de Goede <hdegoede@redhat.com>,
Michal Suchanek <hramrach@gmail.com>,
linux-mmc <linux-mmc@vger.kernel.org>,
"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
"linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org"
<linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] mmc: core: Improve marking broken HPI through devicetree
Date: Tue, 19 Apr 2016 18:49:15 +0900 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <5715FF1B.80402@samsung.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <5715FD6B.5000809@schinagl.nl>
Hi
On 04/19/2016 06:42 PM, Olliver Schinagl wrote:
> Hi Ulf,
>
> On 19-04-16 11:29, Ulf Hansson wrote:
>> On 19 April 2016 at 09:12, Olliver Schinagl <oliver@schinagl.nl> wrote:
>>> In patch 81f8a7be66 Hans de Goede added a patch to allow marking an mmc
>>> device as to having an broken HPI implementation. After talking some
>>> with Hans, we now think it is actually the mmc controller that can be
>>> broken and not support broken HPI's.
>> I don't want us to invent a DT binding for something you *think* is a
>> HW controller issue.
>>
>> Have you really excluded that this isn't a software issue? Me
>> personally haven't been using HPI that much so I can't really tell
>> about the code robustness from the mmc core (mmc protocol point of
>> view).
> Well this patch goes hand in hand so to speak with the broken-hpi patch introduced by him, he did most of the investigation. We just discussed how to handle it and asked me to cook up the patch.
I didn't understand why add this property. Is this same patch?
commit 81f8a7be6642b4c26ab681b2e0f4c4120a6de1b0
Author: Hans de Goede <hdegoede@redhat.com>
Date: Wed Apr 1 17:26:23 2015 +0200
mmc: Add support for marking hpi as broken through devicetree
The eMMC on a tablet I've will stop working / communicating as soon as
the kernel executes:
mmc_switch(card, EXT_CSD_CMD_SET_NORMAL,
EXT_CSD_HPI_MGMT, 1,
card->ext_csd.generic_cmd6_time);
There seems to be no way to reliable identify eMMC-s which have a broken
hpi implementation, but at least for eMMC's which are soldered onto a board
we can work around this by specifying that hpi is broken in devicetree.
>
> @hans, what do you think?
>>
>> Kind regards
>> Uffe
>>
>>> This patch adds a new capability, mmc-broken-hpi, which allows us to
>>> mark a broken hpi implementation on the host level.
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Olliver Schinagl <oliver@schinagl.nl>
>>> ---
>>> drivers/mmc/core/host.c | 2 ++
>>> drivers/mmc/core/mmc.c | 2 +-
>>> include/linux/mmc/host.h | 1 +
>>> 3 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>>>
>>> diff --git a/drivers/mmc/core/host.c b/drivers/mmc/core/host.c
>>> index 6e4c55a..9b63b36 100644
>>> --- a/drivers/mmc/core/host.c
>>> +++ b/drivers/mmc/core/host.c
>>> @@ -270,6 +270,8 @@ int mmc_of_parse(struct mmc_host *host)
>>> host->caps |= MMC_CAP_HW_RESET;
>>> if (of_property_read_bool(np, "cap-sdio-irq"))
>>> host->caps |= MMC_CAP_SDIO_IRQ;
>>> + if (of_property_read_bool(np, "mmc-broken-hpi"))
>>> + host->caps |= MMC_CAP_BROKEN_HPI;
>>> if (of_property_read_bool(np, "full-pwr-cycle"))
>>> host->caps2 |= MMC_CAP2_FULL_PWR_CYCLE;
>>> if (of_property_read_bool(np, "keep-power-in-suspend"))
>>> diff --git a/drivers/mmc/core/mmc.c b/drivers/mmc/core/mmc.c
>>> index 4dbe3df..9a19562 100644
>>> --- a/drivers/mmc/core/mmc.c
>>> +++ b/drivers/mmc/core/mmc.c
>>> @@ -1592,7 +1592,7 @@ static int mmc_init_card(struct mmc_host *host, u32 ocr,
>>> /*
>>> * Enable HPI feature (if supported)
>>> */
>>> - if (card->ext_csd.hpi) {
>>> + if (card->ext_csd.hpi && !(host->caps & MMC_CAP_BROKEN_HPI)) {
>>> err = mmc_switch(card, EXT_CSD_CMD_SET_NORMAL,
>>> EXT_CSD_HPI_MGMT, 1,
>>> card->ext_csd.generic_cmd6_time);
>>> diff --git a/include/linux/mmc/host.h b/include/linux/mmc/host.h
>>> index 8dd4d29..20f758e 100644
>>> --- a/include/linux/mmc/host.h
>>> +++ b/include/linux/mmc/host.h
>>> @@ -264,6 +264,7 @@ struct mmc_host {
>>> #define MMC_CAP_DRIVER_TYPE_A (1 << 23) /* Host supports Driver Type A */
>>> #define MMC_CAP_DRIVER_TYPE_C (1 << 24) /* Host supports Driver Type C */
>>> #define MMC_CAP_DRIVER_TYPE_D (1 << 25) /* Host supports Driver Type D */
>>> +#define MMC_CAP_BROKEN_HPI (1 << 29) /* Host support for HPI is broken */
>>> #define MMC_CAP_CMD23 (1 << 30) /* CMD23 supported. */
>>> #define MMC_CAP_HW_RESET (1 << 31) /* Hardware reset */
>>>
>>> --
>>> 2.8.0.rc3
>>>
>
>
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2016-04-19 9:49 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2016-04-19 7:12 [PATCHv1 0/2] mmc: Move broken-hpi also to the chipset level Olliver Schinagl
2016-04-19 7:12 ` [PATCH 1/2] mmc: core: Improve marking broken HPI through devicetree Olliver Schinagl
2016-04-19 9:29 ` Ulf Hansson
2016-04-19 9:42 ` Olliver Schinagl
2016-04-19 9:49 ` Jaehoon Chung [this message]
2016-04-19 12:20 ` Olliver Schinagl
2016-04-19 12:44 ` Jaehoon Chung
2016-04-19 9:51 ` Ulf Hansson
2016-04-19 11:22 ` Hans de Goede
2016-04-19 12:45 ` Olliver Schinagl
2016-04-19 19:20 ` Ulf Hansson
2016-04-19 10:52 ` Sergei Shtylyov
2016-04-19 12:21 ` Olliver Schinagl
2016-04-19 13:23 ` Sergei Shtylyov
2016-04-19 7:12 ` [PATCH 2/2] mmc: sunxi: Mark the HPI of the mmc controller broken by default Olliver Schinagl
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=5715FF1B.80402@samsung.com \
--to=jh80.chung@samsung.com \
--cc=Sudeep.Holla@arm.com \
--cc=adrian.hunter@intel.com \
--cc=chaotian.jing@mediatek.com \
--cc=hdegoede@redhat.com \
--cc=hramrach@gmail.com \
--cc=kuninori.morimoto.gx@renesas.com \
--cc=lars@metafoo.de \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mmc@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=maxime.ripard@free-electrons.com \
--cc=mhocko@suse.com \
--cc=oliver@schinagl.nl \
--cc=sergei.shtylyov@cogentembedded.com \
--cc=ulf.hansson@linaro.org \
--cc=vbyravarasu@nvidia.com \
--cc=wenkai.du@intel.com \
--cc=wens@csie.org \
--cc=wsa+renesas@sang-engineering.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox