From: David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>
To: Andi Kleen <ak@suse.de>
Cc: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>,
Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@kernel.crashing.org>,
David Woodhouse <dwmw2@infradead.org>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Dave Airlie <airlied@linux.ie>,
linux-arch@vger.kernel.org,
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Introduce compat_u64 and compat_s64 types
Date: Fri, 15 Jun 2007 13:09:17 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <5717.1181909357@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <200706151355.57464.ak@suse.de>
Andi Kleen <ak@suse.de> wrote:
> Why does it break them? It should just make them a little slower.
Not all CPUs deliver recoverable misalignment exceptions. This is probably
particularly true of NOMMU-mode archs where the CPU designed may have taken
the view that if a data exception is delivered, then the whole system is kaput
anyway and must be restarted.
> The network code requires unaligned accesses to work anyways so if your
> architecture doesn't support them it is already remotely crashable.
I thought we'd fixed all that.
David
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2007-06-15 12:10 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 35+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <200706150159.l5F1xNgM000459@hera.kernel.org>
2007-06-15 8:44 ` drm: fix radeon setparam on 32/64 bit systems David Woodhouse
2007-06-15 8:58 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2007-06-15 9:28 ` Arnd Bergmann
2007-06-15 9:31 ` [PATCH] Introduce compat_u64 and compat_s64 types Arnd Bergmann
2007-06-15 9:55 ` David Miller
2007-06-15 11:55 ` Andi Kleen
2007-06-15 12:00 ` David Woodhouse
2007-06-15 12:38 ` Andi Kleen
2007-06-15 12:03 ` Arnd Bergmann
2007-06-15 12:40 ` Andi Kleen
2007-06-15 12:47 ` David Woodhouse
2007-06-15 13:19 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2007-06-15 12:09 ` David Howells [this message]
2007-06-15 12:43 ` Andi Kleen
2007-06-15 12:54 ` Alan Cox
2007-06-15 12:54 ` Andi Kleen
2007-06-15 13:15 ` Alan Cox
2007-06-15 13:27 ` Andi Kleen
2007-06-15 13:32 ` David Woodhouse
2007-06-15 20:50 ` Robin Getz
2007-06-15 21:22 ` Andi Kleen
2007-06-16 8:31 ` David Woodhouse
2007-06-15 13:00 ` David Woodhouse
2007-06-15 12:11 ` Matthew Wilcox
2007-06-15 12:38 ` David Woodhouse
2007-06-15 12:42 ` Arnd Bergmann
2007-06-15 13:45 ` Matthew Wilcox
2007-06-15 13:52 ` Arnd Bergmann
2007-06-15 23:54 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2007-06-15 13:16 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2007-06-16 9:38 ` David Woodhouse
2007-06-16 10:26 ` Arnd Bergmann
2007-06-16 11:21 ` Arnd Bergmann
2007-06-16 11:34 ` David Woodhouse
2007-06-16 13:56 ` Matthew Wilcox
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=5717.1181909357@redhat.com \
--to=dhowells@redhat.com \
--cc=airlied@linux.ie \
--cc=ak@suse.de \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=arnd@arndb.de \
--cc=benh@kernel.crashing.org \
--cc=dwmw2@infradead.org \
--cc=linux-arch@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox