public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: David Daney <ddaney@caviumnetworks.com>
To: Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com>
Cc: David Daney <ddaney.cavm@gmail.com>,
	<linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>,
	Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>,
	Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>,
	Tony Luck <tony.luck@intel.com>,
	Fenghua Yu <fenghua.yu@intel.com>,
	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>, "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>,
	<x86@kernel.org>, "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@rjwysocki.net>,
	Len Brown <lenb@kernel.org>, Rob Herring <robh+dt@kernel.org>,
	Frank Rowand <frowand.list@gmail.com>,
	Grant Likely <grant.likely@linaro.org>,
	Robert Moore <robert.moore@intel.com>,
	Lv Zheng <lv.zheng@intel.com>, Hanjun Guo <hanjun.guo@linaro.org>,
	Marc Zyngier <Marc.Zyngier@arm.com>, <linux-ia64@vger.kernel.org>,
	<linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org>, <devel@acpica.org>,
	<linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	Robert Richter <rrichter@cavium.com>,
	David Daney <david.daney@cavium.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 00/14]  ACPI NUMA support for ARM64
Date: Mon, 25 Apr 2016 09:47:38 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <571E4A2A.8070908@caviumnetworks.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20160425111338.GJ16065@arm.com>

On 04/25/2016 04:13 AM, Will Deacon wrote:
> Hi David,
>
> On Tue, Apr 19, 2016 at 06:40:25PM -0700, David Daney wrote:
>> From: David Daney <david.daney@cavium.com>
>>
>> Based on v16 of device-tree NUMA patch set for arm64 [1],this patch
>> set introduce the ACPI based configuration to provide NUMA
>> information.
>>
>> ACPI 5.1 already introduced NUMA support for ARM64, which can get the
>> NUMA domain information from SRAT and SLIT table, so parse those two
>> tables to get mappings from cpu/mem to numa node configuration and
>> system locality.
>
> Whilst I've queued the main NUMA series for arm64, I'd really like to
> see more movement on the generic header file cleanups that you posted
> separately:
>
> http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1456358528-24213-1-git-send-email-ddaney.cavm@gmail.com

FWIW:  Those patches should still apply.  I am carrying them in my 
development trees, and have not changed them in any way.

>
> Given that this ACPI series already requires some significant cross-arch
> interaction (which is actually good!), perhaps extending the clean-up
> patches to encompass some of the ACPI bits might make sense, and we can
> get that queued as a pre-requisite.

The cleanup patches you mention above are really independent of the ACPI 
things.  I have applied them both before and after the ACPI patches, and 
both seem to work.  With a quick perusal of the ACPI patches nothing 
jumps out at me as being a candidate for inclusion in the header file 
cleanup series.

If you think it would be a good idea, I can repost the cleanup series.

David Daney


>
> Will
>
>> v5 updates:
>>
>>   - Fixed ia64 build failure by gating some unused functions with #if
>>     CONFIG_{X86,ARM64}.
>>
>>   - Fixed section mismatch errors for X86 case.
>>
>>   - Removed unneeded #include from some files.
>>
>>   - Tested to build cleanly on ARM64, X86_64, IA64
>>
>> v4 updates:
>>
>>   - Updated from Hanjun Guo's v3 patches.
>>
>>   - Rebased on top of v16 of device-tree NUMA patches.
>>
>>   - Reordered some of the changes so that we don't introduce code and
>>     then change it several times in the patch set.  New code is
>>     introduced in its final form.  Code reused from x86 is first moved
>>     with no change, and then a separate patch to make any needed
>>     changes.
>>
>>   - code that is used only by ia64, moved to architecture specific
>>     files.
>>
>> v3 updates:
>>   - Deep investigation about the ACPI_DEBUG_PRINT() and remvoe
>>     that for acpi/numa.c (patch 2/12)
>>
>>   - Remove the duplicate NULL check for table print (patch 3/12)
>>
>>   - Introduce CONFIG_ACPI_HAS_NUMA_ARCH_FIXUP to remove duplicate
>>     dummy function for acpi_numa_arch_fixup()
>>
>>   - Solve the problem that the mapping from logical cpu to numa node
>>     is wrong which spotted out by Lorenzo
>>
>>   - cleanups for x86 and move acpi_numa_slit_init() and some other
>>     functions to common place, then reduce the duplicate of x86
>>     and arm64 (patch 7-12/12).
>>
>>   - rebased on top of 4.4 and Ganapat's v9 patch set.
>>
>> [1]: https://lkml.org/lkml/2016/4/8/571
>>
>> David Daney (1):
>>    acpi, numa, srat: Improve SRAT error detection and add messages.
>>
>> Hanjun Guo (11):
>>    acpi, numa: Use pr_fmt() instead of printk
>>    acpi, numa: Replace ACPI_DEBUG_PRINT() with pr_debug()
>>    acpi, numa: remove duplicate NULL check
>>    acpi, numa: move acpi_numa_slit_init() to drivers/acpi/numa.c
>>    arm64, numa: rework numa_add_memblk()
>>    x86, acpi, numa: cleanup acpi_numa_processor_affinity_init()
>>    acpi, numa: move bad_srat() and srat_disabled() to
>>      drivers/acpi/numa.c
>>    acpi, numa: remove unneeded acpi_numa=1
>>    acpi, numa: Move acpi_numa_memory_affinity_init() to
>>      drivers/acpi/numa.c
>>    arm64, acpi, numa: NUMA support based on SRAT and SLIT
>>    acpi, numa: Enable ACPI based NUMA on ARM64
>>
>> Robert Richter (2):
>>    acpi, numa: Move acpi_numa_arch_fixup() to ia64 only
>>    arm64, acpi, numa: Default enable ACPI_NUMA with NUMA
>>
>>   arch/arm64/include/asm/acpi.h |   8 ++
>>   arch/arm64/include/asm/numa.h |   2 +
>>   arch/arm64/kernel/Makefile    |   1 +
>>   arch/arm64/kernel/acpi_numa.c | 149 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>>   arch/arm64/kernel/smp.c       |   2 +
>>   arch/arm64/mm/numa.c          |  17 ++--
>>   arch/ia64/include/asm/acpi.h  |   3 +
>>   arch/ia64/kernel/acpi.c       |   2 +-
>>   arch/ia64/kernel/setup.c      |   1 +
>>   arch/x86/include/asm/acpi.h   |   1 -
>>   arch/x86/mm/numa.c            |   2 +-
>>   arch/x86/mm/srat.c            | 116 +---------------------
>>   drivers/acpi/Kconfig          |   4 +-
>>   drivers/acpi/numa.c           | 224 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++----------
>>   drivers/of/of_numa.c          |   4 +-
>>   include/acpi/acpi_numa.h      |   4 +
>>   include/linux/acpi.h          |  18 +++-
>>   17 files changed, 375 insertions(+), 183 deletions(-)
>>   create mode 100644 arch/arm64/kernel/acpi_numa.c
>>
>> --
>> 1.7.11.7
>>

  reply	other threads:[~2016-04-25 16:47 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 32+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2016-04-20  1:40 [PATCH v5 00/14] ACPI NUMA support for ARM64 David Daney
2016-04-20  1:40 ` [PATCH v5 01/14] acpi, numa: Use pr_fmt() instead of printk David Daney
2016-04-20  1:40 ` [PATCH v5 02/14] acpi, numa: Replace ACPI_DEBUG_PRINT() with pr_debug() David Daney
2016-04-20  1:40 ` [PATCH v5 03/14] acpi, numa: remove duplicate NULL check David Daney
2016-04-20  1:40 ` [PATCH v5 04/14] acpi, numa: Move acpi_numa_arch_fixup() to ia64 only David Daney
2016-04-26  5:15   ` Hanjun Guo
2016-04-20  1:40 ` [PATCH v5 05/14] acpi, numa: move acpi_numa_slit_init() to drivers/acpi/numa.c David Daney
2016-04-20  1:40 ` [PATCH v5 06/14] arm64, numa: rework numa_add_memblk() David Daney
2016-04-20  1:40 ` [PATCH v5 07/14] x86, acpi, numa: cleanup acpi_numa_processor_affinity_init() David Daney
2016-04-20  1:40 ` [PATCH v5 08/14] acpi, numa: move bad_srat() and srat_disabled() to drivers/acpi/numa.c David Daney
2016-04-20  1:40 ` [PATCH v5 09/14] acpi, numa: remove unneeded acpi_numa=1 David Daney
2016-04-20  1:40 ` [PATCH v5 10/14] acpi, numa: Move acpi_numa_memory_affinity_init() to drivers/acpi/numa.c David Daney
2016-04-20  1:40 ` [PATCH v5 11/14] acpi, numa, srat: Improve SRAT error detection and add messages David Daney
2016-04-20  1:40 ` [PATCH v5 12/14] arm64, acpi, numa: NUMA support based on SRAT and SLIT David Daney
2016-04-20  7:41   ` Dennis Chen
2016-04-20  8:31     ` Ganapatrao Kulkarni
2016-04-20 16:29       ` David Daney
2016-04-21 10:06   ` Dennis Chen
2016-04-27  1:14     ` David Daney
2016-04-27  4:04       ` Hanjun Guo
2016-04-27 11:37         ` Dennis Chen
2016-04-27 15:40           ` David Daney
2016-04-20  1:40 ` [PATCH v5 13/14] acpi, numa: Enable ACPI based NUMA on ARM64 David Daney
2016-04-20  1:40 ` [PATCH v5 14/14] arm64, acpi, numa: Default enable ACPI_NUMA with NUMA David Daney
2016-04-25 11:13 ` [PATCH v5 00/14] ACPI NUMA support for ARM64 Will Deacon
2016-04-25 16:47   ` David Daney [this message]
2016-04-26  5:31     ` Hanjun Guo
2016-04-26 12:15       ` Will Deacon
2016-04-26 13:03         ` Hanjun Guo
2016-04-26 13:35           ` Will Deacon
2016-04-26 16:48             ` David Daney
2016-04-27  1:49             ` Hanjun Guo

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=571E4A2A.8070908@caviumnetworks.com \
    --to=ddaney@caviumnetworks.com \
    --cc=Marc.Zyngier@arm.com \
    --cc=catalin.marinas@arm.com \
    --cc=david.daney@cavium.com \
    --cc=ddaney.cavm@gmail.com \
    --cc=devel@acpica.org \
    --cc=fenghua.yu@intel.com \
    --cc=frowand.list@gmail.com \
    --cc=grant.likely@linaro.org \
    --cc=hanjun.guo@linaro.org \
    --cc=hpa@zytor.com \
    --cc=lenb@kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-ia64@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=lv.zheng@intel.com \
    --cc=mark.rutland@arm.com \
    --cc=mingo@redhat.com \
    --cc=rjw@rjwysocki.net \
    --cc=robert.moore@intel.com \
    --cc=robh+dt@kernel.org \
    --cc=rrichter@cavium.com \
    --cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
    --cc=tony.luck@intel.com \
    --cc=will.deacon@arm.com \
    --cc=x86@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox