From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org>
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand
	id S1751950AbcDZCMM (ORCPT <rfc822;w@1wt.eu>);
	Mon, 25 Apr 2016 22:12:12 -0400
Received: from mga02.intel.com ([134.134.136.20]:5604 "EHLO mga02.intel.com"
	rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP
	id S1750817AbcDZCMK (ORCPT <rfc822;linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>);
	Mon, 25 Apr 2016 22:12:10 -0400
X-ExtLoop1: 1
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.24,535,1455004800"; 
   d="scan'208";a="91859928"
Subject: Re: [PATCH v6 03/10] regulator: fixed: add device binding for
 platform device
To: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
References: <1461571496-9600-1-git-send-email-baolu.lu@linux.intel.com>
 <1461571496-9600-4-git-send-email-baolu.lu@linux.intel.com>
 <20160425164019.GM3217@sirena.org.uk>
Cc: felipe.balbi@linux.intel.com, Mathias Nyman <mathias.nyman@intel.com>,
        Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>,
        Lee Jones <lee.jones@linaro.org>,
        Heikki Krogerus <heikki.krogerus@linux.intel.com>,
        MyungJoo Ham <myungjoo.ham@samsung.com>,
        Chanwoo Choi <cw00.choi@samsung.com>,
        Liam Girdwood <lgirdwood@gmail.com>, linux-usb@vger.kernel.org,
        linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
From: Lu Baolu <baolu.lu@linux.intel.com>
Message-ID: <571ECE76.3020600@linux.intel.com>
Date: Tue, 26 Apr 2016 10:12:06 +0800
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:38.0) Gecko/20100101
 Thunderbird/38.5.1
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <20160425164019.GM3217@sirena.org.uk>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
List-ID: <linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org>
X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org

Hi Mark,

On 04/26/2016 12:40 AM, Mark Brown wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 25, 2016 at 04:04:49PM +0800, Lu Baolu wrote:
>
>> This is needed to handle the GPIO connected USB vcc pin found on
>> Intel Baytrail devices.
> In what way is this needed?  The we defualt to using the driver name if
> no platform ID table, AFAICT this is just restating the same string?

You are right. This is not a "needed". It just makes the platform
driver binding explicit. We can ignore it if you don't like it.

Best regards,
Lu Baolu