From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1752650AbcD1One (ORCPT ); Thu, 28 Apr 2016 10:43:34 -0400 Received: from www381.your-server.de ([78.46.137.84]:34145 "EHLO www381.your-server.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1750785AbcD1Onc (ORCPT ); Thu, 28 Apr 2016 10:43:32 -0400 Subject: Re: [PATCH] iio: tmp006: Set correct iio name To: One Thousand Gnomes References: <1461296584-11918-1-git-send-email-sdliyong@gmail.com> <43150fbd-37ac-2d51-dd87-f41670417b96@kernel.org> <571E854A.90404@gmail.com> <7621197a-95ed-239e-8baa-83014bc27a26@kernel.org> <571F49B0.4060407@metafoo.de> <571F588D.3010800@metafoo.de> <5720EFAA.3040407@intel.com> <5721C904.3010505@metafoo.de> <20160428142458.09e498e2@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk> Cc: Crestez Dan Leonard , Daniel Baluta , Yong Li , Jonathan Cameron , Hartmut Knaack , Peter Meerwald-Stadler , =?UTF-8?Q?Krzysztof_Koz=c5=82owski?= , Matt Ranostaj , "linux-iio@vger.kernel.org" , Linux Kernel Mailing List From: Lars-Peter Clausen Message-ID: <57221B76.5080108@metafoo.de> Date: Thu, 28 Apr 2016 16:17:26 +0200 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:38.0) Gecko/20100101 Icedove/38.7.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <20160428142458.09e498e2@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Authenticated-Sender: lars@metafoo.de Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On 04/28/2016 03:24 PM, One Thousand Gnomes wrote: >> It's clearly wrong. But the problem is there might be an application that >> depends on the wrong behavior, the driver has been around for 2.5 years. So >> it's difficult to fix. We might just go ahead in this case and take the >> chance that nobody will complain. But if somebody complains this will bring >> us the wrath of the Linus. > > Not if you put it into next, test it, then into a new release as early as > possible (for -rc1), clearly document that it's got a user visible change > that should not matter with instructions if anyone hits this as a > bisection for their app failing to email so you know and can revert it. I don't expend application developers to run -rc kernels just to check whether their application still works. You'd get such a report 6 month after the kernel has been released once the change has trickled down.