From: Vladimir Zapolskiy <vz@mleia.com>
To: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
Cc: Roland Stigge <stigge@antcom.de>,
Russell King <linux@arm.linux.org.uk>,
Kevin Hilman <khilman@kernel.org>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Sylvain Lemieux <slemieux.tyco@gmail.com>,
Olof Johansson <olof@lixom.net>,
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/3] MAINTAINERS: add new maintainers of NXP LPC32xx SoC
Date: Fri, 29 Apr 2016 02:10:32 +0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <57229868.30403@mleia.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4622738.ujCxg0gb7N@wuerfel>
Hi Arnd,
On 27.04.2016 12:39, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> On Wednesday 27 April 2016 02:55:16 Vladimir Zapolskiy wrote:
>> Roland Stigge added initial support of NXP LPC32xx SoC series and
>> first boards powered by it, but for a while since v3.18-rc1 the
>> SoC support is unmaintained and became stale.
>>
>> Vladimir Zapolskiy and Sylvain Lemieux expressed interest in
>> continuation of NXP LPC32xx maintenance, reflect this in MAINTAINERS
>> record file for better communication with Linux kernel community.
>>
>> The maintenance change is in agreement with Arnd Bergmann:
>>
>
> Looks good. Let's give Roland some time to reply (hopefully with
> and Ack), and then merge it for 4.7.
>
to simplify the matter and to legitimate the process somehow I decided
not to include this change of maintainers into my last LPC32xx SoC pull
request, hence the pull request contains only code changes.
In other words please let me explicitly delegate a decision to you or
other ARM maintainers when and which way to apply this change. As for
me here I would prefer to get Signed-off-by tags from one of you.
If I'm worried for nothing, or if you don't consider to pick these
changes up directly from linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, for
your convenience I'll send a pull request to arm@kernel.org.
For what it's worth this is a link to the last discussion with Roland
on LAKML (the discussed problems are handled at the moment):
http://lists.infradead.org/pipermail/linux-arm-kernel/2015-April/337078.html
--
With best wishes,
Vladimir
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2016-04-28 23:12 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2016-04-26 23:55 [PATCH 0/3] MAINTAINERS: add new maintainers of NXP LPC32xx SoC Vladimir Zapolskiy
2016-04-26 23:55 ` [PATCH 1/3] MAINTAINERS: move ARM/NXP LPC32xx record to ARM section Vladimir Zapolskiy
2016-04-26 23:55 ` [PATCH 2/3] MAINTAINERS: add new maintainers of NXP LPC32xx SoC Vladimir Zapolskiy
2016-04-26 23:55 ` [PATCH 3/3] MAINTAINERS: add ARM/NXP LPC32XX SoC specific drivers to the section Vladimir Zapolskiy
2016-04-27 9:39 ` [PATCH 0/3] MAINTAINERS: add new maintainers of NXP LPC32xx SoC Arnd Bergmann
2016-04-28 23:10 ` Vladimir Zapolskiy [this message]
2016-04-28 23:14 ` Arnd Bergmann
2016-04-29 0:02 ` Vladimir Zapolskiy
2016-05-09 13:37 ` Arnd Bergmann
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=57229868.30403@mleia.com \
--to=vz@mleia.com \
--cc=arnd@arndb.de \
--cc=khilman@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux@arm.linux.org.uk \
--cc=olof@lixom.net \
--cc=slemieux.tyco@gmail.com \
--cc=stigge@antcom.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox