From: Shuah Khan <shuahkh@osg.samsung.com>
To: Lars-Peter Clausen <lars@metafoo.de>,
mchehab@osg.samsung.com, laurent.pinchart@ideasonboard.com,
hans.verkuil@cisco.com, chehabrafael@gmail.com,
sakari.ailus@iki.fi
Cc: linux-media@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Shuah Khan <shuahkh@osg.samsung.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] media: fix media_ioctl use-after-free when driver unbinds
Date: Fri, 29 Apr 2016 10:52:31 -0600 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <5723914F.6020504@osg.samsung.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <5721B994.4030202@metafoo.de>
On 04/28/2016 01:19 AM, Lars-Peter Clausen wrote:
> On 04/27/2016 11:56 PM, Shuah Khan wrote:
>>>> dev_dbg(mdev->dev, "Media device unregistered\n");
>>>> }
>>>> diff --git a/drivers/media/media-devnode.c b/drivers/media/media-devnode.c
>>>> index 29409f4..9af9ba1 100644
>>>> --- a/drivers/media/media-devnode.c
>>>> +++ b/drivers/media/media-devnode.c
>>>> @@ -171,6 +171,9 @@ static int media_open(struct inode *inode, struct file *filp)
>>>> mutex_unlock(&media_devnode_lock);
>>>> return -ENXIO;
>>>> }
>>>> +
>>>> + kobject_get(&mdev->kobj);
>>>
>>> This is not necessary, and if it was it would be prone to race condition as
>>> the last reference could be dropped before this line. But assigning the cdev
>>> parent makes sure that we always have a reference to the object while the
>>> open() callback is running.
>>
>> I don't see cdev parent kobj get in cdev_get() which does kobject_get()
>> on cdev->kobj. Is that enough to get the reference?
>>
>> cdev_add() gets the cdev parent kobj and cdev_del() puts it back. That is
>> the reason why I added a get here and put in media_release().
>>
>
> The cdev takes the parent reference when created and only drops it once it
> is released. So as long as the cdev exists there is a reference to the
> parent. While cdev_del() puts one reference to the cdev there is also one
> reference for each open file. So as long as there is a open file there is a
> reference to the parent as well.
>
>> I can remove the get and put and test. Looks like I am not checking
>> kobject_get() return value which isn't good?
>
> kobject_get() can't fail.
Yes looks that way, yet there are so many places in lib/kobject.c
that check for kobject_get() returning NULL. :)
>
>>
>>>
>>>> +
>>>> /* and increase the device refcount */
>>>> get_device(&mdev->dev);
>>>> mutex_unlock(&media_devnode_lock);
>>>> /*
>>> [...]
>>>> diff --git a/include/media/media-devnode.h b/include/media/media-devnode.h
>>>> index fe42f08..ba4bdaa 100644
>>>> --- a/include/media/media-devnode.h
>>>> +++ b/include/media/media-devnode.h
>>>> @@ -70,7 +70,9 @@ struct media_file_operations {
>>>> * @fops: pointer to struct &media_file_operations with media device ops
>>>> * @dev: struct device pointer for the media controller device
>>>> * @cdev: struct cdev pointer character device
>>>> + * @kobj: struct kobject
>>>> * @parent: parent device
>>>> + * @media_dev: media device
>>>> * @minor: device node minor number
>>>> * @flags: flags, combination of the MEDIA_FLAG_* constants
>>>> * @release: release callback called at the end of media_devnode_release()
>>>> @@ -87,7 +89,9 @@ struct media_devnode {
>>>> /* sysfs */
>>>> struct device dev; /* media device */
>>>> struct cdev cdev; /* character device */
>>>> + struct kobject kobj; /* set as cdev parent kobj */
>>>
>>> You don't need a extra kobj. Just use the struct dev kobj.
>>
>> Yeah I can use that as long as I can override the default release
>> function with media_devnode_free(). media_devnode should stick around
>> until the last app closes /dev/mediaX even if the media_device is no
>> longer registered. i.e media_ioctl should be able to check if devnode
>> is registered or not. I think I am missing something and don't understand
>> how struct dev kobj can be used.
>
> The struct dev that is embedded into th media_devnode as the same live time
> as the media_devnode itself. In addition to that struct device is a
> reference counted object. This means a structure that embeds struct device
> must not be freed until the last reference is dropped.
>
> What you do here is introduce a independent reference counting mechanism for
> the same structure. Which means if there is a reference to struct device,
> but not to the new kobj you end up with a use-after-free again.
>
> The solution is to only use one reference counting mechanism (the struct
> device) and intialize the cdev kobj parent to the device kobj and whenever
> you did kobj_{get,put}() replace that with {get,put}_device(). And in the
> device release callback free the struct media_devnode.
>
Okay. It is all well and good that I can use the kobj in devnode->dev,
however, devnode->dev doesn't get initialized in device_register(&devnode->dev)
and cdev_add() is the one that does kobject_get() on the cdev parent kobj.
I am seeing:
[ 45.724866] au0828: Registered device AU0828 [Hauppauge HVR950Q]
[ 45.724961] ------------[ cut here ]------------
[ 45.724975] WARNING: CPU: 1 PID: 312 at lib/kobject.c:597 kobject_get+0x8f/0xf0
[ 45.724982] kobject: '(null)' (ffff8801f6166530): is not initialized, yet kobject_get() is being called.
warnings as soon as drivers do cdev_add().
This will be a problem at cdev_del() time, since cdev_del() is done after
device_unregister(&devnode->dev) and device_del() deletes the dev->kobj
In other words, devnode->dev lifetime is going to be within
device_register(&devnode->dev) and device_unregister(&devnode->dev)
and that won't work as cdev_add() happens before device_register(&devnode->dev)
and cdev_del() after device_unregister(&devnode->dev)
cdev_add()
device_register(&devnode->dev)
dev.kobj initialized
device_unregister(&devnode->dev)
dev.kobj deleted
cdev_del()
I will go back to adding kobject to devnode.
thanks,
-- Shuah
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2016-04-29 16:52 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2016-04-27 3:08 [PATCH] media: fix media_ioctl use-after-free when driver unbinds Shuah Khan
2016-04-27 9:55 ` Mauro Carvalho Chehab
2016-04-27 13:51 ` Shuah Khan
2016-04-28 11:52 ` Mauro Carvalho Chehab
2016-04-27 16:43 ` Lars-Peter Clausen
2016-04-27 21:56 ` Shuah Khan
2016-04-28 7:19 ` Lars-Peter Clausen
2016-04-29 16:52 ` Shuah Khan [this message]
2016-04-28 11:47 ` Mauro Carvalho Chehab
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=5723914F.6020504@osg.samsung.com \
--to=shuahkh@osg.samsung.com \
--cc=chehabrafael@gmail.com \
--cc=hans.verkuil@cisco.com \
--cc=lars@metafoo.de \
--cc=laurent.pinchart@ideasonboard.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-media@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mchehab@osg.samsung.com \
--cc=sakari.ailus@iki.fi \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox