From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1754755AbcEBRdT (ORCPT ); Mon, 2 May 2016 13:33:19 -0400 Received: from mga01.intel.com ([192.55.52.88]:54122 "EHLO mga01.intel.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1754721AbcEBRdM (ORCPT ); Mon, 2 May 2016 13:33:12 -0400 X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.24,568,1455004800"; d="scan'208";a="967103967" Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 04/10] x86/xsaves: Introduce a new check that allows correct xstates copy from kernel to user directly To: Yu-cheng Yu References: <5723BF63.2000100@linux.intel.com> <20160429224338.GA15757@test-lenovo> <5723FE20.7000906@linux.intel.com> <20160502155734.GA21577@test-lenovo> <57277B11.9080802@linux.intel.com> <20160502163410.GA21734@test-lenovo> <572783C3.8040907@linux.intel.com> <20160502171936.GA22224@test-lenovo> Cc: x86@kernel.org, "H. Peter Anvin" , Thomas Gleixner , Ingo Molnar , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Andy Lutomirski , Borislav Petkov , Sai Praneeth Prakhya , "Ravi V. Shankar" , Fenghua Yu From: Dave Hansen Message-ID: <57278F56.6050600@linux.intel.com> Date: Mon, 2 May 2016 10:33:10 -0700 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:38.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/38.6.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <20160502171936.GA22224@test-lenovo> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On 05/02/2016 10:19 AM, Yu-cheng Yu wrote: > On Mon, May 02, 2016 at 09:43:47AM -0700, Dave Hansen wrote: >>> If (fpu.fpstate_active == 0), then the task does not use FPU; we don't >>> want to save these registers, right? >> >> No. It's possible to have fpstate_active=0 while fpregs_active=1. Such >> a task uses the FPU, but just hasn't done an XSAVE* to save the register >> content to the fpstate buffer. >> >> Note, this is just theoretical, and does not happen in this particular >> call path today. > > What about... > > static int may_copy_fpregs_to_sigframe(void) > { > if (fpregs_active()) > return 1; > > WARN_ONCE(!current->thread.fpu.fpstate_active, > "direct FPU save with no math use\n"); > > if (boot_cpu_has(X86_FEATURE_XSAVES)) > return 1; > > return 0; > } I don't think that changes anything. We still have a check in there that has no purpose. You've changed the ordering so that the specific example that I pointed out no longer triggers it. But, the underlying issue remains.