From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S933152AbcECBpF (ORCPT ); Mon, 2 May 2016 21:45:05 -0400 Received: from mx2.suse.de ([195.135.220.15]:43032 "EHLO mx2.suse.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S932392AbcECBpC (ORCPT ); Mon, 2 May 2016 21:45:02 -0400 Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 1/2] cgroup: apply common ancestor cgroup.procs restriction in cgroupv1 To: Tejun Heo References: <1462197681-6879-1-git-send-email-asarai@suse.de> <1462197681-6879-2-git-send-email-asarai@suse.de> <20160502160332.GQ7822@mtj.duckdns.org> Cc: Li Zefan , Johannes Weiner , cgroups@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, dev@opencontainers.org, Aleksa Sarai From: Aleksa Sarai Message-ID: <5728028F.5060906@suse.de> Date: Tue, 3 May 2016 11:44:47 +1000 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:38.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/38.7.2 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <20160502160332.GQ7822@mtj.duckdns.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org > So, you can't apply a new restriction like this retro-actively to > cgroup v1 hierarchies. Okay, understood. I'll see if it's possible to make this change safe without adding restrictions to cgroupv1 hierarchies. -- Aleksa Sarai Software Engineer (Containers) SUSE Linux GmbH https://www.cyphar.com/