From: Kishon Vijay Abraham I <kishon@ti.com>
To: "Heiko Stübner" <heiko@sntech.de>
Cc: <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>, <linux-rockchip@lists.infradead.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/3] phy: rockchip-usb: should be a child device of the GRF
Date: Tue, 3 May 2016 16:28:35 +0530 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <5728845B.8070405@ti.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1879262.vnFSl1oxpJ@diego>
On Sunday 01 May 2016 01:37 AM, Heiko Stübner wrote:
> Hi Kishon,
>
> Am Dienstag, 19. April 2016, 08:13:47 schrieb Heiko Stübner:
>> Hi Kishon.
>>
>> Am Donnerstag, 31. März 2016, 15:43:30 schrieb Heiko Stuebner:
>>> The usb-phy is fully enclosed in the general register files (GRF).
>>> Therefore as seen from the device-tree it shouldn't be a separate
>>> platform-
>>> device but instead a sub-device of the GRF - using the simply-mfd
>>> mechanism.
>>>
>>> As the usb-phy is part of the kernel for some releases now, we keep
>>> the old (and now deprecated) binding for compatibility purposes.
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Heiko Stuebner <heiko@sntech.de>
>>
>> could you look into picking this patch up for 4.7?
>>
>> Same principle as for the other phy drivers, but it's already in the kernel
>> for a while, so it gets a fallback for the old binding and can go through
>> the normal way.
>>
>> The other two (devicetree-)patches I would then simply queue for 4.8 myself
>> after you're fine with the driver-side.
>
> just saw that you already have a tag for 4.7-related phy changes since this
> afternoon, but no phy pull to Greg on lkml yet.
>
> So maybe there is still a way for this phy conversion (to be under the
> Rockchip GRF node) to make it in for 4.7 :-) ?
Looks like I've missed this before sending the pull request. Sorry about that.
Is it okay if the PHY changes also go in 4.8?
-Kishon
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2016-05-03 10:59 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2016-03-31 13:43 [PATCH 0/3] move Rockchip usbphy under the GRF mfd Heiko Stuebner
2016-03-31 13:43 ` [PATCH 1/3] phy: rockchip-usb: should be a child device of the GRF Heiko Stuebner
2016-04-19 6:13 ` Heiko Stübner
2016-04-30 20:07 ` Heiko Stübner
2016-05-03 10:58 ` Kishon Vijay Abraham I [this message]
2016-05-03 11:02 ` Heiko Stübner
2016-06-17 12:35 ` Kishon Vijay Abraham I
2016-03-31 13:43 ` [PATCH 2/3] ARM: dts: rockchip: make rk3288-grf a simple-mfd Heiko Stuebner
2016-03-31 13:43 ` [PATCH 3/3] ARM: dts: rockchip: move rk3288 usbphy under the GRF node Heiko Stuebner
2016-08-03 9:40 ` Heiko Stübner
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=5728845B.8070405@ti.com \
--to=kishon@ti.com \
--cc=heiko@sntech.de \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-rockchip@lists.infradead.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox