public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Waiman Long <waiman.long@hpe.com>
To: Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>
Cc: "Theodore Ts'o" <tytso@mit.edu>,
	Andreas Dilger <adilger.kernel@dilger.ca>,
	<linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org>, <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	Scott J Norton <scott.norton@hpe.com>,
	Douglas Hatch <doug.hatch@hpe.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH] ext4: Don't release mutex for DAX write
Date: Tue, 3 May 2016 11:58:46 -0400	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <5728CAB6.4050101@hpe.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20160503084343.GA31363@infradead.org>

On 05/03/2016 04:43 AM, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> As explained in another thread I really think we need to get DAX
> to stop pretending to be direct I/O, which should also take care
> of the locking.  The same issue also exists for ext2 and XFS so it
> needs to be solved at a higher level.

I think the DAX code was in the DIO path because it didn't want to use 
buffer cache at all. Taking DAX out from DIO will mean having a third 
mode of doing I/O which is similar to DIO in certain ways, but not 
exactly the same. There will be a certain amount of code duplication in 
this case. Do we really want to do that?

As for the locking problem, xfs doesn't seem to have issue as it uses a 
rwsem in the xfs inode for synchronization. I haven't looked into the 
ext2 code to see if there is any issue there.

Cheers,
Longman

      reply	other threads:[~2016-05-03 15:59 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2016-05-02 19:58 [RFC PATCH] ext4: Don't release mutex for DAX write Waiman Long
2016-05-03  8:43 ` Christoph Hellwig
2016-05-03 15:58   ` Waiman Long [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=5728CAB6.4050101@hpe.com \
    --to=waiman.long@hpe.com \
    --cc=adilger.kernel@dilger.ca \
    --cc=doug.hatch@hpe.com \
    --cc=hch@infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=scott.norton@hpe.com \
    --cc=tytso@mit.edu \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox