public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Kishon Vijay Abraham I <kishon@ti.com>
To: Bjorn Helgaas <helgaas@kernel.org>,
	Niklas Cassel <niklas.cassel@axis.com>
Cc: <bhelgaas@google.com>, <jszhang@marvell.com>,
	<linux-omap@vger.kernel.org>, <linux-pci@vger.kernel.org>,
	<linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>, Niklas Cassel <niklass@axis.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] PCI: dra7xx: program outbound atu with correct address
Date: Wed, 4 May 2016 10:44:09 +0530	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <57298521.1090300@ti.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20160503165059.GB30040@localhost>



On Tuesday 03 May 2016 10:20 PM, Bjorn Helgaas wrote:
> On Mon, May 02, 2016 at 04:09:33PM -0500, Bjorn Helgaas wrote:
>> On Mon, May 02, 2016 at 04:54:40PM +0200, Niklas Cassel wrote:
>>> From: Niklas Cassel <niklas.cassel@axis.com>
>>>
>>> commit 1488aefa37a4 ("PCI: designware: Move Root Complex
>>> setup code to dw_pcie_setup_rc()") broke dra7xx
>>> by moving code from dw_pcie_host_init to dw_pcie_setup_rc.
>>>
>>> Fix this by doing the cpu to bus calculation before calling
>>> dw_pcie_setup_rc.
>>>
>>> Fixes: 1488aefa37a4 ("PCI: designware: Move Root Complex setup code to dw_pcie_setup_rc()")
>>> Signed-off-by: Niklas Cassel <niklas.cassel@axis.com>
>>> ---
>>>  drivers/pci/host/pci-dra7xx.c | 4 ++--
>>>  1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>>>
>>> diff --git a/drivers/pci/host/pci-dra7xx.c b/drivers/pci/host/pci-dra7xx.c
>>> index 2ca3a1f..f441130 100644
>>> --- a/drivers/pci/host/pci-dra7xx.c
>>> +++ b/drivers/pci/host/pci-dra7xx.c
>>> @@ -142,13 +142,13 @@ static void dra7xx_pcie_enable_interrupts(struct pcie_port *pp)
>>>  
>>>  static void dra7xx_pcie_host_init(struct pcie_port *pp)
>>>  {
>>> -	dw_pcie_setup_rc(pp);
>>> -
>>>  	pp->io_base &= DRA7XX_CPU_TO_BUS_ADDR;
>>>  	pp->mem_base &= DRA7XX_CPU_TO_BUS_ADDR;
>>>  	pp->cfg0_base &= DRA7XX_CPU_TO_BUS_ADDR;
>>>  	pp->cfg1_base &= DRA7XX_CPU_TO_BUS_ADDR;
>>>  
>>> +	dw_pcie_setup_rc(pp);
>>
>> This looks correct to me.  Prior to 1488aefa37a4, we had this path,
>> which applied the dra7xx mem_base adjustment before programming the
>> outbound ATU:
>>
>>   dra7xx_add_pcie_port
>>     dw_pcie_host_init
>>       pp->mem_base = pp->mem->start                 # <-- set pp->mem_base
>>       ops->host_init
>>       dra7xx_pcie_host_init                         # .host_init
>>         dw_pcie_setup_rc
>>         pp->mem_base &= DRA7XX_CPU_TO_BUS_ADDR      # <-- update pp->mem_base
>>       dw_pcie_prog_outbound_atu(pp->mem_base)       # <-- use pp->mem_base
>>
>> After 1488aefa37a4, we have this:
>>
>>   dra7xx_add_pcie_port
>>     dw_pcie_host_init
>>       pp->mem_base = pp->mem->start                 # <-- set pp->mem_base
>>       ops->host_init
>>       dra7xx_pcie_host_init                         # .host_init
>>         dw_pcie_setup_rc
>>           dw_pcie_prog_outbound_atu(pp->mem_base)   # <-- use pp->mem_base
>>         pp->mem_base &= DRA7XX_CPU_TO_BUS_ADDR      # <-- update pp->mem_base
>>
>> So the dra7xx update is applied after we've already used it.
>>
>> If you agree, Kishon, I'll fold Niklas's fix into Jisheng's patch so
>> there's no bisection hole for dra7xx.
> 
> I merged this (folded into Jisheng's patch on the pci/host-designware
> branch, and included in my "next" branch).
> 
> Please let me know if it works for you, Niklas, or if you see any
> problems.

I did a basic ping test with a broadcom ethernet card and it worked fine.

Tested-by: Kishon Vijay Abraham I <kishon@ti.com>

> 
>>>  	dra7xx_pcie_establish_link(pp);
>>>  	if (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_PCI_MSI))
>>>  		dw_pcie_msi_init(pp);
>>> -- 
>>> 2.1.4
>>>
>>> --
>>> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-pci" in
>>> the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
>>> More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
>> --
>> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-pci" in
>> the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
>> More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

      reply	other threads:[~2016-05-04  5:14 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2016-05-02 14:54 [PATCH] PCI: dra7xx: program outbound atu with correct address Niklas Cassel
2016-05-02 21:09 ` Bjorn Helgaas
2016-05-03 16:50   ` Bjorn Helgaas
2016-05-04  5:14     ` Kishon Vijay Abraham I [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=57298521.1090300@ti.com \
    --to=kishon@ti.com \
    --cc=bhelgaas@google.com \
    --cc=helgaas@kernel.org \
    --cc=jszhang@marvell.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-omap@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-pci@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=niklas.cassel@axis.com \
    --cc=niklass@axis.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox