From: Hekuang <hekuang@huawei.com>
To: Adrian Hunter <adrian.hunter@intel.com>, <peterz@infradead.org>,
<mingo@redhat.com>, <acme@kernel.org>,
<alexander.shishkin@linux.intel.com>, <jolsa@redhat.com>,
<wangnan0@huawei.com>, <jpoimboe@redhat.com>,
<ak@linux.intel.com>, <eranian@google.com>, <namhyung@kernel.org>,
<sukadev@linux.vnet.ibm.com>, <masami.hiramatsu.pt@hitachi.com>,
<tumanova@linux.vnet.ibm.com>, <kan.liang@intel.com>,
<penberg@kernel.org>, <dsahern@gmail.com>
Cc: <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 5/9] perf tools: Add methods to test dso is 64-bit or 32-bit
Date: Tue, 10 May 2016 20:29:09 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <5731D415.8040808@huawei.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <5731CD04.3000005@intel.com>
在 2016/5/10 19:59, Adrian Hunter 写道:
> On 10/05/16 14:38, Hekuang wrote:
>>
>> 在 2016/5/10 18:34, Adrian Hunter 写道:
>>> On 10/05/16 12:49, Hekuang wrote:
>>>> hi
>>>>
>>>> 在 2016/5/10 16:08, Adrian Hunter 写道:
>>>>> On 10/05/16 10:40, He Kuang wrote:
>>>>>> 32-bit programs can be run on 64-bit machines, so we should choose
>>>>>> unwind methods according to 'thread->map' instead of the host
>>>>>> architecture.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> This patch adds methods to test whether a dso is 64-bit or 32-bit by
>>>>>> the class info in elf.
>>>>> What about using dso->is_64_bit set by dso__load_sym() ?
>>>> I've noticed this variable, but it's value is not as its name said:
>>>>
>>>> util/dso.c: 1067 dso->is_64_bit = (sizeof(void *) == 8);
>>> That is just initialization i.e. before we know what it is we assume it is
>>> the same as the host.
>>>
>>>> This is only related to the host architecture.
>>>>
>>>> A closer one is 'is_64_bit' in 'struct symsrc', but the value is assigned
>>>> after dso
>>>> loaded. So I think we should provide individual methods to get that value.
>>> Are you saying you don't load dsos? Or that is_64_bit is set incorrectly?
>>>
>> Yes, I know it's the inital value, but the correct value is
>> assigned in function dso__load_sym(), and have a look at the call
>> stack(gdb):
>>
>> #0 dso__load_sym
>> #1 in dso__load
>> #2 in map__load
>> #3 in map__find_symbol
>> #4 in thread__find_addr_location
>> #5 in entry
>> #6 in get_entries
>> #7 in _Ux86__unwind__get_entries
>> #8 in thread__resolve_callchain
>>
>> I think we should choose the right unwind method before
>> dso__load_sym(). i.e. line#7, which is called before dso__load_sym().
>>
>> I'm not very familiar with this, what's your opinion?
> Have you considered calling map__load() instead of dso_is_64_bit()
IMO, map__load() is heavy than dso_is_64_bit() test, because the
dso tested by unwind_get_arch(thread, map) may or may not be
referenced in the unwind process. For example, a thread can
have a large map but that map never appeared in the callcains
in perf.data.
Or in other words, should we load all symbols for that elf flag or
add a new method targeted for that purpose only.
Thanks.
>
>
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2016-05-10 12:30 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 25+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2016-05-10 7:40 [PATCH v2 0/9] Add support for remote unwind He Kuang
2016-05-10 7:40 ` [PATCH v2 1/9] perf tools: Omit DWARF judgement when recording dwarf callchain He Kuang
2016-05-10 13:45 ` Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2016-05-10 7:40 ` [PATCH v2 2/9] perf script: Add options for custom vdso path He Kuang
2016-05-10 13:44 ` Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2016-05-11 1:33 ` Hekuang
2016-05-10 7:40 ` [PATCH v2 3/9] perf build: Add build-test for libunwind cross-platforms support He Kuang
2016-05-11 11:52 ` Jiri Olsa
2016-05-11 13:24 ` Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2016-05-12 10:23 ` [tip:perf/core] " tip-bot for He Kuang
2016-05-10 7:40 ` [PATCH v2 4/9] perf build: Add build-test for debug-frame on arm/arm64 He Kuang
2016-05-11 11:58 ` Jiri Olsa
2016-05-11 13:24 ` Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2016-05-12 10:24 ` [tip:perf/core] " tip-bot for He Kuang
2016-05-10 7:40 ` [PATCH v2 5/9] perf tools: Add methods to test dso is 64-bit or 32-bit He Kuang
2016-05-10 8:08 ` Adrian Hunter
2016-05-10 9:49 ` Hekuang
2016-05-10 10:34 ` Adrian Hunter
2016-05-10 11:38 ` Hekuang
2016-05-10 11:59 ` Adrian Hunter
2016-05-10 12:29 ` Hekuang [this message]
2016-05-10 7:40 ` [PATCH v2 6/9] perf tools: Promote proper messages for cross-platform unwind He Kuang
2016-05-10 7:40 ` [PATCH v2 7/9] perf callchain: Add support " He Kuang
2016-05-10 7:40 ` [PATCH v2 8/9] perf callchain: Support x86 target platform He Kuang
2016-05-10 7:40 ` [PATCH v2 9/9] perf callchain: Support aarch64 cross-platform He Kuang
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=5731D415.8040808@huawei.com \
--to=hekuang@huawei.com \
--cc=acme@kernel.org \
--cc=adrian.hunter@intel.com \
--cc=ak@linux.intel.com \
--cc=alexander.shishkin@linux.intel.com \
--cc=dsahern@gmail.com \
--cc=eranian@google.com \
--cc=jolsa@redhat.com \
--cc=jpoimboe@redhat.com \
--cc=kan.liang@intel.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=masami.hiramatsu.pt@hitachi.com \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=namhyung@kernel.org \
--cc=penberg@kernel.org \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=sukadev@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=tumanova@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=wangnan0@huawei.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).