From: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
To: Yang Zhang <yang.zhang.wz@gmail.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, kvm@vger.kernel.org,
Xiao Guangrong <guangrong.xiao@linux.intel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] KVM: x86: disable MPX if host did not enable MPX XSAVE features
Date: Tue, 10 May 2016 14:38:38 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <5731D64E.2060101@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <570E15B9.5070205@gmail.com>
On 13/04/2016 11:47, Yang Zhang wrote:
> On 2016/3/24 21:07, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
>>
>>
>> On 24/03/2016 14:06, Yang Zhang wrote:
>>>
>>> I mean why not keep the old way that only activate the eager_fpu while
>>> guest sees the MPX bit in CPUID, like:
>>>
>>> vcpu->arch.eager_fpu = use_eager_fpu() && guest_cpuid_has_mpx(vcpu);
>>
>> If the host uses eager FPU you can assume that it's faster than lazy FPU.
>>
>> Paolo
>>
>>> Besides, vmx_fpu_activate is called when do vcpu_reset. So it seems no
>>> need to call fpu_activate() here again.
>
> Hi Paolo
>
> The check in kvm_update_cpuid of fpu is strange since nothing relies on
> cpuid now. How about the following change?
Ok, please post it generated by git-format-patch and with a commit message.
Thanks,
Paolo
> diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/cpuid.c b/arch/x86/kvm/cpuid.c
> index bbbaa80..da4e6ad 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/kvm/cpuid.c
> +++ b/arch/x86/kvm/cpuid.c
> @@ -114,9 +114,6 @@ int kvm_update_cpuid(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
> if (best && (best->eax & (F(XSAVES) | F(XSAVEC))))
> best->ebx = xstate_required_size(vcpu->arch.xcr0, true);
>
> - if (use_eager_fpu())
> - kvm_x86_ops->fpu_activate(vcpu);
> -
> /*
> * The existing code assumes virtual address is 48-bit in the
> canonical
> * address checks; exit if it is ever changed.
> diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/x86.c b/arch/x86/kvm/x86.c
> index 9b7798c..8f57335 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/kvm/x86.c
> +++ b/arch/x86/kvm/x86.c
> @@ -7453,6 +7453,9 @@ void kvm_vcpu_reset(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, bool
> init_event)
> vcpu->arch.regs_avail = ~0;
> vcpu->arch.regs_dirty = ~0;
>
> + if (use_eager_fpu())
> + kvm_x86_ops->fpu_activate(vcpu);
> +
> kvm_x86_ops->vcpu_reset(vcpu, init_event);
> }
>
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2016-05-10 12:38 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2016-03-08 11:44 [PATCH 0/2] KVM: x86: disable MPX if host did not enable MPX XSAVE features Paolo Bonzini
2016-03-08 11:44 ` [PATCH 1/2] " Paolo Bonzini
[not found] ` <CA+3C=r-NVn__gPVdYRSypzjfejRBgB4VVY5OpckS2QGjXnUu2Q@mail.gmail.com>
2016-03-11 12:09 ` Paolo Bonzini
2016-03-24 13:06 ` Yang Zhang
2016-03-24 13:07 ` Paolo Bonzini
2016-04-13 9:47 ` Yang Zhang
2016-05-10 12:38 ` Paolo Bonzini [this message]
2016-03-08 11:44 ` [PATCH 2/2] KVM: x86: remove eager_fpu field of struct kvm_vcpu_arch Paolo Bonzini
2016-03-10 12:28 ` [PATCH 0/2] KVM: x86: disable MPX if host did not enable MPX XSAVE features Xiao Guangrong
2016-03-10 12:30 ` Paolo Bonzini
2016-03-10 17:35 ` Ingo Molnar
2016-03-10 17:38 ` Paolo Bonzini
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=5731D64E.2060101@redhat.com \
--to=pbonzini@redhat.com \
--cc=guangrong.xiao@linux.intel.com \
--cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=yang.zhang.wz@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).