From: Lino Sanfilippo <LinoSanfilippo@gmx.de>
To: Elad Kanfi <eladkan@mellanox.com>,
Lino Sanfilippo <lsanfil@marvell.com>,
David Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
Cc: Noam Camus <noamca@mellanox.com>,
"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
"abrodkin@synopsys.com" <abrodkin@synopsys.com>,
Tal Zilcer <talz@mellanox.com>,
"netdev@vger.kernel.org" <netdev@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/2] net: nps_enet: Sync access to packet sent flag
Date: Tue, 10 May 2016 20:32:49 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <57322951.3040109@gmx.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <HE1PR0501MB20265121CBDB2D48F66D408CCD7F0@HE1PR0501MB2026.eurprd05.prod.outlook.com>
Hi Elad,
On 08.05.2016 15:44, Elad Kanfi wrote:
>
> After reviewing the code and your suggestion, it seems that we can do without the flag tx_packet_sent and therefor the first issue becomes irrelevant.
> The indication that a packet was sent is (tx_skb != NULL) , and the sequence will be:
>
> CPU A:
> 1. tx_skb = skb
> 2. wmb() /* make sure tx_skb reaches the RAM before the HW is informed and the IRQ is fired */
> 3. nps_enet_reg_set(priv, NPS_ENET_REG_TX_CTL, tx_ctrl.value); /* send frame */
>
> CPU B:
> 1. read tx_skb
> 2. if( tx_skb != NULL ) handle tx_skb
> 3. tx_skb = NULL
>
>
Ok, without the tx_packet_sent flag the code becomes simpler. But it
does not mean that we can toss the smp_rmb in the irq handler
completely. We still have to use a read barrier there to ensure that we
see the most recent value of tx_skb. E.g like this:
if (priv->tx_skb != NULL ) {
smp_rmb()
/ * handle tx_skb */
}
With both barriers in place the code should work as expected.
Regards,
Lino
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2016-05-10 18:33 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2016-04-27 13:18 [PATCH v2 0/2] Net driver bugs fix Elad Kanfi
2016-04-27 13:18 ` [PATCH v2 1/2] net: nps_enet: Sync access to packet sent flag Elad Kanfi
2016-04-27 13:56 ` Lino Sanfilippo
2016-04-28 21:11 ` David Miller
2016-05-02 10:21 ` Elad Kanfi
2016-05-02 11:15 ` Lino Sanfilippo
2016-05-08 13:44 ` Elad Kanfi
2016-05-10 18:32 ` Lino Sanfilippo [this message]
2016-04-27 13:18 ` [PATCH v2 2/2] net: nps_enet: bug fix - handle lost tx interrupts Elad Kanfi
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=57322951.3040109@gmx.de \
--to=linosanfilippo@gmx.de \
--cc=abrodkin@synopsys.com \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=eladkan@mellanox.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=lsanfil@marvell.com \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=noamca@mellanox.com \
--cc=talz@mellanox.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox