From: Ross Lagerwall <ross.lagerwall@citrix.com>
To: Juergen Gross <jgross@suse.com>, Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>,
"David Vrabel" <david.vrabel@citrix.com>
Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org>,
Boris Ostrovsky <boris.ostrovsky@oracle.com>,
Daniel Kiper <daniel.kiper@oracle.com>,
Julien Grall <julien.grall@citrix.com>,
Stefano Stabellini <stefano.stabellini@eu.citrix.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
Vitaly Kuznetsov <vkuznets@redhat.com>,
"Paul Gortmaker" <paul.gortmaker@windriver.com>,
<xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org>, <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] xen: remove incorrect forward declaration
Date: Wed, 11 May 2016 16:19:10 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <57334D6E.6000302@citrix.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <57333C1D.8070405@suse.com>
On 05/11/2016 03:05 PM, Juergen Gross wrote:
> On 11/05/16 15:07, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
>> A bugfix patch for the xen balloon driver introduced a forward
>> declaration for a static function that is conditionally compiled,
>> causing a warning if only the declaration but not the definition
>> are there:
>>
>> drivers/xen/balloon.c:154:13: error: 'release_memory_resource' declared 'static' but never defined [-Werror=unused-function]
>> static void release_memory_resource(struct resource *resource);
>>
>> This removes the declaration again and instead moves the function
>> definition to the right place, before its first caller and inside
>> of the #ifdef protecting both.
>>
>> The patch that introduced the warning is marked for stable
>> backports, so if that gets applied to 4.4, so should this one.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
>> Fixes: dfd74a1edfab ("xen/balloon: Fix crash when ballooning on x86 32 bit PAE")
>> Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
>
> So you've CC'ed Ross, who sent the very same patch just yesterday, but
> without the backport request.
>
Well it wasn't clear to me whether it should be the maintainer or the
patch submitter who should request the backport and
Documentation/SubmittingPatches is not clear about it. Regardless, the
build fix should be backported to 4.4.
--
Ross Lagerwall
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2016-05-11 15:19 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2016-05-11 13:07 [PATCH] xen: remove incorrect forward declaration Arnd Bergmann
2016-05-11 14:05 ` Juergen Gross
2016-05-11 15:19 ` Ross Lagerwall [this message]
2016-05-16 11:11 ` Stefano Stabellini
2016-05-26 10:14 ` [Xen-devel] " Julien Grall
2016-05-26 10:18 ` Stefano Stabellini
2016-05-26 10:32 ` David Vrabel
2016-05-27 21:55 ` Arnd Bergmann
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=57334D6E.6000302@citrix.com \
--to=ross.lagerwall@citrix.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=arnd@arndb.de \
--cc=boris.ostrovsky@oracle.com \
--cc=daniel.kiper@oracle.com \
--cc=david.vrabel@citrix.com \
--cc=jgross@suse.com \
--cc=julien.grall@citrix.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=paul.gortmaker@windriver.com \
--cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=stefano.stabellini@eu.citrix.com \
--cc=vkuznets@redhat.com \
--cc=xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).