From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org>
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand
	id S1752545AbcEKUOG (ORCPT <rfc822;w@1wt.eu>);
	Wed, 11 May 2016 16:14:06 -0400
Received: from mga11.intel.com ([192.55.52.93]:47211 "EHLO mga11.intel.com"
	rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP
	id S1752219AbcEKUOE (ORCPT <rfc822;linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>);
	Wed, 11 May 2016 16:14:04 -0400
X-ExtLoop1: 1
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.24,609,1455004800"; 
   d="scan'208";a="804207354"
Subject: Re: [PATCH v7 00/13] x86/xsaves: Fix XSAVES issues
To: Borislav Petkov <bp@suse.de>, Yu-cheng Yu <yu-cheng.yu@intel.com>
References: <cover.1462983817.git.yu-cheng.yu@intel.com>
 <20160511200436.GP2180@pd.tnic>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, x86@kernel.org,
        "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>, Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
        Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>, Andy Lutomirski <luto@kernel.org>,
        Sai Praneeth Prakhya <sai.praneeth.prakhya@intel.com>,
        "Ravi V. Shankar" <ravi.v.shankar@intel.com>,
        Fenghua Yu <fenghua.yu@intel.com>
From: Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@linux.intel.com>
Message-ID: <5733928B.7030909@linux.intel.com>
Date: Wed, 11 May 2016 13:14:03 -0700
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:38.0) Gecko/20100101
 Thunderbird/38.6.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <20160511200436.GP2180@pd.tnic>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
List-ID: <linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org>
X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org

On 05/11/2016 01:04 PM, Borislav Petkov wrote:
> On Wed, May 11, 2016 at 12:51:03PM -0700, Yu-cheng Yu wrote:
>> XSAVES is a kernel-mode instruction. It offers a compacted format and
>> memory-write optimization. These patches fix issues in the first
>> implementation.
> 
> do you even read my emails?!
> 
> https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20160511041741.GB2180@pd.tnic
> 
> That's the third patchset in three days! What's with the spamming?!

Borislav, if you don't want to be cc'd on these patches, then please
speak up.  I'm sure Yu-cheng would be happy not to cc you.

But, seriously, he's churning through, responding to feedback and
improving the patches quickly.  I only wish most patch authors did this.
 And, despite breaking it up into 13 pieces, there is *NOT* a lot of
code here.  There's no sane reason to wait a week between iterations.

I encouraged Yu-cheng to keep up with the current pace and not wait a
week between reposts, despite what you requested.  Sorry.  Just speak up
if you want off the cc.