From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org>
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand
	id S1752813AbcEMKZv (ORCPT <rfc822;w@1wt.eu>);
	Fri, 13 May 2016 06:25:51 -0400
Received: from foss.arm.com ([217.140.101.70]:35404 "EHLO foss.arm.com"
	rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP
	id S1751280AbcEMKZu (ORCPT <rfc822;linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>);
	Fri, 13 May 2016 06:25:50 -0400
Subject: Re: [PATCH] irqchip: nps: add 64BIT dependency
To: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>, Vineet Gupta <Vineet.Gupta1@synopsys.com>
References: <1463087038-2522527-1-git-send-email-arnd@arndb.de>
 <57358F52.706@arm.com> <573591DD.6040403@synopsys.com>
 <2976650.9K4CeZnHUc@wuerfel>
Cc: Jason Cooper <jason@lakedaemon.net>, Noam Camus <noamc@ezchip.com>,
        linux-snps-arc@lists.infradead.org,
        Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
From: Marc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@arm.com>
Organization: ARM Ltd
Message-ID: <5735ABAB.4060308@arm.com>
Date: Fri, 13 May 2016 11:25:47 +0100
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:38.0) Gecko/20100101
 Icedove/38.7.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <2976650.9K4CeZnHUc@wuerfel>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
List-ID: <linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org>
X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org

On 13/05/16 10:51, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> On Friday 13 May 2016 14:05:41 Vineet Gupta wrote:
>> On Friday 13 May 2016 01:54 PM, Marc Zyngier wrote:
>>> On 12/05/16 22:03, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
>> ...
>>>>  
>>>>  config EZNPS_GIC
>>>>      bool "NPS400 Global Interrupt Manager (GIM)"
>>>> +    depends on ARC || (COMPILE_TEST && !64BIT)
>>>>      select IRQ_DOMAIN
>>>>      help
>>>>        Support the EZchip NPS400 global interrupt controller
>>>>
>>>
>>> Acked-by: Marc Zyngier <narc.zyngier@arm.com>
>>>
>>> As I've already started collecting fixes that are aimed at -rc1 (mostly
>>> to avoid dependencies), I can queue that as well.
>>
>> There is a slight logistics issue here - as agreed the driver will go in 4.7-rc1
>> via ARC tree. So either I pick the fix for rc1 or you apply it post rc1 - or
>> towards the end of rc1 ?
>>
> 
> I'd say the best option is to have you pick up the fix for the ARC tree,
> but either way works.

That'd work for me too (I've acked it anyway). Just let me know what you
decide to do.

Thanks,

	M.
-- 
Jazz is not dead. It just smells funny...