Re: [RFC 04/13] mm, page_alloc: restructure direct compaction handling in slowpath

Michal Hocko
2016-05-12T13:29:25Z

On Tue 10-05-16 09:35:54, Vlastimil Babka wrote:
> The retry loop in __alloc_pages_slowpath is supposed to keep trying reclaim
> and compaction (and OOM), until either the allocation succeeds, or returns
> with failure. Success here is more probable when reclaim precedes compaction,
> as certain watermarks have to be met for compaction to even try, and more free
> pages increase the probability of compaction success. On the other hand,
> starting with light async compaction (if the watermarks allow it), can be
> more efficient, especially for smaller orders, if there's enough free memory
> which is just fragmented.
>
> Thus, the current code starts with compaction before reclaim, and to make sure
> that the last reclaim is always followed by a final compaction, there's another
> direct compaction call at the end of the loop. This makes the code hard to
> follow and adds some duplicated handling of migration_mode decisions. It's also
> somewhat inefficient that even if reclaim or compaction decides not to retry,
> the final compaction is still attempted. Some gfp flags combination also
> shortcut these retry decisions by "goto noretry;", making it even harder to
> follow.

I completely agree. It was a head scratcher to properly handle all the
potential paths when I was reorganizing the code for the oom detection
rework.

> This patch attempts to restructure the code with only minimal functional
> changes. The call to the first compaction and THP-specific checks are now
> placed above the retry loop, and the "noretry" direct compaction is removed.
>
> The initial compaction is additionally restricted only to costly orders, as we
> can expect smaller orders to be held back by watermarks, and only larger orders
> to suffer primarily from fragmentation. This better matches the checks in
> reclaim's shrink_zones().
>
> There are two other smaller functional changes. One is that the upgrade from
> async migration to light sync migration will always occur after the initial
> compaction.

I do not think this belongs to the patch. There are two reasons. First
we do not need to do potentially more expensive sync mode when async is
able to make some progress and the second is that with the currently
fragile compaction implementation this might reintroduce the premature
OOM for order-2 requests reported by Hugh. Please see
http://lkml.kernel.org/r/alpine.LSU.2.11.1604141114290.1086@eggly.anvils

Your later patch (which I haven't reviewed yet) is then changing this
considerably but I think it would be safer to not touch the migration
mode in this - mostly cleanup - patch.

> This is how it has been until recent patch "mm, oom: protect
> !costly allocations some more", which introduced upgrading the mode based on
> COMPACT_COMPLETE result, but kept the final compaction always upgraded, which
> made it even more special. It's better to return to the simpler handling for
> now, as migration modes will be further modified later in the series.
>
> The second change is that once both reclaim and compaction declare it's not
> worth to retry the reclaim/compact loop, there is no final compaction attempt.
> As argued above, this is intentional. If that final compaction were to succeed,
> it would be due to a wrong retry decision, or simply a race with somebody else
> freeing memory for us.
>
> The main outcome of this patch should be simpler code. Logically, the initial
> compaction without reclaim is the exceptional case to the reclaim/compaction
> scheme, but prior to the patch, it was the last loop iteration that was
> exceptional. Now the code matches the logic better. The change also enable the
> following patches.
>
> Signed-off-by: Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@suse.cz>

Other than the above thing I like this patch.
Acked-by: Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.com>

> ---
> mm/page_alloc.c | 107 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++---------------------------
> 1 file changed, 55 insertions(+), 52 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/mm/page_alloc.c b/mm/page_alloc.c
> index 7249949d65ca..88d680b3e7b6 100644
> --- a/mm/page_alloc.c
> +++ b/mm/page_alloc.c
> @@ -3555,7 +3555,7 @@ __alloc_pages_slowpath(gfp_t gfp_mask, unsigned int order,
> struct page *page = NULL;
> unsigned int alloc_flags;
> unsigned long did_some_progress;
> - enum migrate_mode migration_mode = MIGRATE_ASYNC;
> + enum migrate_mode migration_mode = MIGRATE_SYNC_LIGHT;
> enum compact_result compact_result;
> int compaction_retries = 0;
> int no_progress_loops = 0;
> @@ -3598,6 +3598,50 @@ __alloc_pages_slowpath(gfp_t gfp_mask, unsigned int order,
> if (page)
> goto got_pg;
>
> + /*
> + * For costly allocations, try direct compaction first, as it's likely
> + * that we have enough base pages and don't need to reclaim.
> + */
> + if (can_direct_reclaim && order > PAGE_ALLOC_COSTLY_ORDER) {
> + page = __alloc_pages_direct_compact(gfp_mask, order,
> + alloc_flags, ac,
> + MIGRATE_ASYNC,
> + &compact_result);
> + if (page)
> + goto got_pg;
> +
> + /* Checks for THP-specific high-order allocations */
> + if (is_thp_gfp_mask(gfp_mask)) {
> + /*
> + * If compaction is deferred for high-order allocations,
> + * it is because sync compaction recently failed. If
> + * this is the case and the caller requested a THP
> + * allocation, we do not want to heavily disrupt the
> + * system, so we fail the allocation instead of entering
> + * direct reclaim.
> + */
> + if (compact_result == COMPACT_DEFERRED)
> + goto nopage;
> +
> + /*
> + * Compaction is contended so rather back off than cause
> + * excessive stalls.
> + */
> + if (compact_result == COMPACT_CONTENDED)
> + goto nopage;
> +
> + /*
> + * It can become very expensive to allocate transparent
> + * hugepages at fault, so use asynchronous memory
> + * compaction for THP unless it is khugepaged trying to
> + * collapse. All other requests should tolerate at
> + * least light sync migration.
> + */
> + if (!(current->flags & PF_KTHREAD))
> + migration_mode = MIGRATE_ASYNC;
> + }
> + }
> +
> retry:
> /* Ensure kswapd doesn't accidentaly go to sleep as long as we loop */
> if (gfp_mask & __GFP_KSWAPD_RECLAIM)
> @@ -3646,55 +3690,33 @@ __alloc_pages_slowpath(gfp_t gfp_mask, unsigned int order,
> if (test_thread_flag(TIF_MEMDIE) && !(gfp_mask & __GFP_NOFAIL))
> goto nopage;
>
> - /*
> - * Try direct compaction. The first pass is asynchronous. Subsequent
> - * attempts after direct reclaim are synchronous
> - */
> +
> + /* Try direct reclaim and then allocating */
> + page = __alloc_pages_direct_reclaim(gfp_mask, order, alloc_flags, ac,
> + &did_some_progress);
> + if (page)
> + goto got_pg;
> +
> + /* Try direct compaction and then allocating */
> page = __alloc_pages_direct_compact(gfp_mask, order, alloc_flags, ac,
> migration_mode,
> &compact_result);
> if (page)
> goto got_pg;
>
> - /* Checks for THP-specific high-order allocations */
> - if (is_thp_gfp_mask(gfp_mask)) {
> - /*
> - * If compaction is deferred for high-order allocations, it is
> - * because sync compaction recently failed. If this is the case
> - * and the caller requested a THP allocation, we do not want
> - * to heavily disrupt the system, so we fail the allocation
> - * instead of entering direct reclaim.
> - */
> - if (compact_result == COMPACT_DEFERRED)
> - goto nopage;
> -
> - /*
> - * Compaction is contended so rather back off than cause
> - * excessive stalls.
> - */
> - if(compact_result == COMPACT_CONTENDED)
> - goto nopage;
> - }
> -
> if (order && compaction_made_progress(compact_result))
> compaction_retries++;
>
> - /* Try direct reclaim and then allocating */
> - page = __alloc_pages_direct_reclaim(gfp_mask, order, alloc_flags, ac,
> - &did_some_progress);
> - if (page)
> - goto got_pg;
> -
> /* Do not loop if specifically requested */
> if (gfp_mask & __GFP_NORETRY)
> - goto noretry;
> + goto nopage;
>
> /*
> * Do not retry costly high order allocations unless they are
> * __GFP_REPEAT
> */
> if (order > PAGE_ALLOC_COSTLY_ORDER && !(gfp_mask & __GFP_REPEAT))
> - goto noretry;
> + goto nopage;
>
> /*
> * Costly allocations might have made a progress but this doesn't mean
> @@ -3733,25 +3755,6 @@ __alloc_pages_slowpath(gfp_t gfp_mask, unsigned int order,
> goto retry;
> }
>
> -noretry:
> - /*
> - * High-order allocations do not necessarily loop after direct reclaim
> - * and reclaim/compaction depends on compaction being called after
> - * reclaim so call directly if necessary.
> - * It can become very expensive to allocate transparent hugepages at
> - * fault, so use asynchronous memory compaction for THP unless it is
> - * khugepaged trying to collapse. All other requests should tolerate
> - * at least light sync migration.
> - */
> - if (is_thp_gfp_mask(gfp_mask) && !(current->flags & PF_KTHREAD))
> - migration_mode = MIGRATE_ASYNC;
> - else
> - migration_mode = MIGRATE_SYNC_LIGHT;
> - page = __alloc_pages_direct_compact(gfp_mask, order, alloc_flags,
> - ac, migration_mode,
> - &compact_result);
> - if (page)
> - goto got_pg;
> nopage:
> warn_alloc_failed(gfp_mask, order, NULL);
> got_pg:
> --
> 2.8.2
>
> --
> To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
> the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM,
> see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
> Don't email: email@kvack.org

--
Michal Hocko
SUSE Labs