From: Boris Ostrovsky <boris.ostrovsky@oracle.com>
To: Stefano Stabellini <sstabellini@kernel.org>
Cc: David Vrabel <david.vrabel@citrix.com>,
Juergen Gross <jgross@suse.com>,
Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk <konrad.wilk@oracle.com>,
xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH] xen/x86: actually allocate legacy interrupts on PV guests
Date: Mon, 16 May 2016 09:57:50 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <5739D1DE.2000200@oracle.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <alpine.DEB.2.10.1605161221350.2494@sstabellini-ThinkPad-X260>
On 05/16/2016 07:23 AM, Stefano Stabellini wrote:
> On Wed, 27 Apr 2016, Boris Ostrovsky wrote:
>> On 04/27/2016 09:40 AM, David Vrabel wrote:
>>> On 27/04/16 14:38, Boris Ostrovsky wrote:
>>>> int xen_nr_legacy_irqs()
>>>> {
>>>> if (xen_hvm_domain())
>>>> return nr_legacy_irqs();
>>>> if (xen_initial_domain())
>>>> return NR_IRQS_LEGACY;
>>>> return 0;
>>>> }
>>> Yeah, if that does the right thing...
>> I think it will break xen_allocate_irq_gsi() again, unless we check for HVM
>> domain explicitly. Which would be ugly.
> I guess we all forgot about this patch, in the meantime the merge window
> has opened.
>
> Should we go ahead with:
>
> http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=146115812124261&w=2
>
> ?
> It might not be complete, but it is certainly an improvement.
Yes, I think what you have there is the best option. What I suggested
above won't work and adding another check for HVM domain in
xen_allocate_irq_gsi() won't look good (although it does work).
It will need to go to stable as well (4.4+ ?)
-boris
>
> Otherwise, please submit proper patches ASAP. I don't think we want to
> delay this fix until 4.8.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2016-05-16 13:58 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2016-04-20 13:15 [PATCH] xen/x86: actually allocate legacy interrupts on PV guests Stefano Stabellini
2016-04-21 9:08 ` Juergen Gross
2016-04-21 9:30 ` Stefano Stabellini
2016-04-27 5:02 ` Juergen Gross
2016-04-27 9:35 ` [Xen-devel] " David Vrabel
2016-04-27 13:38 ` Boris Ostrovsky
2016-04-27 13:40 ` David Vrabel
2016-04-27 14:03 ` Boris Ostrovsky
2016-05-16 11:23 ` Stefano Stabellini
2016-05-16 13:57 ` Boris Ostrovsky [this message]
2016-05-16 15:21 ` Stefano Stabellini
2016-04-21 11:02 ` Olaf Hering
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=5739D1DE.2000200@oracle.com \
--to=boris.ostrovsky@oracle.com \
--cc=david.vrabel@citrix.com \
--cc=jgross@suse.com \
--cc=konrad.wilk@oracle.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=sstabellini@kernel.org \
--cc=xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).