From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1753527AbcEPN6J (ORCPT ); Mon, 16 May 2016 09:58:09 -0400 Received: from aserp1040.oracle.com ([141.146.126.69]:42783 "EHLO aserp1040.oracle.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751738AbcEPN6I (ORCPT ); Mon, 16 May 2016 09:58:08 -0400 Subject: Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH] xen/x86: actually allocate legacy interrupts on PV guests To: Stefano Stabellini References: <57189880.6030102@suse.com> <572047D3.1000002@suse.com> <572087E0.4030708@citrix.com> <5720C0E2.8080904@oracle.com> <5720C14A.1070707@citrix.com> <5720C6A8.7090806@oracle.com> Cc: David Vrabel , Juergen Gross , Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk , xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org From: Boris Ostrovsky Message-ID: <5739D1DE.2000200@oracle.com> Date: Mon, 16 May 2016 09:57:50 -0400 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:38.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/38.1.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Source-IP: userv0022.oracle.com [156.151.31.74] Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On 05/16/2016 07:23 AM, Stefano Stabellini wrote: > On Wed, 27 Apr 2016, Boris Ostrovsky wrote: >> On 04/27/2016 09:40 AM, David Vrabel wrote: >>> On 27/04/16 14:38, Boris Ostrovsky wrote: >>>> int xen_nr_legacy_irqs() >>>> { >>>> if (xen_hvm_domain()) >>>> return nr_legacy_irqs(); >>>> if (xen_initial_domain()) >>>> return NR_IRQS_LEGACY; >>>> return 0; >>>> } >>> Yeah, if that does the right thing... >> I think it will break xen_allocate_irq_gsi() again, unless we check for HVM >> domain explicitly. Which would be ugly. > I guess we all forgot about this patch, in the meantime the merge window > has opened. > > Should we go ahead with: > > http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=146115812124261&w=2 > > ? > It might not be complete, but it is certainly an improvement. Yes, I think what you have there is the best option. What I suggested above won't work and adding another check for HVM domain in xen_allocate_irq_gsi() won't look good (although it does work). It will need to go to stable as well (4.4+ ?) -boris > > Otherwise, please submit proper patches ASAP. I don't think we want to > delay this fix until 4.8.