public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
To: Suravee Suthikulpanit <Suravee.Suthikulpanit@amd.com>,
	rkrcmar@redhat.com, joro@8bytes.org, bp@alien8.de,
	gleb@kernel.org, alex.williamson@redhat.com
Cc: kvm@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	wei@redhat.com, sherry.hurwitz@amd.com
Subject: Re: [PART1 V5 13/13] svm: Manage vcpu load/unload when enable AVIC
Date: Tue, 17 May 2016 14:09:44 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <573B0A08.7040604@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <573201AB.2050006@redhat.com>



On 10/05/2016 17:43, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
> 
> 
> On 04/05/2016 21:09, Suravee Suthikulpanit wrote:
>> From: Suravee Suthikulpanit <suravee.suthikulpanit@amd.com>
>>
>> When a vcpu is loaded/unloaded to a physical core, we need to update
>> host physical APIC ID information in the Physical APIC-ID table
>> accordingly.
>>
>> Also, when vCPU is blocking/un-blocking (due to halt instruction),
>> we need to make sure that the is-running bit in set accordingly in the
>> physical APIC-ID table.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Suravee Suthikulpanit <suravee.suthikulpanit@amd.com>
>> Reviewed-by: Radim Krčmář <rkrcmar@redhat.com>
>> ---
> 
> I think this is the only patch that needs a little more work, because 
> there are a bunch of unused return values that really should be 
> WARN_ON.  In addition the load and put cases are different enough that 
> they should be separate functions.
> 
> Can you please test this?
> 
> diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/svm.c b/arch/x86/kvm/svm.c
> index f3dbf1d33a61..3168d6c8d24f 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/kvm/svm.c
> +++ b/arch/x86/kvm/svm.c
> @@ -184,7 +184,7 @@ struct vcpu_svm {
>  	u32 ldr_reg;
>  	struct page *avic_backing_page;
>  	u64 *avic_physical_id_cache;
> -	bool avic_is_blocking;
> +	bool avic_is_running;
>  };
>  
>  #define AVIC_LOGICAL_ID_ENTRY_GUEST_PHYSICAL_ID_MASK	(0xFF)
> @@ -1321,18 +1321,20 @@ free_avic:
>  /**
>   * This function is called during VCPU halt/unhalt.
>   */
> -static int avic_set_running(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, bool is_run)
> +static void avic_set_running(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, bool is_run)
>  {
>  	u64 entry;
>  	int h_physical_id = __default_cpu_present_to_apicid(vcpu->cpu);
>  	struct vcpu_svm *svm = to_svm(vcpu);
>  
>  	if (!kvm_vcpu_apicv_active(vcpu))
> -		return 0;
> +		return;
> +
> +	svm->avic_is_running = is_run;
>  
>  	/* ID = 0xff (broadcast), ID > 0xff (reserved) */
> -	if (h_physical_id >= AVIC_MAX_PHYSICAL_ID_COUNT)
> -		return -EINVAL;
> +	if (WARN_ON(h_physical_id >= AVIC_MAX_PHYSICAL_ID_COUNT))
> +		return;
>  
>  	entry = READ_ONCE(*(svm->avic_physical_id_cache));
>  	WARN_ON(is_run == !!(entry & AVIC_PHYSICAL_ID_ENTRY_IS_RUNNING_MASK));
> @@ -1341,36 +1343,45 @@ static int avic_set_running(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, bool is_run)
>  	if (is_run)
>  		entry |= AVIC_PHYSICAL_ID_ENTRY_IS_RUNNING_MASK;
>  	WRITE_ONCE(*(svm->avic_physical_id_cache), entry);
> -
> -	return 0;
>  }
>  
> -static int avic_vcpu_load(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, int cpu, bool is_load)
> +static void avic_vcpu_load(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, int cpu)
>  {
>  	u64 entry;
> +	/* ID = 0xff (broadcast), ID > 0xff (reserved) */
>  	int h_physical_id = __default_cpu_present_to_apicid(cpu);
>  	struct vcpu_svm *svm = to_svm(vcpu);
>  
>  	if (!kvm_vcpu_apicv_active(vcpu))
> -		return 0;
> +		return;
>  
> -	/* ID = 0xff (broadcast), ID > 0xff (reserved) */
> -	if (h_physical_id >= AVIC_MAX_PHYSICAL_ID_COUNT)
> -		return -EINVAL;
> +	if (WARN_ON(h_physical_id >= AVIC_MAX_PHYSICAL_ID_COUNT))
> +		return;
>  
>  	entry = READ_ONCE(*(svm->avic_physical_id_cache));
> -	WARN_ON(is_load && (entry & AVIC_PHYSICAL_ID_ENTRY_IS_RUNNING_MASK));
> +	WARN_ON(entry & AVIC_PHYSICAL_ID_ENTRY_IS_RUNNING_MASK);
> +
> +	entry &= ~AVIC_PHYSICAL_ID_ENTRY_HOST_PHYSICAL_ID_MASK;
> +	entry |= (h_physical_id & AVIC_PHYSICAL_ID_ENTRY_HOST_PHYSICAL_ID_MASK);
>  
>  	entry &= ~AVIC_PHYSICAL_ID_ENTRY_IS_RUNNING_MASK;
> -	if (is_load) {
> -		entry &= ~AVIC_PHYSICAL_ID_ENTRY_HOST_PHYSICAL_ID_MASK;
> -		entry |= (h_physical_id & AVIC_PHYSICAL_ID_ENTRY_HOST_PHYSICAL_ID_MASK);
> -		if (!svm->avic_is_blocking)
> -			entry |= AVIC_PHYSICAL_ID_ENTRY_IS_RUNNING_MASK;
> -	}
> +	if (svm->avic_is_running)
> +		entry |= AVIC_PHYSICAL_ID_ENTRY_IS_RUNNING_MASK;
> +
>  	WRITE_ONCE(*(svm->avic_physical_id_cache), entry);
> +}
>  
> -	return 0;
> +static void avic_vcpu_put(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
> +{
> +	u64 entry;
> +	struct vcpu_svm *svm = to_svm(vcpu);
> +
> +	if (!kvm_vcpu_apicv_active(vcpu))
> +		return;
> +
> +	entry = READ_ONCE(*(svm->avic_physical_id_cache));
> +	entry &= ~AVIC_PHYSICAL_ID_ENTRY_IS_RUNNING_MASK;
> +	WRITE_ONCE(*(svm->avic_physical_id_cache), entry);
>  }
>  
>  static void svm_vcpu_reset(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, bool init_event)
> @@ -1436,10 +1447,10 @@ static struct kvm_vcpu *svm_create_vcpu(struct kvm *kvm, unsigned int id)
>  			goto free_page4;
>  	}
>  
> -	/* We initialize this flag to one to make sure that the is_running
> +	/* We initialize this flag to true to make sure that the is_running
>  	 * bit would be set the first time the vcpu is loaded.
>  	 */
> -	svm->avic_is_blocking = false;
> +	svm->avic_is_running = true;
>  
>  	svm->nested.hsave = page_address(hsave_page);
>  
> @@ -1518,7 +1529,7 @@ static void svm_vcpu_load(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, int cpu)
>  	if (static_cpu_has(X86_FEATURE_RDTSCP))
>  		wrmsrl(MSR_TSC_AUX, svm->tsc_aux);
>  
> -	avic_vcpu_load(vcpu, cpu, true);
> +	avic_vcpu_load(vcpu, cpu);
>  }
>  
>  static void svm_vcpu_put(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
> @@ -1526,7 +1537,7 @@ static void svm_vcpu_put(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
>  	struct vcpu_svm *svm = to_svm(vcpu);
>  	int i;
>  
> -	avic_vcpu_load(vcpu, 0, false);
> +	avic_vcpu_put(vcpu);
>  
>  	++vcpu->stat.host_state_reload;
>  	kvm_load_ldt(svm->host.ldt);
> @@ -1545,13 +1556,11 @@ static void svm_vcpu_put(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
>  
>  static void svm_vcpu_blocking(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
>  {
> -	to_svm(vcpu)->avic_is_blocking = true;
>  	avic_set_running(vcpu, false);
>  }
>  
>  static void svm_vcpu_unblocking(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
>  {
> -	to_svm(vcpu)->avic_is_blocking = false;
>  	avic_set_running(vcpu, true);
>  }
>  
> 
> The two functions now have the same signature as their callers,
> svm_vcpu_load and svm_vcpu_put.

Radim, does this look sane?  I plan to include it in my pull request
(I'm running AMD autotest now and it passed the first few tests).

Thanks,

Paolo

  reply	other threads:[~2016-05-17 12:09 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 29+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2016-05-04 19:09 [PART1 V5 00/13] KVM: x86: Introduce SVM AVIC support Suravee Suthikulpanit
2016-05-04 19:09 ` [PART1 V5 01/13] KVM: x86: Misc LAPIC changes to expose helper functions Suravee Suthikulpanit
2016-05-04 19:09 ` [PART1 V5 02/13] KVM: x86: Rename kvm_apic_get_reg to kvm_lapic_get_reg Suravee Suthikulpanit
2016-05-04 19:09 ` [PART1 V5 03/13] KVM: x86: Introducing kvm_x86_ops VM init/destroy hooks Suravee Suthikulpanit
2016-05-04 19:09 ` [PART1 V5 04/13] KVM: x86: Introducing kvm_x86_ops VCPU blocking/unblocking hooks Suravee Suthikulpanit
2016-05-04 19:09 ` [PART1 V5 05/13] KVM: split kvm_vcpu_wake_up from kvm_vcpu_kick Suravee Suthikulpanit
2016-05-04 19:09 ` [PART1 V5 06/13] svm: Introduce new AVIC VMCB registers Suravee Suthikulpanit
2016-05-04 19:09 ` [PART1 V5 07/13] KVM: x86: Detect and Initialize AVIC support Suravee Suthikulpanit
2016-05-09 10:27   ` Borislav Petkov
2016-05-10  9:14   ` Borislav Petkov
2016-05-10 14:43     ` Paolo Bonzini
2016-05-10 16:24       ` Borislav Petkov
2016-05-10 17:00         ` Paolo Bonzini
2016-05-10 17:06           ` Borislav Petkov
2016-05-04 19:09 ` [PART1 V5 08/13] svm: Add interrupt injection via AVIC Suravee Suthikulpanit
2016-05-10  9:19   ` Borislav Petkov
2016-05-10 14:50     ` Paolo Bonzini
2016-06-01  4:02       ` Suravee Suthikulpanit
2016-05-04 19:09 ` [PART1 V5 09/13] svm: Add VMEXIT handlers for AVIC Suravee Suthikulpanit
2016-05-04 19:09 ` [PART1 V5 10/13] KVM: x86: Introducing kvm_x86_ops.apicv_post_state_restore Suravee Suthikulpanit
2016-05-04 19:09 ` [PART1 V5 11/13] svm: Do not expose x2APIC when enable AVIC Suravee Suthikulpanit
2016-05-04 19:09 ` [PART1 V5 12/13] svm: Do not intercept CR8 " Suravee Suthikulpanit
2016-05-10 15:12   ` Paolo Bonzini
2016-05-04 19:09 ` [PART1 V5 13/13] svm: Manage vcpu load/unload " Suravee Suthikulpanit
2016-05-10 15:43   ` Paolo Bonzini
2016-05-17 12:09     ` Paolo Bonzini [this message]
2016-06-01 18:18       ` Suravee Suthikulpanit
2016-06-01 18:37         ` Paolo Bonzini
2016-05-10 14:57 ` [PART1 V5 00/13] KVM: x86: Introduce SVM AVIC support Paolo Bonzini

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=573B0A08.7040604@redhat.com \
    --to=pbonzini@redhat.com \
    --cc=Suravee.Suthikulpanit@amd.com \
    --cc=alex.williamson@redhat.com \
    --cc=bp@alien8.de \
    --cc=gleb@kernel.org \
    --cc=joro@8bytes.org \
    --cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=rkrcmar@redhat.com \
    --cc=sherry.hurwitz@amd.com \
    --cc=wei@redhat.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox