public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Tommaso Cucinotta <tommaso.cucinotta@sssup.it>
To: luca abeni <luca.abeni@unitn.it>
Cc: linux-kernel <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
	Juri Lelli <juri.lelli@gmail.com>,
	mingo@redhat.com
Subject: Re: SCHED_DEADLINE cpudeadline.{h,c} fixup
Date: Wed, 18 May 2016 00:43:14 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <573B9E82.3040502@sssup.it> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20160517134655.266c7201@utopia>

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 714 bytes --]

On 17/05/2016 13:46, luca abeni wrote:
> Maybe the ... change can be split in a separate
> patch, which is a bugfix (and IMHO uncontroversial)?

Ok, the bugfix alone might look like the attached. Couldn't avoid
the little refactoring of the multiple occurrences of the same loop
up the heap into the heapify_up(), mirroring the heapify() that was
already there (renamed heapify_down() for clarity).

I'll rebase the speed-up patch on top of this, if it's a better approach.

Anyone with further comments?

Thanks again!

	T.
-- 
Tommaso Cucinotta, Computer Engineering PhD
Associate Professor at the Real-Time Systems Laboratory (ReTiS)
Scuola Superiore Sant'Anna, Pisa, Italy
http://retis.sssup.it/people/tommaso

[-- Attachment #2: 0001-Deadline-wrap-around-bugfix-for-the-SCHED_DEADLINE-c.patch --]
[-- Type: text/x-patch, Size: 2688 bytes --]

>From cfaa75eb77843f7da875a54c7e6631b271bf0663 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Tommaso Cucinotta <tommaso.cucinotta@sssup.it>
Date: Tue, 17 May 2016 15:54:11 +0200
Subject: [PATCH] Deadline wrap-around bugfix for the SCHED_DEADLINE cpu heap.

---
 kernel/sched/cpudeadline.c | 38 +++++++++++++++++++-------------------
 1 file changed, 19 insertions(+), 19 deletions(-)

diff --git a/kernel/sched/cpudeadline.c b/kernel/sched/cpudeadline.c
index 5be5882..3c42702 100644
--- a/kernel/sched/cpudeadline.c
+++ b/kernel/sched/cpudeadline.c
@@ -41,7 +41,7 @@ static void cpudl_exchange(struct cpudl *cp, int a, int b)
 	swap(cp->elements[cpu_a].idx, cp->elements[cpu_b].idx);
 }
 
-static void cpudl_heapify(struct cpudl *cp, int idx)
+static void cpudl_heapify_down(struct cpudl *cp, int idx)
 {
 	int l, r, largest;
 
@@ -66,20 +66,25 @@ static void cpudl_heapify(struct cpudl *cp, int idx)
 	}
 }
 
+static void cpudl_heapify_up(struct cpudl *cp, int idx)
+{
+	while (idx > 0 && dl_time_before(cp->elements[parent(idx)].dl,
+			cp->elements[idx].dl)) {
+		cpudl_exchange(cp, idx, parent(idx));
+		idx = parent(idx);
+	}
+}
+
 static void cpudl_change_key(struct cpudl *cp, int idx, u64 new_dl)
 {
 	WARN_ON(idx == IDX_INVALID || !cpu_present(idx));
 
 	if (dl_time_before(new_dl, cp->elements[idx].dl)) {
 		cp->elements[idx].dl = new_dl;
-		cpudl_heapify(cp, idx);
+		cpudl_heapify_down(cp, idx);
 	} else {
 		cp->elements[idx].dl = new_dl;
-		while (idx > 0 && dl_time_before(cp->elements[parent(idx)].dl,
-					cp->elements[idx].dl)) {
-			cpudl_exchange(cp, idx, parent(idx));
-			idx = parent(idx);
-		}
+		cpudl_heapify_up(cp, idx);
 	}
 }
 
@@ -154,24 +159,19 @@ void cpudl_set(struct cpudl *cp, int cpu, u64 dl, int is_valid)
 		cp->size--;
 		cp->elements[new_cpu].idx = old_idx;
 		cp->elements[cpu].idx = IDX_INVALID;
-		while (old_idx > 0 && dl_time_before(
-				cp->elements[parent(old_idx)].dl,
-				cp->elements[old_idx].dl)) {
-			cpudl_exchange(cp, old_idx, parent(old_idx));
-			old_idx = parent(old_idx);
-		}
+		cpudl_heapify_up(cp, old_idx);
 		cpumask_set_cpu(cpu, cp->free_cpus);
-                cpudl_heapify(cp, old_idx);
+                cpudl_heapify_down(cp, old_idx);
 
 		goto out;
 	}
 
 	if (old_idx == IDX_INVALID) {
-		cp->size++;
-		cp->elements[cp->size - 1].dl = 0;
-		cp->elements[cp->size - 1].cpu = cpu;
-		cp->elements[cpu].idx = cp->size - 1;
-		cpudl_change_key(cp, cp->size - 1, dl);
+		int size1 = cp->size++;
+		cp->elements[size1].dl = dl;
+		cp->elements[size1].cpu = cpu;
+		cp->elements[cpu].idx = size1;
+		cpudl_heapify_up(cp, size1);
 		cpumask_clear_cpu(cpu, cp->free_cpus);
 	} else {
 		cpudl_change_key(cp, old_idx, dl);
-- 
2.7.4


  reply	other threads:[~2016-05-17 22:43 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2016-05-16 16:00 SCHED_DEADLINE cpudeadline.{h,c} fixup Tommaso Cucinotta
2016-05-17 11:46 ` luca abeni
2016-05-17 22:43   ` Tommaso Cucinotta [this message]
2016-05-18 14:22     ` Juri Lelli
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2016-05-19 16:02 Tommaso Cucinotta
2016-07-19  9:44 Tommaso Cucinotta
     [not found] <1468880275-4338-1-git-send-email-tommaso.cucinotta@sssup.it>
2016-08-14 14:27 ` Tommaso Cucinotta
2016-08-19 12:58   ` Peter Zijlstra

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=573B9E82.3040502@sssup.it \
    --to=tommaso.cucinotta@sssup.it \
    --cc=juri.lelli@gmail.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=luca.abeni@unitn.it \
    --cc=mingo@redhat.com \
    --cc=peterz@infradead.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox