From: Srinivas Kandagatla <srinivas.kandagatla@linaro.org>
To: Alan Stern <stern@rowland.harvard.edu>
Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>,
linux-usb@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
andy.gross@linaro.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] usb: echi-hcd: Add register access check in shutdown
Date: Wed, 18 May 2016 16:33:20 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <573C8B40.1040503@linaro.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.44L0.1605181044460.1981-100000@iolanthe.rowland.org>
On 18/05/16 15:56, Alan Stern wrote:
> On Wed, 18 May 2016, Srinivas Kandagatla wrote:
>
>> This patch adds a check in ehci_shutdown(), to make sure
>> that the register access is available before accessing registers.
>>
>> The use case is simple, for boards like DB410c where the usb host
>> or device functionality is decided based on the micro-usb cable
>> presence. If the board boots up with micro-usb connected and the
>> host driver is probed, but the ehci_setup() has not been done yet,
>> then a system shutdown would trigger below NULL pointer exception
>> without this patch.
>
> How can that happen? While the host driver is probed, the probing
> thread holds the device lock. But the system shutdown routine acquires
> the device lock before invoking the ->shutdown callback. Therefore the
> two things cannot happen concurrently.
No, I did not mean them happening concurrently, I mean that the host
driver is up, however ehci_setup() is not done yet.
Will change the comments if its misleading the reader.
>
>> Unable to handle kernel NULL pointer dereference at virtual address
>> 00000008
>
> ...
>
>> --- a/drivers/usb/host/ehci-hcd.c
>> +++ b/drivers/usb/host/ehci-hcd.c
>> @@ -368,6 +368,9 @@ static void ehci_shutdown(struct usb_hcd *hcd)
>> {
>> struct ehci_hcd *ehci = hcd_to_ehci(hcd);
>>
>> + if (!HCD_HW_ACCESSIBLE(hcd))
>> + return;
>> +
>> spin_lock_irq(&ehci->lock);
>> ehci->shutdown = true;
>> ehci->rh_state = EHCI_RH_STOPPING;
>
> This doesn't seem like the right place. What you really should do is
> skip calling ehci_silence_controller() if the hardware isn't
> accessible. That's where the hardware gets touched, not in
> ehci_shutdown().
Yep , that should work as well.
Will send a v2 patch.
thanks,
srini
>
> Alan Stern
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2016-05-18 15:33 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2016-05-18 14:12 [PATCH] usb: echi-hcd: Add register access check in shutdown Srinivas Kandagatla
2016-05-18 14:56 ` Alan Stern
2016-05-18 15:33 ` Srinivas Kandagatla [this message]
2016-05-18 16:15 ` Alan Stern
2016-05-18 17:06 ` Srinivas Kandagatla
2016-05-18 17:57 ` Srinivas Kandagatla
2016-05-18 18:54 ` Alan Stern
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=573C8B40.1040503@linaro.org \
--to=srinivas.kandagatla@linaro.org \
--cc=andy.gross@linaro.org \
--cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-usb@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=stern@rowland.harvard.edu \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox