From: "Artem S. Tashkinov" <t.artem@lycos.com>
To: hmh@hmh.eng.br
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Re: HT (Hyper Threading) aware process scheduling doesn't work as it should
Date: Mon, 31 Oct 2011 09:40:01 +0000 (GMT) [thread overview]
Message-ID: <574299906.69412.1320054001912.JavaMail.mail@webmail05> (raw)
In-Reply-To: 20111031091607.GB7106@khazad-dum.debian.net
> On Oct 31, 2011, Henrique de Moraes Holschuh wrote:
>
> On Sun, 30 Oct 2011, Artem S. Tashkinov wrote:
> > > Please make sure both are set to 0. If they were not 0 at the time you
> > > ran your tests, please retest and report back.
> >
> > That's 0 & 0 for me.
>
> How idle is your system during the test?
load average: 0.00, 0.00, 0.00
As I've mentioned great many times I run this test on a completely idle system
(i.e. I even `init 3` in advance to avoid any unexpected CPU usage spikes
caused by unrelated processed).
I have to insist that people conduct this test on their own without trusting my
words. Probably there's something I overlook or don't fully understand but from
what I see, there's a serious issue here (at least Microsoft XP and 7 work exactly
the way I believe an OS should handle such a load).
Artem
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2011-10-31 9:40 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 25+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2011-10-30 19:57 HT (Hyper Threading) aware process scheduling doesn't work as it should Artem S. Tashkinov
2011-10-30 21:26 ` Henrique de Moraes Holschuh
2011-10-30 21:51 ` Artem S. Tashkinov
2011-10-31 9:16 ` Henrique de Moraes Holschuh
2011-10-31 9:40 ` Artem S. Tashkinov [this message]
2011-10-31 11:58 ` Henrique de Moraes Holschuh
2011-11-01 4:14 ` Zhu Yanhai
2011-11-01 5:15 ` ffab ffa
2011-10-31 18:59 ` Chris Friesen
2011-11-01 6:01 ` Mike Galbraith
2011-10-30 22:12 ` Arjan van de Ven
2011-10-30 22:29 ` Artem S. Tashkinov
2011-10-31 3:19 ` Yong Zhang
2011-10-31 8:18 ` Artem S. Tashkinov
2011-10-31 10:06 ` Con Kolivas
2011-10-31 11:42 ` Mike Galbraith
2011-11-01 0:41 ` Con Kolivas
2011-11-01 0:58 ` Gene Heskett
2011-11-01 5:08 ` Mike Galbraith
2011-11-03 8:18 ` Ingo Molnar
2011-11-03 9:44 ` Artem S. Tashkinov
2011-11-03 10:29 ` Ingo Molnar
2011-11-03 12:42 ` Henrique de Moraes Holschuh
2011-11-03 13:06 ` Artem S. Tashkinov
2011-11-03 13:00 ` Mike Galbraith
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=574299906.69412.1320054001912.JavaMail.mail@webmail05 \
--to=t.artem@lycos.com \
--cc=hmh@hmh.eng.br \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox