Re: [PATCH] hwrng: stm32 - fix build warning

Arnd Bergmann
2016-05-24T08:59:12Z

On Tuesday, May 24, 2016 10:50:17 AM CEST Maxime Coquelin wrote:
> diff --git a/drivers/char/hw_random/stm32-rng.c
> b/drivers/char/hw_random/stm32-rng.c
> index 92a810648bd0..2a0fc90e4dc3 100644
> --- a/drivers/char/hw_random/stm32-rng.c
> +++ b/drivers/char/hw_random/stm32-rng.c
> @@ -68,6 +68,10 @@ static int stm32_rng_read(struct hwrng *rng, void
> *data, size_t max, bool wait)
> } while (!sr && --timeout);
> }
>
> + if (WARN_ONCE(sr & (RNG_SR_SEIS | RNG_SR_CEIS),
> + "bad RNG status - %x\n", sr))
> + writel_relaxed(0, priv->base + RNG_SR);
> +
> /* If error detected or data not ready... */
> if (sr != RNG_SR_DRDY)
> break;
> @@ -79,10 +83,6 @@ static int stm32_rng_read(struct hwrng *rng, void
> *data, size_t max, bool wait)
> max -= sizeof(u32);
> }
>
> - if (WARN_ONCE(sr & (RNG_SR_SEIS | RNG_SR_CEIS),
> - "bad RNG status - %x\n", sr))
> - writel_relaxed(0, priv->base + RNG_SR);
> -
> pm_runtime_mark_last_busy((struct device *) priv->rng.priv);
> pm_runtime_put_sync_autosuspend((struct device *) priv->rng.priv);
>
> Thanks,
>

Yes, that looks good to me.

Arnd