From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1753307AbcEYLQW (ORCPT ); Wed, 25 May 2016 07:16:22 -0400 Received: from devils.ext.ti.com ([198.47.26.153]:50343 "EHLO devils.ext.ti.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751278AbcEYLQU (ORCPT ); Wed, 25 May 2016 07:16:20 -0400 Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 2/5] ARM: davinci: da8xx: Add CFGCHIP syscon platform declaration. To: David Lechner , Sergei Shtylyov , References: <1462837612-7803-1-git-send-email-david@lechnology.com> <1462837612-7803-3-git-send-email-david@lechnology.com> <7e0373cf-2ae9-e205-2226-0ded6894b709@cogentembedded.com> <57320FE6.60003@lechnology.com> CC: , Rob Herring , Pawel Moll , Mark Rutland , Ian Campbell , Kumar Gala , Kishon Vijay Abraham I , Greg Kroah-Hartman , Alan Stern , Bin Liu , Lee Jones , , , From: Sekhar Nori Message-ID: <5745893C.5040603@ti.com> Date: Wed, 25 May 2016 16:45:08 +0530 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:38.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/38.8.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <57320FE6.60003@lechnology.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="windows-1252" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Tuesday 10 May 2016 10:14 PM, David Lechner wrote: > On 05/10/2016 06:26 AM, Sergei Shtylyov wrote: >> On 5/10/2016 2:46 AM, David Lechner wrote: >> >>> The CFGCHIP registers are used by a number of devices, so using a syscon >>> device to share them. The first consumer of this will by the >>> phy-da8xx-usb >>> driver. >>> >>> Signed-off-by: David Lechner >> [...] >>> diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-davinci/devices-da8xx.c >>> b/arch/arm/mach-davinci/devices-da8xx.c >>> index 725e693..69d11a1 100644 >>> --- a/arch/arm/mach-davinci/devices-da8xx.c >>> +++ b/arch/arm/mach-davinci/devices-da8xx.c >>> @@ -11,6 +11,7 @@ >>> * (at your option) any later version. >>> */ >>> #include >>> +#include >>> #include >>> #include >>> #include >>> @@ -1109,3 +1110,30 @@ int __init da850_register_sata(unsigned long >>> refclkpn) >>> return platform_device_register(&da850_sata_device); >>> } >>> #endif >>> + >>> +static struct syscon_platform_data da8xx_cfgchip_platform_data = { >>> + .label = "cfgchip", >>> +}; >>> + >>> +static struct resource da8xx_cfgchip_resources[] = { >>> + { >>> + .start = DA8XX_SYSCFG0_BASE + DA8XX_CFGCHIP0_REG, >>> + .end = DA8XX_SYSCFG0_BASE + DA8XX_CFGCHIP4_REG + 3, >>> + .flags = IORESOURCE_MEM, >>> + }, >>> +}; >>> + >>> +static struct platform_device da8xx_cfgchip_device = { >>> + .name = "syscon", >>> + .id = 0, >> >> Again, -1. >> >> [...] >> >> MBR, Sergei >> > > I wish you would have noticed this when I first submitted it. I remember > going back and forth about this. But it has been too long and I can't > remember the reason why I chose to go this way. > > It seems like changing it broke something with either this one or the > phy device and I opted to keep it this way on both to be consistent. For > example, the USB devices both use id = 0 as well even though there are > only one of each type. Agree with Sergei here. Can you confirm what broke exactly? I think the USB needs to be fixed too. Thanks, Sekhar