linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: David Long <dave.long@linaro.org>
To: Huang Shijie <shijie.huang@arm.com>
Cc: "Catalin Marinas" <catalin.marinas@arm.com>,
	"Will Deacon" <will.deacon@arm.com>,
	"Sandeepa Prabhu" <sandeepa.s.prabhu@gmail.com>,
	"William Cohen" <wcohen@redhat.com>,
	"Pratyush Anand" <panand@redhat.com>,
	"Steve Capper" <steve.capper@linaro.org>,
	linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	"Marc Zyngier" <marc.zyngier@arm.com>,
	"Mark Rutland" <mark.rutland@arm.com>,
	"Petr Mladek" <pmladek@suse.com>,
	"Viresh Kumar" <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>,
	"John Blackwood" <john.blackwood@ccur.com>,
	"Feng Kan" <fkan@apm.com>, "Zi Shen Lim" <zlim.lnx@gmail.com>,
	"Dave P Martin" <Dave.Martin@arm.com>,
	"Yang Shi" <yang.shi@linaro.org>,
	"Vladimir Murzin" <Vladimir.Murzin@arm.com>,
	"Kees Cook" <keescook@chromium.org>,
	"Suzuki K. Poulose" <suzuki.poulose@arm.com>,
	"Mark Brown" <broonie@kernel.org>,
	"Alex Bennée" <alex.bennee@linaro.org>,
	"Ard Biesheuvel" <ard.biesheuvel@linaro.org>,
	"Greg Kroah-Hartman" <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>,
	"Mark Salyzyn" <salyzyn@android.com>,
	"James Morse" <james.morse@arm.com>,
	"Christoffer Dall" <christoffer.dall@linaro.org>,
	"Andrew Morton" <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
	"Robin Murphy" <Robin.Murphy@arm.com>,
	"Jens Wiklander" <jens.wiklander@linaro.org>,
	"Balamurugan Shanmugam" <bshanmugam@apm.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v12 05/10] arm64: Kprobes with single stepping support
Date: Thu, 26 May 2016 11:40:37 -0400	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <574718F5.2000308@linaro.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20160517085807.GA842@sha-win-210.asiapac.arm.com>

On 05/17/2016 04:58 AM, Huang Shijie wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 27, 2016 at 02:53:00PM -0400, David Long wrote:
>> +
>> +/*
>> + * Interrupts need to be disabled before single-step mode is set, and not
>> + * reenabled until after single-step mode ends.
>> + * Without disabling interrupt on local CPU, there is a chance of
>> + * interrupt occurrence in the period of exception return and  start of
>> + * out-of-line single-step, that result in wrongly single stepping
>> + * into the interrupt handler.
>> + */
>> +static void __kprobes kprobes_save_local_irqflag(struct pt_regs *regs)
>> +{
>> +     struct kprobe_ctlblk *kcb = get_kprobe_ctlblk();
>
> Why not add a parameter for this function to save the @kcb?
>
>> +
>> +     kcb->saved_irqflag = regs->pstate;
>> +     regs->pstate |= PSR_I_BIT;
>> +}
>> +
>> +static void __kprobes kprobes_restore_local_irqflag(struct pt_regs *regs)
>> +{
>> +     struct kprobe_ctlblk *kcb = get_kprobe_ctlblk();
> ditto.
>
>> +
>> +     if (kcb->saved_irqflag & PSR_I_BIT)
>> +             regs->pstate |= PSR_I_BIT;
>> +     else
>> +             regs->pstate &= ~PSR_I_BIT;
>> +}
>> +
>> +static void __kprobes
>> +set_ss_context(struct kprobe_ctlblk *kcb, unsigned long addr)
>> +{
>> +     kcb->ss_ctx.ss_pending = true;
>> +     kcb->ss_ctx.match_addr = addr + sizeof(kprobe_opcode_t);
>> +}
>> +
>> +static void __kprobes clear_ss_context(struct kprobe_ctlblk *kcb)
>> +{
>> +     kcb->ss_ctx.ss_pending = false;
>> +     kcb->ss_ctx.match_addr = 0;
>> +}
>> +
>> +static void __kprobes setup_singlestep(struct kprobe *p,
>> +                                    struct pt_regs *regs,
>> +                                    struct kprobe_ctlblk *kcb, int reenter)
>> +{
>> +     unsigned long slot;
>> +
>> +     if (reenter) {
>> +             save_previous_kprobe(kcb);
>> +             set_current_kprobe(p);
>> +             kcb->kprobe_status = KPROBE_REENTER;
>> +     } else {
>> +             kcb->kprobe_status = KPROBE_HIT_SS;
>> +     }
>> +
>> +     if (p->ainsn.insn) {
>> +             /* prepare for single stepping */
>> +             slot = (unsigned long)p->ainsn.insn;
>> +
>> +             set_ss_context(kcb, slot);      /* mark pending ss */
>> +
>> +             if (kcb->kprobe_status == KPROBE_REENTER)
>> +                     spsr_set_debug_flag(regs, 0);
>> +
>> +             /* IRQs and single stepping do not mix well. */
>> +             kprobes_save_local_irqflag(regs);
>> +             kernel_enable_single_step(regs);
>> +             instruction_pointer(regs) = slot;
>> +     } else  {
>> +             BUG();
>> +     }
>> +}
>> +
>> +static int __kprobes reenter_kprobe(struct kprobe *p,
>> +                                 struct pt_regs *regs,
>> +                                 struct kprobe_ctlblk *kcb)
>> +{
>> +     switch (kcb->kprobe_status) {
>> +     case KPROBE_HIT_SSDONE:
>> +     case KPROBE_HIT_ACTIVE:
>> +             kprobes_inc_nmissed_count(p);
>> +             setup_singlestep(p, regs, kcb, 1);
>> +             break;
>> +     case KPROBE_HIT_SS:
>> +     case KPROBE_REENTER:
>> +             pr_warn("Unrecoverable kprobe detected at %p.\n", p->addr);
>> +             dump_kprobe(p);
>> +             BUG();
>> +             break;
>> +     default:
>> +             WARN_ON(1);
>> +             return 0;
>> +     }
>> +
>> +     return 1;
>> +}
>> +
>> +static void __kprobes
>> +post_kprobe_handler(struct kprobe_ctlblk *kcb, struct pt_regs *regs)
>> +{
>> +     struct kprobe *cur = kprobe_running();
>> +
>> +     if (!cur)
>> +             return;
>> +
>> +     /* return addr restore if non-branching insn */
>> +     if (cur->ainsn.restore.type == RESTORE_PC) {
>> +             instruction_pointer(regs) = cur->ainsn.restore.addr;
>> +             if (!instruction_pointer(regs))
>> +                     BUG();
>> +     }
>> +
>> +     /* restore back original saved kprobe variables and continue */
>> +     if (kcb->kprobe_status == KPROBE_REENTER) {
>> +             restore_previous_kprobe(kcb);
>> +             return;
>> +     }
>> +     /* call post handler */
>> +     kcb->kprobe_status = KPROBE_HIT_SSDONE;
>> +     if (cur->post_handler)  {
>> +             /* post_handler can hit breakpoint and single step
>> +              * again, so we enable D-flag for recursive exception.
>> +              */
>> +             cur->post_handler(cur, regs, 0);
>> +     }
>> +
>> +     reset_current_kprobe();
>> +}
>> +
>> +int __kprobes kprobe_fault_handler(struct pt_regs *regs, unsigned int fsr)
>> +{
>> +     struct kprobe *cur = kprobe_running();
>> +     struct kprobe_ctlblk *kcb = get_kprobe_ctlblk();
>> +
>> +     switch (kcb->kprobe_status) {
>> +     case KPROBE_HIT_SS:
>> +     case KPROBE_REENTER:
>> +             /*
>> +              * We are here because the instruction being single
>> +              * stepped caused a page fault. We reset the current
>> +              * kprobe and the ip points back to the probe address
>> +              * and allow the page fault handler to continue as a
>> +              * normal page fault.
>> +              */
>> +             instruction_pointer(regs) = (unsigned long)cur->addr;
>> +             if (!instruction_pointer(regs))
>> +                     BUG();
>> +             if (kcb->kprobe_status == KPROBE_REENTER)
>> +                     restore_previous_kprobe(kcb);
>> +             else
>> +                     reset_current_kprobe();
>> +
>> +             break;
>> +     case KPROBE_HIT_ACTIVE:
>> +     case KPROBE_HIT_SSDONE:
>> +             /*
>> +              * We increment the nmissed count for accounting,
>> +              * we can also use npre/npostfault count for accounting
>> +              * these specific fault cases.
>> +              */
>> +             kprobes_inc_nmissed_count(cur);
>> +
>> +             /*
>> +              * We come here because instructions in the pre/post
>> +              * handler caused the page_fault, this could happen
>> +              * if handler tries to access user space by
>> +              * copy_from_user(), get_user() etc. Let the
>> +              * user-specified handler try to fix it first.
>> +              */
>> +             if (cur->fault_handler && cur->fault_handler(cur, regs, fsr))
>> +                     return 1;
>> +
>> +             /*
>> +              * In case the user-specified fault handler returned
>> +              * zero, try to fix up.
>> +              */
>> +             if (fixup_exception(regs))
>> +                     return 1;
>> +     }
>> +     return 0;
>> +}
>> +
>> +int __kprobes kprobe_exceptions_notify(struct notifier_block *self,
>> +                                    unsigned long val, void *data)
>> +{
>> +     return NOTIFY_DONE;
>> +}
>> +
>> +static void __kprobes kprobe_handler(struct pt_regs *regs)
>> +{
>> +     struct kprobe *p, *cur_kprobe;
>> +     struct kprobe_ctlblk *kcb;
>> +     unsigned long addr = instruction_pointer(regs);
>> +
>> +     kcb = get_kprobe_ctlblk();
>> +     cur_kprobe = kprobe_running();
>> +
>> +     p = get_kprobe((kprobe_opcode_t *) addr);
>> +
>> +     if (p) {
>> +             if (cur_kprobe) {
>> +                     if (reenter_kprobe(p, regs, kcb))
>> +                             return;
>> +             } else {
>> +                     /* Probe hit */
>> +                     set_current_kprobe(p);
>> +                     kcb->kprobe_status = KPROBE_HIT_ACTIVE;
>> +
>> +                     /*
>> +                      * If we have no pre-handler or it returned 0, we
>> +                      * continue with normal processing.  If we have a
>> +                      * pre-handler and it returned non-zero, it prepped
>> +                      * for calling the break_handler below on re-entry,
>> +                      * so get out doing nothing more here.
>> +                      *
>> +                      * pre_handler can hit a breakpoint and can step thru
>> +                      * before return, keep PSTATE D-flag enabled until
>> +                      * pre_handler return back.
>> +                      */
>> +                     if (!p->pre_handler || !p->pre_handler(p, regs)) {
>> +                             kcb->kprobe_status = KPROBE_HIT_SS;
> The above line is duplicated.
> You will set KPROBE_HIT_SS in the setup_singlestep.
>
>> +                             setup_singlestep(p, regs, kcb, 0);
>> +                             return;
>> +                     }
>> +             }
>> +     } else if ((le32_to_cpu(*(kprobe_opcode_t *) addr) ==
>> +         BRK64_OPCODE_KPROBES) && cur_kprobe) {
>> +             /* We probably hit a jprobe.  Call its break handler. */
>> +             if (cur_kprobe->break_handler  &&
>> +                  cur_kprobe->break_handler(cur_kprobe, regs)) {
>> +                     kcb->kprobe_status = KPROBE_HIT_SS;
> ditto
>> +                     setup_singlestep(cur_kprobe, regs, kcb, 0);
>> +                     return;
>> +             }
>> +     }
>> +     /*
>> +      * The breakpoint instruction was removed right
>> +      * after we hit it.  Another cpu has removed
>> +      * either a probepoint or a debugger breakpoint
>> +      * at this address.  In either case, no further
>> +      * handling of this interrupt is appropriate.
>> +      * Return back to original instruction, and continue.
>> +      */
>> +}
> thanks
> Huang Shijie
> IMPORTANT NOTICE: The contents of this email and any attachments are confidential and may also be privileged. If you are not the intended recipient, please notify the sender immediately and do not disclose the contents to any other person, use it for any purpose, or store or copy the information in any medium. Thank you.
>


I've made the above changes for the next version of this patch.

Thanks,
-dl

  parent reply	other threads:[~2016-05-26 15:40 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 36+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2016-04-27 18:52 [PATCH v12 00/10] arm64: Add kernel probes (kprobes) support David Long
2016-04-27 18:52 ` [PATCH v12 01/10] arm64: Add HAVE_REGS_AND_STACK_ACCESS_API feature David Long
2016-04-28 16:08   ` Marc Zyngier
2016-05-13 19:07     ` David Long
2016-05-17  9:14   ` Huang Shijie
2016-05-20  4:18     ` David Long
2016-04-27 18:52 ` [PATCH v12 02/10] arm64: Add more test functions to insn.c David Long
2016-04-27 18:52 ` [PATCH v12 03/10] arm64: add conditional instruction simulation support David Long
2016-04-27 18:52 ` [PATCH v12 04/10] arm64: Blacklist non-kprobe-able symbols David Long
2016-04-27 18:53 ` [PATCH v12 05/10] arm64: Kprobes with single stepping support David Long
2016-05-12 15:01   ` James Morse
2016-05-18  4:04     ` Masami Hiramatsu
2016-05-20  5:16     ` David Long
2016-05-17  8:58   ` Huang Shijie
2016-05-18  3:29     ` Masami Hiramatsu
2016-05-26 19:25       ` David Long
2016-05-26 15:40     ` David Long [this message]
2016-05-17  9:10   ` Huang Shijie
2016-06-01  5:15     ` David Long
2016-04-27 18:53 ` [PATCH v12 06/10] arm64: Treat all entry code as non-kprobe-able David Long
2016-05-12 14:49   ` James Morse
2016-05-20  5:28     ` David Long
2016-05-26 15:26     ` David Long
2016-04-27 18:53 ` [PATCH v12 07/10] arm64: kprobes instruction simulation support David Long
2016-05-19  1:52   ` Huang Shijie
2016-05-26 19:28     ` David Long
2016-04-27 18:53 ` [PATCH v12 08/10] arm64: Add trampoline code for kretprobes David Long
2016-04-27 18:53 ` [PATCH v12 09/10] arm64: Add kernel return probes support (kretprobes) David Long
2016-04-27 18:53 ` [PATCH v12 10/10] kprobes: Add arm64 case in kprobe example module David Long
2016-05-17  9:57   ` Huang Shijie
2016-05-17 10:24     ` Mark Brown
2016-05-18  1:31       ` Huang Shijie
2016-05-11 15:33 ` [PATCH v12 00/10] arm64: Add kernel probes (kprobes) support James Morse
2016-05-12  2:26   ` Li Bin
2016-05-13 20:02     ` David Long
2016-05-18  2:24     ` Huang Shijie

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=574718F5.2000308@linaro.org \
    --to=dave.long@linaro.org \
    --cc=Dave.Martin@arm.com \
    --cc=Robin.Murphy@arm.com \
    --cc=Vladimir.Murzin@arm.com \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=alex.bennee@linaro.org \
    --cc=ard.biesheuvel@linaro.org \
    --cc=broonie@kernel.org \
    --cc=bshanmugam@apm.com \
    --cc=catalin.marinas@arm.com \
    --cc=christoffer.dall@linaro.org \
    --cc=fkan@apm.com \
    --cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
    --cc=james.morse@arm.com \
    --cc=jens.wiklander@linaro.org \
    --cc=john.blackwood@ccur.com \
    --cc=keescook@chromium.org \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=marc.zyngier@arm.com \
    --cc=mark.rutland@arm.com \
    --cc=panand@redhat.com \
    --cc=pmladek@suse.com \
    --cc=salyzyn@android.com \
    --cc=sandeepa.s.prabhu@gmail.com \
    --cc=shijie.huang@arm.com \
    --cc=steve.capper@linaro.org \
    --cc=suzuki.poulose@arm.com \
    --cc=viresh.kumar@linaro.org \
    --cc=wcohen@redhat.com \
    --cc=will.deacon@arm.com \
    --cc=yang.shi@linaro.org \
    --cc=zlim.lnx@gmail.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).