From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S932639AbYDQRzK (ORCPT ); Thu, 17 Apr 2008 13:55:10 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1760821AbYDQRyy (ORCPT ); Thu, 17 Apr 2008 13:54:54 -0400 Received: from web50210.mail.re2.yahoo.com ([206.190.38.51]:28684 "HELO web50210.mail.re2.yahoo.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with SMTP id S1760400AbYDQRyx (ORCPT ); Thu, 17 Apr 2008 13:54:53 -0400 DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=s1024; d=yahoo.com; h=X-YMail-OSG:Received:X-Mailer:Date:From:Reply-To:Subject:To:Cc:In-Reply-To:MIME-Version:Content-Type:Message-ID; b=UribFx2RsTELKqQRsRkwJVe5jN6PwiatzdvoP6rhTyKj2GvnKlvuII1VId2YoTHBeaIT+0DyBDTWq9OsrfUkIK2/KSBfdC6W4FUN8OHEr6gJS7plFxnb+BP7w/EOwSUyUmaHeA+NRk5zRrbCvH9NzYEhRBBUcA6yybHh4U9FhUs=; X-YMail-OSG: 3HTsNroVM1m7OV4EpzRzftKBekzjRE0SYO19SU8UVidUuNXcW6xFNkNIHtvMkdTRRY0u_x0zcQKy.YF_7De_c3jow.eeKLw- X-Mailer: YahooMailWebService/0.7.185 Date: Thu, 17 Apr 2008 10:54:52 -0700 (PDT) From: Alex Davis Reply-To: alex14641@yahoo.com Subject: Re: [patch 00/66] 2.6.24-stable review To: Adrian Bunk Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, chrisw@sous-sol.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org In-Reply-To: <20080417173313.GA1962@cs181133002.pp.htv.fi> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Message-ID: <574974.75592.qm@web50210.mail.re2.yahoo.com> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org I code, therefore I am --- On Thu, 4/17/08, Adrian Bunk wrote: > From: Adrian Bunk > Subject: Re: [patch 00/66] 2.6.24-stable review > To: "Alex Davis" > Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, chrisw@sous-sol.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org > Date: Thursday, April 17, 2008, 1:33 PM > On Thu, Apr 17, 2008 at 08:05:56AM -0700, Alex Davis wrote: > > Apologies to anyone who receives this message twice. > > > > Is the patch referenced in > http://lkml.org/lkml/2008/4/10/409 necessary > > for stable? > > It's a 2.6.25-rc regression fixed in 2.6.25. > > cu > Adrian Thanks. I just looked at the 2.6.24.4 version of the same file and, seeing that the section of code the patch applied to was the same,(erroneously) assumed the patch might be needed. > -- > > "Is there not promise of rain?" Ling Tan > asked suddenly out > of the darkness. There had been need of rain for > many days. > "Only a promise," Lao Er said. > Pearl S. Buck - > Dragon Seed ____________________________________________________________________________________ Be a better friend, newshound, and know-it-all with Yahoo! Mobile. Try it now. http://mobile.yahoo.com/;_ylt=Ahu06i62sR8HDtDypao8Wcj9tAcJ