Re: [patch 00/66] 2.6.24-stable review

Alex Davis
2008-04-17T17:55:10Z

I code, therefore I am

--- On Thu, 4/17/08, Adrian Bunk <bunk@kernel.org> wrote:

> From: Adrian Bunk <bunk@kernel.org>
> Subject: Re: [patch 00/66] 2.6.24-stable review
> To: "Alex Davis" <alex14641@yahoo.com>
> Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, chrisw@sous-sol.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org
> Date: Thursday, April 17, 2008, 1:33 PM
> On Thu, Apr 17, 2008 at 08:05:56AM -0700, Alex Davis wrote:
> > Apologies to anyone who receives this message twice.
> >
> > Is the patch referenced in
> http://lkml.org/lkml/2008/4/10/409 necessary
> > for stable?
>
> It's a 2.6.25-rc regression fixed in 2.6.25.
>
> cu
> Adrian
Thanks. I just looked at the 2.6.24.4 version of the same file and,
seeing that the section of code the patch applied to was the same,(erroneously) assumed the patch might be needed.

> --
>
> "Is there not promise of rain?" Ling Tan
> asked suddenly out
> of the darkness. There had been need of rain for
> many days.
> "Only a promise," Lao Er said.
> Pearl S. Buck -
> Dragon Seed

____________________________________________________________________________________
Be a better friend, newshound, and
know-it-all with Yahoo! Mobile. Try it now. http://mobile.yahoo.com/;_ylt=Ahu06i62sR8HDtDypao8Wcj9tAcJ