[PATCH v2 2/2] mmc: dw_mmc: check card present before starting request

[PATCH v2 2/2] mmc: dw_mmc: check card present before starting request

[Shawn Lin]

The main reason to add this check is to avoid unnecessary
mmc_request like the on-going cmd and the corresponding sbc
if the card is removed. Although we have already checked this in
dw_mci_handle_cd for runtime usage of sd card and dw_mci_init_slot
for noremovable devices, but there is a timing gap before it really
calls dw_mci_get_cd as mmc_detect_change needs some delay here.

Another gain here is that we could save some checkings of card status
after sd card been removed.

Signed-off-by: Shawn Lin <shawn.lin@rock-chips.com>

---

Changes in v2:
- hold lock before dw_mci_queue_request

 drivers/mmc/host/dw_mmc.c | 7 ++++---
 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/mmc/host/dw_mmc.c b/drivers/mmc/host/dw_mmc.c
index cb30e91..2b4b3df 100644
--- a/drivers/mmc/host/dw_mmc.c
+++ b/drivers/mmc/host/dw_mmc.c
@@ -105,6 +105,7 @@ struct idmac_desc {
 static bool dw_mci_reset(struct dw_mci *host);
 static bool dw_mci_ctrl_reset(struct dw_mci *host, u32 reset);
 static int dw_mci_card_busy(struct mmc_host *mmc);
+static int dw_mci_get_cd(struct mmc_host *mmc);
 
 #if defined(CONFIG_DEBUG_FS)
 static int dw_mci_req_show(struct seq_file *s, void *v)
@@ -1253,15 +1254,15 @@ static void dw_mci_request(struct mmc_host *mmc, struct mmc_request *mrq)
 	 * atomic, otherwise the card could be removed in between and the
 	 * request wouldn't fail until another card was inserted.
 	 */
-	spin_lock_bh(&host->lock);
 
-	if (!test_bit(DW_MMC_CARD_PRESENT, &slot->flags)) {
-		spin_unlock_bh(&host->lock);
+	if (!dw_mci_get_cd(mmc)) {
 		mrq->cmd->error = -ENOMEDIUM;
 		mmc_request_done(mmc, mrq);
 		return;
 	}
 
+	spin_lock_bh(&host->lock);
+
 	dw_mci_queue_request(host, slot, mrq);
 
 	spin_unlock_bh(&host->lock);
-- 
2.3.7

Re: [PATCH v2 2/2] mmc: dw_mmc: check card present before starting request

[Jaehoon Chung]

Hi Shawn,

On 05/27/2016 03:37 PM, Shawn Lin wrote:
> The main reason to add this check is to avoid unnecessary
> mmc_request like the on-going cmd and the corresponding sbc
> if the card is removed. Although we have already checked this in
> dw_mci_handle_cd for runtime usage of sd card and dw_mci_init_slot
> for noremovable devices, but there is a timing gap before it really
> calls dw_mci_get_cd as mmc_detect_change needs some delay here.
> 
> Another gain here is that we could save some checkings of card status
> after sd card been removed.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Shawn Lin <shawn.lin@rock-chips.com>

Applied on my repository.
Thanks!

Best Regards,
Jaehoon Chung

> 
> ---
> 
> Changes in v2:
> - hold lock before dw_mci_queue_request
> 
>  drivers/mmc/host/dw_mmc.c | 7 ++++---
>  1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/mmc/host/dw_mmc.c b/drivers/mmc/host/dw_mmc.c
> index cb30e91..2b4b3df 100644
> --- a/drivers/mmc/host/dw_mmc.c
> +++ b/drivers/mmc/host/dw_mmc.c
> @@ -105,6 +105,7 @@ struct idmac_desc {
>  static bool dw_mci_reset(struct dw_mci *host);
>  static bool dw_mci_ctrl_reset(struct dw_mci *host, u32 reset);
>  static int dw_mci_card_busy(struct mmc_host *mmc);
> +static int dw_mci_get_cd(struct mmc_host *mmc);
>  
>  #if defined(CONFIG_DEBUG_FS)
>  static int dw_mci_req_show(struct seq_file *s, void *v)
> @@ -1253,15 +1254,15 @@ static void dw_mci_request(struct mmc_host *mmc, struct mmc_request *mrq)
>  	 * atomic, otherwise the card could be removed in between and the
>  	 * request wouldn't fail until another card was inserted.
>  	 */
> -	spin_lock_bh(&host->lock);
>  
> -	if (!test_bit(DW_MMC_CARD_PRESENT, &slot->flags)) {
> -		spin_unlock_bh(&host->lock);
> +	if (!dw_mci_get_cd(mmc)) {
>  		mrq->cmd->error = -ENOMEDIUM;
>  		mmc_request_done(mmc, mrq);
>  		return;
>  	}
>  
> +	spin_lock_bh(&host->lock);
> +
>  	dw_mci_queue_request(host, slot, mrq);
>  
>  	spin_unlock_bh(&host->lock);
>