From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org>
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand
	id S932706AbcE3JNY (ORCPT <rfc822;w@1wt.eu>);
	Mon, 30 May 2016 05:13:24 -0400
Received: from szxga02-in.huawei.com ([119.145.14.65]:63334 "EHLO
	szxga02-in.huawei.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org
	with ESMTP id S932065AbcE3JNW (ORCPT
	<rfc822;linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>);
	Mon, 30 May 2016 05:13:22 -0400
Subject: Re: [PATCH v6 10/11] perf callchain: Support x86 target platform
To: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@redhat.com>
References: <1464436800-39860-1-git-send-email-hekuang@huawei.com>
 <1464436800-39860-11-git-send-email-hekuang@huawei.com>
 <20160530085317.GF25607@krava>
CC: <peterz@infradead.org>, <mingo@redhat.com>, <acme@kernel.org>,
        <alexander.shishkin@linux.intel.com>, <wangnan0@huawei.com>,
        <jpoimboe@redhat.com>, <ak@linux.intel.com>, <eranian@google.com>,
        <namhyung@kernel.org>, <adrian.hunter@intel.com>,
        <sukadev@linux.vnet.ibm.com>, <masami.hiramatsu.pt@hitachi.com>,
        <tumanova@linux.vnet.ibm.com>, <kan.liang@intel.com>,
        <penberg@kernel.org>, <dsahern@gmail.com>,
        <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
From: Hekuang <hekuang@huawei.com>
Message-ID: <574C03C7.9030807@huawei.com>
Date: Mon, 30 May 2016 17:11:35 +0800
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:38.0) Gecko/20100101
 Thunderbird/38.6.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <20160530085317.GF25607@krava>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
X-Originating-IP: [10.110.55.166]
X-CFilter-Loop: Reflected
X-Mirapoint-Virus-RAPID-Raw: score=unknown(0),
	refid=str=0001.0A090201.574C03D3.0041,ss=1,re=0.000,recu=0.000,reip=0.000,cl=1,cld=1,fgs=0,
	ip=0.0.0.0,
	so=2013-06-18 04:22:30,
	dmn=2013-03-21 17:37:32
X-Mirapoint-Loop-Id: 5df3781a9436c28b3c58c07734b4b0c6
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
List-ID: <linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org>
X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org

hi

在 2016/5/30 16:53, Jiri Olsa 写道:
> On Sat, May 28, 2016 at 11:59:59AM +0000, He Kuang wrote:
>> Support x86(32-bit) cross platform callchain unwind.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: He Kuang <hekuang@huawei.com>
>> ---
>>   tools/perf/arch/Build                              |  1 +
>>   tools/perf/arch/x86/util/unwind-libunwind.c        |  7 ++++---
>>   tools/perf/arch/x86/util/unwind-libunwind_x86_32.c | 21 +++++++++++++++++++++
>>   tools/perf/util/unwind-libunwind-local.c           |  4 ++++
>>   tools/perf/util/unwind-libunwind.c                 | 19 +++++++++++++------
>>   tools/perf/util/unwind.h                           | 10 ++++++++++
>>   6 files changed, 53 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)
>>   create mode 100644 tools/perf/arch/x86/util/unwind-libunwind_x86_32.c
>>
>> diff --git a/tools/perf/arch/Build b/tools/perf/arch/Build
>> index 109eb75..3fc4af1 100644
>> --- a/tools/perf/arch/Build
>> +++ b/tools/perf/arch/Build
>> @@ -1,2 +1,3 @@
>>   libperf-y += common.o
>>   libperf-y += $(ARCH)/
>> +libperf-$(CONFIG_LIBUNWIND_X86)      += x86/util/unwind-libunwind_x86_32.o
> we have Build file directly in arch/x86/util/
>
> if you do it like this to include generic file easily
> we better fix the include then

This is because "libperf-y += $(ARCH)" will only sink into $(ARCH) folder,
for example on x86_64, only tools/perf/arch/x86 will be built. But for
  remote libunwind, we also need
  'tools/perf/arch/arm64/util/unwind-libunwind.o', while arm64 folder is
not added to libperf-y. Is there a gracefull to deal with this?

> jirka
>