From: Hanjun Guo <hanjun.guo@linaro.org>
To: David Daney <ddaney.cavm@gmail.com>,
Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com>,
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>,
Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>,
Tony Luck <tony.luck@intel.com>,
Fenghua Yu <fenghua.yu@intel.com>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>, "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>,
x86@kernel.org, "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@rjwysocki.net>,
Len Brown <lenb@kernel.org>, Rob Herring <robh+dt@kernel.org>,
Frank Rowand <frowand.list@gmail.com>,
Grant Likely <grant.likely@linaro.org>,
Robert Moore <robert.moore@intel.com>,
Lv Zheng <lv.zheng@intel.com>,
Marc Zyngier <Marc.Zyngier@arm.com>,
linux-ia64@vger.kernel.org, linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org,
devel@acpica.org
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Robert Richter <rrichter@cavium.com>,
David Daney <david.daney@cavium.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v7 13/15] ACPI / processor: Add acpi_map_madt_entry().
Date: Tue, 31 May 2016 21:05:13 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <574D8C09.3030608@linaro.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1464129345-18985-14-git-send-email-ddaney.cavm@gmail.com>
On 2016/5/25 6:35, David Daney wrote:
> From: David Daney <david.daney@cavium.com>
>
> Follow-on arm64 ACPI/NUMA patches need to map MADT entries very early
> (before kmalloc is usable).
>
> Add acpi_map_madt_entry() which, indirectly, uses
> early_memremap()/early_memunmap() to access the table and parse out
> the mpidr. The existing implementation of map_madt_entry() is
> modified to take a pointer to the MADT as a parameter and the callers
> adjusted.
>
> Signed-off-by: David Daney <david.daney@cavium.com>
> ---
> drivers/acpi/processor_core.c | 26 ++++++++++++++++++++++----
> include/acpi/processor.h | 1 +
> 2 files changed, 23 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/acpi/processor_core.c b/drivers/acpi/processor_core.c
> index 33a38d6..9125d7d 100644
> --- a/drivers/acpi/processor_core.c
> +++ b/drivers/acpi/processor_core.c
> @@ -108,13 +108,12 @@ static int map_gicc_mpidr(struct acpi_subtable_header *entry,
> return -EINVAL;
> }
>
> -static phys_cpuid_t map_madt_entry(int type, u32 acpi_id)
> +static phys_cpuid_t map_madt_entry(struct acpi_table_madt *madt,
> + int type, u32 acpi_id)
> {
> unsigned long madt_end, entry;
> phys_cpuid_t phys_id = PHYS_CPUID_INVALID; /* CPU hardware ID */
> - struct acpi_table_madt *madt;
>
> - madt = get_madt_table();
> if (!madt)
> return phys_id;
>
> @@ -145,6 +144,25 @@ static phys_cpuid_t map_madt_entry(int type, u32 acpi_id)
> return phys_id;
> }
>
> +phys_cpuid_t __init acpi_map_madt_entry(u32 acpi_id)
> +{
> + struct acpi_table_madt *madt = NULL;
> + acpi_size tbl_size;
> + phys_cpuid_t rv;
> +
> + acpi_get_table_with_size(ACPI_SIG_MADT, 0,
> + (struct acpi_table_header **)&madt,
> + &tbl_size);
> + if (!madt)
> + return PHYS_CPUID_INVALID;
> +
> + rv = map_madt_entry(madt, 1, acpi_id);
Just nit-pick, pass 1 here means we need to define an acpi processor
device object in DSDT (see function map_gicc_mpidr(),
device_declaration), it would be fine for x2apic and gic mode,
but not for lapic mode, since the function name is acpi_map_madt_entry
which is general for all architecture, it will confuse people I think.
How about rename acpi_map_madt_entry() to acpi_map_madt_gicc_entry()?
It's only used for AMR64 to get mpidrs from GICC entries using acpi_id,
other than that, it's good to me.
Thanks
Hanjun
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2016-05-31 13:05 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 31+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2016-05-24 22:35 [PATCH v7 00/15] ACPI NUMA support for ARM64 David Daney
2016-05-24 22:35 ` [PATCH v7 01/15] acpi, numa: Use pr_fmt() instead of printk David Daney
2016-05-24 22:35 ` [PATCH v7 02/15] acpi, numa: Replace ACPI_DEBUG_PRINT() with pr_debug() David Daney
2016-05-24 22:35 ` [PATCH v7 03/15] acpi, numa: remove duplicate NULL check David Daney
2016-05-24 22:35 ` [PATCH v7 04/15] acpi, numa: Move acpi_numa_arch_fixup() to ia64 only David Daney
2016-05-24 22:35 ` [PATCH v7 05/15] acpi, numa: move acpi_numa_slit_init() to drivers/acpi/numa.c David Daney
2016-05-24 22:35 ` [PATCH v7 06/15] arm64, numa: rework numa_add_memblk() David Daney
2016-05-24 22:35 ` [PATCH v7 07/15] arm64, numa: Cleanup NUMA disabled messages David Daney
2016-05-27 7:58 ` Dennis Chen
2016-05-31 12:28 ` Hanjun Guo
2016-05-24 22:35 ` [PATCH v7 08/15] x86, acpi, numa: cleanup acpi_numa_processor_affinity_init() David Daney
2016-05-24 22:35 ` [PATCH v7 09/15] acpi, numa: move bad_srat() and srat_disabled() to drivers/acpi/numa.c David Daney
2016-05-24 22:35 ` [PATCH v7 10/15] acpi, numa: remove unneeded acpi_numa=1 David Daney
2016-05-24 22:35 ` [PATCH v7 11/15] acpi, numa: Move acpi_numa_memory_affinity_init() to drivers/acpi/numa.c David Daney
2016-05-24 22:35 ` [PATCH v7 12/15] acpi, numa, srat: Improve SRAT error detection and add messages David Daney
2016-05-24 22:35 ` [PATCH v7 13/15] ACPI / processor: Add acpi_map_madt_entry() David Daney
2016-05-25 14:42 ` Catalin Marinas
2016-05-31 13:05 ` Hanjun Guo [this message]
2016-05-24 22:35 ` [PATCH v7 14/15] arm64, acpi, numa: NUMA support based on SRAT and SLIT David Daney
2016-05-25 14:42 ` Catalin Marinas
2016-05-27 8:04 ` Dennis Chen
2016-08-15 15:35 ` Catalin Marinas
2016-08-15 22:55 ` David Daney
2016-08-16 11:58 ` Hanjun Guo
2016-05-24 22:35 ` [PATCH v7 15/15] acpi, numa: Enable ACPI based NUMA on ARM64 David Daney
2016-06-09 19:47 ` Matthias Brugger
2016-06-17 2:04 ` Hanjun Guo
2016-06-03 22:07 ` [PATCH v7 00/15] ACPI NUMA support for ARM64 Rafael J. Wysocki
2016-06-10 10:20 ` Robert Richter
2016-06-10 10:26 ` Robert Richter
2016-06-10 13:51 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=574D8C09.3030608@linaro.org \
--to=hanjun.guo@linaro.org \
--cc=Marc.Zyngier@arm.com \
--cc=catalin.marinas@arm.com \
--cc=david.daney@cavium.com \
--cc=ddaney.cavm@gmail.com \
--cc=devel@acpica.org \
--cc=fenghua.yu@intel.com \
--cc=frowand.list@gmail.com \
--cc=grant.likely@linaro.org \
--cc=hpa@zytor.com \
--cc=lenb@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-ia64@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=lv.zheng@intel.com \
--cc=mark.rutland@arm.com \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=rjw@rjwysocki.net \
--cc=robert.moore@intel.com \
--cc=robh+dt@kernel.org \
--cc=rrichter@cavium.com \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=tony.luck@intel.com \
--cc=will.deacon@arm.com \
--cc=x86@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox