From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1754596AbcEaOxX (ORCPT ); Tue, 31 May 2016 10:53:23 -0400 Received: from bh-25.webhostbox.net ([208.91.199.152]:53272 "EHLO bh-25.webhostbox.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753686AbcEaOxW (ORCPT ); Tue, 31 May 2016 10:53:22 -0400 Subject: Re: pxa_defconfig runtime failures due to 'ARM: pxa: activate pinctrl for device-tree machines' To: Robert Jarzmik References: <20160527202715.GA4841@roeck-us.net> <87a8jah9ok.fsf@belgarion.home> <574A0AD1.9000304@roeck-us.net> <87vb1ueo8s.fsf@belgarion.home> Cc: Linus Walleij , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org From: Guenter Roeck Message-ID: <574DA55E.7070109@roeck-us.net> Date: Tue, 31 May 2016 07:53:18 -0700 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:38.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/38.7.2 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <87vb1ueo8s.fsf@belgarion.home> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Authenticated_sender: linux@roeck-us.net X-OutGoing-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.0 X-AntiAbuse: This header was added to track abuse, please include it with any abuse report X-AntiAbuse: Primary Hostname - bh-25.webhostbox.net X-AntiAbuse: Original Domain - vger.kernel.org X-AntiAbuse: Originator/Caller UID/GID - [47 12] / [47 12] X-AntiAbuse: Sender Address Domain - roeck-us.net X-Get-Message-Sender-Via: bh-25.webhostbox.net: authenticated_id: linux@roeck-us.net X-Authenticated-Sender: bh-25.webhostbox.net: linux@roeck-us.net X-Source: X-Source-Args: X-Source-Dir: Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On 05/30/2016 11:27 PM, Robert Jarzmik wrote: > Guenter Roeck writes: > >> On 05/28/2016 01:24 AM, Robert Jarzmik wrote: >>> Guenter Roeck writes: >>> >>>> Hi, >>> I'd rather say that pxa_defconfig doesn't work anymore on any legacy system. >>> Its first purpose was to ensure compilation coverage of all legacy pxa systems. >>> Its second one was to have a single kernel bootable on all legacy pxa systems. >>> >>> Therefore, would you tell me if the patch in [1] fixes your issue ? >>> >> >> Yes, it does. It is actually the workaround I deployed for my test builds, >> since I thought that the change was on purpose. > > Good. Can I take that as a Tested-by ? > Yes. Guenter