From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1755050AbcEaQH5 (ORCPT ); Tue, 31 May 2016 12:07:57 -0400 Received: from mail-it0-f41.google.com ([209.85.214.41]:38568 "EHLO mail-it0-f41.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1754965AbcEaQHx (ORCPT ); Tue, 31 May 2016 12:07:53 -0400 Subject: Re: [PATCH v6 8/8] block: mark BIO_MAX_SIZE as obsolete To: Ming Lei , Jens Axboe , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org References: <1464615294-9946-1-git-send-email-ming.lei@canonical.com> <1464615294-9946-9-git-send-email-ming.lei@canonical.com> Cc: linux-block@vger.kernel.org, Christoph Hellwig , Keith Busch , "Kirill A. Shutemov" , Kent Overstreet , Mike Snitzer From: Jens Axboe Message-ID: <574DB6D6.20103@kernel.dk> Date: Tue, 31 May 2016 10:07:50 -0600 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:38.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/38.8.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <1464615294-9946-9-git-send-email-ming.lei@canonical.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On 05/30/2016 07:34 AM, Ming Lei wrote: > Some in-tree drivers may use big bio which size is more > than BIO_MAX_SIZE, also the macro is seldom used in tree. > > So mark it as obsolete now, and it doesn't make sense > after multipage bvec is introduced. Is it used in the tree after the patchset? If not, kill it, there's no such thing as a deprecated/obsolete define. -- Jens Axboe