From: Hekuang <hekuang@huawei.com>
To: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@redhat.com>
Cc: <peterz@infradead.org>, <mingo@redhat.com>, <acme@kernel.org>,
<alexander.shishkin@linux.intel.com>, <wangnan0@huawei.com>,
<jpoimboe@redhat.com>, <ak@linux.intel.com>, <eranian@google.com>,
<namhyung@kernel.org>, <adrian.hunter@intel.com>,
<sukadev@linux.vnet.ibm.com>, <masami.hiramatsu.pt@hitachi.com>,
<tumanova@linux.vnet.ibm.com>, <kan.liang@intel.com>,
<penberg@kernel.org>, <dsahern@gmail.com>,
<linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v7 13/14] perf callchain: Support x86 target platform
Date: Wed, 1 Jun 2016 17:53:22 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <574EB092.9060904@huawei.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20160601084027.GG13738@krava>
在 2016/6/1 16:40, Jiri Olsa 写道:
> On Tue, May 31, 2016 at 11:19:11AM +0000, He Kuang wrote:
>
> SNIP
>
>> diff --git a/tools/perf/util/unwind-libunwind.c b/tools/perf/util/unwind-libunwind.c
>> index e183390..5774317 100644
>> --- a/tools/perf/util/unwind-libunwind.c
>> +++ b/tools/perf/util/unwind-libunwind.c
>> @@ -5,6 +5,7 @@
>> #include "arch/common.h"
>>
>> struct unwind_libunwind_ops __weak *local_unwind_libunwind_ops;
>> +struct unwind_libunwind_ops __weak *x86_32_unwind_libunwind_ops;
>>
>> void unwind__register_ops(struct thread *thread,
>> struct unwind_libunwind_ops *ops)
>> @@ -30,7 +31,13 @@ int unwind__prepare_access(struct thread *thread, struct map *map)
>> dso_type == DSO__TYPE_64BIT, map->dso->name);
>>
>> arch = normalize_arch(thread->mg->machine->env->arch);
>> - pr_debug("unwind: target platform=%s\n", arch);
>> +
>> + if (!strcmp(arch, "x86"))
>> + if (dso_type != DSO__TYPE_64BIT)
>> + ops = x86_32_unwind_libunwind_ops;
>> +
>> + if (!ops)
>> + pr_err("unwind: target platform=%s is not supported\n", arch);
> how could ops become NULL in here? it starts with local_unwind_libunwind_ops
> I dont think this check is needed in here
x86_32_unwind_libunwind_ops is a null pointer when x86_32
libunwind is not supported.
There's a weak defination if CONFIG_LIBUNWIND_X86 is not set.
struct unwind_libunwind_ops __weak *x86_32_unwind_libunwind_ops;
In this case, ops is null and "x86_32 is not supported" error
message is showed up.
> jirka
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2016-06-01 9:59 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 30+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2016-05-31 11:18 [PATCH v7 00/14] Add support for remote unwind He Kuang
2016-05-31 11:18 ` [PATCH v7 01/14] perf tools: Use LIBUNWIND_DIR for remote libunwind feature check He Kuang
2016-05-31 11:19 ` [PATCH v7 02/14] perf tools: Decouple thread->address_space on libunwind He Kuang
2016-05-31 11:19 ` [PATCH v7 03/14] perf tools: Introducing struct unwind_libunwind_ops for local unwind He Kuang
2016-06-01 8:39 ` Jiri Olsa
2016-06-01 8:39 ` Jiri Olsa
2016-05-31 11:19 ` [PATCH v7 04/14] perf tools: Move unwind__prepare_access from thread_new into thread__insert_map He Kuang
2016-06-01 8:39 ` Jiri Olsa
2016-05-31 11:19 ` [PATCH v7 05/14] perf tools: Don't mix LIBUNWIND_LIBS into LIBUNWIND_LDFLAGS He Kuang
2016-05-31 11:19 ` [PATCH v7 06/14] perf tools: Separate local/remote libunwind config He Kuang
2016-06-01 8:39 ` Jiri Olsa
2016-05-31 11:19 ` [PATCH v7 07/14] perf tools: Rename unwind-libunwind.c to unwind-libunwind-local.c He Kuang
2016-05-31 11:19 ` [PATCH v7 08/14] perf tools: Extract common API out of unwind-libunwind-local.c He Kuang
2016-05-31 11:19 ` [PATCH v7 09/14] perf tools: Export normalize_arch() function He Kuang
2016-05-31 11:19 ` [PATCH v7 10/14] perf tools: Check the target platform before assigning unwind methods He Kuang
2016-06-01 8:40 ` Jiri Olsa
2016-06-01 8:40 ` Jiri Olsa
2016-06-01 10:02 ` Hekuang
2016-05-31 11:19 ` [PATCH v7 11/14] perf tools: Change fixed name of libunwind__arch_reg_id to macro He Kuang
2016-05-31 11:19 ` [PATCH v7 12/14] perf tools: Introduce flag to separate local/remote unwind compilation He Kuang
2016-05-31 11:19 ` [PATCH v7 13/14] perf callchain: Support x86 target platform He Kuang
2016-06-01 8:40 ` Jiri Olsa
2016-06-01 12:47 ` Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2016-06-01 13:14 ` Jiri Olsa
2016-06-01 8:40 ` Jiri Olsa
2016-06-01 9:53 ` Hekuang [this message]
2016-06-01 8:41 ` Jiri Olsa
2016-05-31 11:19 ` [PATCH v7 14/14] perf callchain: Support aarch64 cross-platform He Kuang
2016-06-01 8:40 ` Jiri Olsa
2016-06-01 9:54 ` Hekuang
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=574EB092.9060904@huawei.com \
--to=hekuang@huawei.com \
--cc=acme@kernel.org \
--cc=adrian.hunter@intel.com \
--cc=ak@linux.intel.com \
--cc=alexander.shishkin@linux.intel.com \
--cc=dsahern@gmail.com \
--cc=eranian@google.com \
--cc=jolsa@redhat.com \
--cc=jpoimboe@redhat.com \
--cc=kan.liang@intel.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=masami.hiramatsu.pt@hitachi.com \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=namhyung@kernel.org \
--cc=penberg@kernel.org \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=sukadev@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=tumanova@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=wangnan0@huawei.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox