public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Thomas Graziadei <thomas.graziadei@omicronenergy.com>
To: John Stultz <john.stultz@linaro.org>
Cc: lkml <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
	Tony Luck <tony.luck@intel.com>,
	Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@kernel.crashing.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] timekeeping: Fix 1ns/tick drift with GENERIC_TIME_VSYSCALL_OLD
Date: Wed, 1 Jun 2016 13:43:24 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <574ECA5C.4040005@omicronenergy.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CALAqxLX8XV7Ay5gmsZVTYLwwPKr-FSKfCWYwJtNpNxruD1N5Ag@mail.gmail.com>

On 06/01/2016 01:11 AM, John Stultz wrote:
> On Tue, May 31, 2016 at 6:06 AM, Thomas Graziadei
> <thomas.graziadei@omicronenergy.com> wrote:
>> From: Thomas Graziadei <thomas.graziadei@omicronenergy.com>
>>
>> The user notices the problem in a raw and real time drift, calling
>> clock_gettime with CLOCK_REALTIME / CLOCK_MONOTONIC_RAW on a system
>> with no ntp correction taking place (no ntpd or ptp stuff running).
>
> Hmm.. Curious. Was it actually drifting, or was it just
> oscillating/ringing near the RAW clock's value?

It is actually drifting.

This is the output from a little test program:

realtime  : 1464775074:846282133
raw time  : 1054:851963700
drift_real: 999402ns

total duration: 1000s 158517540ns

>
>> The problem is, that old_vsyscall_fixup adds an extra 1ns even though
>> xtime_nsec is already held in full nsecs and the remainder in this
>> case is 0. Do the rounding up buisness only if needed.
>
> The patch looks ok. But I'm curious what architecture you were seeing
> this on (ia64, powerpc?), as it would be much nicer to have those
> architectures migrate off of the old low-res vsyscall calculation and
> use the newer method with sub-ns precision, instead of trying to
> further fix up the deprecated method.
>
> I had submitted a patch to convert ia64 awhile back, but I don't
> recall getting much feedback.
>

We are using a powerpc architecture.

I guess you are right, it would be nicer to use the new method but then 
on the other hand, this timing topic is rather new to me.

> thanks
> -john
>

thanks,
Thomas

  reply	other threads:[~2016-06-01 12:00 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2016-05-31 13:06 [PATCH] timekeeping: Fix 1ns/tick drift with GENERIC_TIME_VSYSCALL_OLD Thomas Graziadei
2016-05-31 23:11 ` John Stultz
2016-06-01 11:43   ` Thomas Graziadei [this message]
2016-06-17 20:55 ` John Stultz

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=574ECA5C.4040005@omicronenergy.com \
    --to=thomas.graziadei@omicronenergy.com \
    --cc=benh@kernel.crashing.org \
    --cc=john.stultz@linaro.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
    --cc=tony.luck@intel.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox