From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S932290AbcFCIZH (ORCPT ); Fri, 3 Jun 2016 04:25:07 -0400 Received: from www381.your-server.de ([78.46.137.84]:57734 "EHLO www381.your-server.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752243AbcFCIZB (ORCPT ); Fri, 3 Jun 2016 04:25:01 -0400 Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] i2c: Add generic support passing secondary devices addresses To: Mika Westerberg , Wolfram Sang References: <1460992811.8946.22.camel@linux.intel.com> <5714FCBE.3060009@metafoo.de> <20160419124028.GF1725@lahna.fi.intel.com> <57162C4E.9090904@metafoo.de> <20160419131631.GG1725@lahna.fi.intel.com> <5716333D.1040106@metafoo.de> <20160419144027.GH1725@lahna.fi.intel.com> <20160424201437.GA2123@katana> <20160425072553.GK1725@lahna.fi.intel.com> <20160425073940.GD1541@katana> <20160425074126.GL1725@lahna.fi.intel.com> Cc: Srinivas Pandruvada , Jean-Michel Hautbois , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-i2c@vger.kernel.org, devicetree@vger.kernel.org, galak@codeaurora.org, ijc+devicetree@hellion.org.uk, mark.rutland@arm.com, pawel.moll@arm.com, robh+dt@kernel.org, laurent.pinchart@ideasonboard.com, Jean-Michel Hautbois From: Lars-Peter Clausen Message-ID: <57513ED8.6000703@metafoo.de> Date: Fri, 3 Jun 2016 10:24:56 +0200 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:38.0) Gecko/20100101 Icedove/38.8.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <20160425074126.GL1725@lahna.fi.intel.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Authenticated-Sender: lars@metafoo.de Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On 04/25/2016 09:41 AM, Mika Westerberg wrote: > On Mon, Apr 25, 2016 at 09:39:41AM +0200, Wolfram Sang wrote: >> On Mon, Apr 25, 2016 at 10:25:53AM +0300, Mika Westerberg wrote: >>> On Sun, Apr 24, 2016 at 10:14:37PM +0200, Wolfram Sang wrote: >>>> >>>>> The above should work with both DT and ACPI so I'm OK with the current >>>>> patch. We can add ACPI parts later when needed. >>>> >>>> Just to make sure, I read this as an ack for the original patch? >>> >>> Yes :) >> >> Thanks! Could you use the formal tag for that in the future please? >> Patchwork automatically collects them and that saves me some work. (I >> even have a keyboard macro for that and use it a lot) > > Sure, sorry about that. > > Acked-by: Mika Westerberg Hi Wolfram, It looks like everybody was OK now with this patch, but it got lost somehow. Should it be resent, or can you still pick it up from patchwork? Thanks, - Lars