From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org>
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand
	id S932365AbcFCJCE (ORCPT <rfc822;w@1wt.eu>);
	Fri, 3 Jun 2016 05:02:04 -0400
Received: from foss.arm.com ([217.140.101.70]:50639 "EHLO foss.arm.com"
	rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP
	id S932176AbcFCJB7 (ORCPT <rfc822;linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>);
	Fri, 3 Jun 2016 05:01:59 -0400
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] pci: Add PCIe driver for Rockchip Soc
To: Lorenzo Pieralisi <lorenzo.pieralisi@arm.com>
References: <1463740105-7061-1-git-send-email-shawn.lin@rock-chips.com>
 <1463740156-7148-1-git-send-email-shawn.lin@rock-chips.com>
 <57483CAA.8000005@arm.com> <20160603085547.GB24547@red-moon>
Cc: Shawn Lin <shawn.lin@rock-chips.com>, Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@google.com>,
        Heiko Stuebner <heiko@sntech.de>, Wenrui Li <wenrui.li@rock-chips.com>,
        Rob Herring <robh+dt@kernel.org>, devicetree@vger.kernel.org,
        Doug Anderson <dianders@chromium.org>, linux-pci@vger.kernel.org,
        linux-rockchip@lists.infradead.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
From: Marc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@arm.com>
Organization: ARM Ltd
Message-ID: <57514783.6000407@arm.com>
Date: Fri, 3 Jun 2016 10:01:55 +0100
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:38.0) Gecko/20100101
 Icedove/38.7.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <20160603085547.GB24547@red-moon>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
List-ID: <linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org>
X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org

On 03/06/16 09:55, Lorenzo Pieralisi wrote:
> On Fri, May 27, 2016 at 01:25:14PM +0100, Marc Zyngier wrote:
> 
> [...]
> 
>>> +	} else {
>>> +		bus = pci_scan_root_bus(&pdev->dev, 0,
>>> +					&rockchip_pcie_ops, port, &res);
>>> +	}
>>> +	if (!bus)
>>> +		return -ENOMEM;
>>> +
>>> +	if (!pci_has_flag(PCI_PROBE_ONLY)) {
>>
>> Why do you have catter for the PCI_PROBE_ONLY case? Nobody should ever
>> use that for properly implemented HW.
> 
> I think that's just copy and paste and it is a useless check given
> that the only way we can set that flag on ARM/ARM64 is through DT
> (of_pci_check_probe_only()) and I doubt that systems probing this
> driver really require a PCI_PROBE_ONLY set-up.
> 
> So, unless you can explain to us why it is really needed, please
> remove the:
> 
> if (!pci_has_flag(PCI_PROBE_ONLY))
> 
> check.

Agreed. Maybe we should add a comment somewhere saying that this is
deprecated on arm/arm64, and only useful to slightly dumb virtualization
environments (kvmtool being the prime example).

Thanks,

	M.
-- 
Jazz is not dead. It just smells funny...