From: Sudip Mukherjee <sudipm.mukherjee@gmail.com>
To: Krzysztof Opasiak <k.opasiak@samsung.com>,
Valentina Manea <valentina.manea.m@gmail.com>,
Shuah Khan <shuah.kh@samsung.com>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-usb@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] usb: usbip: fix null pointer dereference
Date: Sun, 05 Jun 2016 18:54:35 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <5754675B.1050104@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <57513FF3.6050608@samsung.com>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1430 bytes --]
On Friday 03 June 2016 09:29 AM, Krzysztof Opasiak wrote:
>
>
> On 06/02/2016 03:22 PM, Sudip Mukherjee wrote:
>> We have been dereferencing udc before checking it. Lets use it after it
>> has been checked.
>>
>
> To be honest I have mixed feelings about this patch.
>
> On one hand it prevents us from dereferencing potential NULL ptr what is
> generally good. But on the other hand it seems to be a little bit
> pointless overhead. This function is called only in one place, it's
> internal function of vudc driver and in addition generally it is
> currently impossible that this function will get NULL ptr as parameter
> as it's value is taken from container_of(). Not to mention that if this
> is NULL or garbage we will end up in NULL ptr dereference much earlier
> before calling this function.
>
> So if there is something that you would like to fix with this patch and
> you have a real problem with this function could you please provide us
> some more details (for example stack trace)? If this patch is just to
> prevent us from something that will never happen then I would rather to
> not submit this. In my opinion if we get a NULL in this function this
> means that we have some serious problem in UDC core and this check will
> just mask this error.
Yes, I should have seen earlier that the only caller has already
dereferenced udc. So maybe the following will be appropriate in this
situation.
Regards
Sudip
[-- Attachment #2: patch1 --]
[-- Type: text/plain, Size: 454 bytes --]
diff --git a/drivers/usb/usbip/vudc_sysfs.c b/drivers/usb/usbip/vudc_sysfs.c
index 99397fa..0f98f2c 100644
--- a/drivers/usb/usbip/vudc_sysfs.c
+++ b/drivers/usb/usbip/vudc_sysfs.c
@@ -40,7 +40,7 @@ int get_gadget_descs(struct vudc *udc)
struct usb_ctrlrequest req;
int ret;
- if (!udc || !udc->driver || !udc->pullup)
+ if (!udc->driver || !udc->pullup)
return -EINVAL;
req.bRequestType = USB_DIR_IN | USB_TYPE_STANDARD | USB_RECIP_DEVICE;
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2016-06-05 17:54 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2016-06-02 13:22 [PATCH] usb: usbip: fix null pointer dereference Sudip Mukherjee
2016-06-03 8:29 ` Krzysztof Opasiak
2016-06-03 14:21 ` Alan Stern
2016-06-05 17:54 ` Sudip Mukherjee [this message]
2016-06-06 8:20 ` Krzysztof Opasiak
2016-06-06 8:47 ` Sudip Mukherjee
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=5754675B.1050104@gmail.com \
--to=sudipm.mukherjee@gmail.com \
--cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=k.opasiak@samsung.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-usb@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=shuah.kh@samsung.com \
--cc=valentina.manea.m@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).